These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31549105)

  • 1. Registration of patient-relevant references in edentulous jaws using intraoral scanners: simplification of the clinical procedure.
    Att W; Chen YW; Papaspyridakos P
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2019; 14(4):394-404. PubMed ID: 31549105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Technique for Digital Impression and Bite Registration for a Single Edentulous Arch.
    Fang Y; Fang JH; Jeong SM; Choi BH
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e519-e523. PubMed ID: 29522269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital impression and jaw relation record for the fabrication of CAD/CAM custom tray.
    Kanazawa M; Iwaki M; Arakida T; Minakuchi S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Oct; 62(4):509-513. PubMed ID: 29555174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws.
    Patzelt SB; Vonau S; Stampf S; Att W
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Aug; 144(8):914-20. PubMed ID: 23904578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computerized optical impression making of edentulous jaws - An in vivo feasibility study.
    Hack G; Liberman L; Vach K; Tchorz JP; Kohal RJ; Patzelt SBM
    J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Oct; 64(4):444-453. PubMed ID: 32061572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital intraoral scanning technique for edentulous jaws.
    Fang JH; An X; Jeong SM; Choi BH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):733-735. PubMed ID: 28888413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional differences between intraoral scans and conventional impressions of edentulous jaws: A clinical study.
    Lo Russo L; Caradonna G; Troiano G; Salamini A; Guida L; Ciavarella D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 31153614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Benic GI; Hogsett VL; White GS; Lal K; Gallucci GO
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jun; 23(6):676-681. PubMed ID: 21631595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using Intraoral Scanning to Fabricate Complete Dentures: First Experiences.
    Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(2):166-170. PubMed ID: 29518812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and reproducibility of virtual edentulous casts created by laboratory impression scan protocols.
    Peng L; Chen L; Harris BT; Bhandari B; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):389-395. PubMed ID: 29703675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Different implant impression techniques for edentulous patients treated with CAD/CAM complete-arch prostheses: a randomised controlled trial reporting data at 3 year post-loading.
    Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Mangani F; Barlattani A
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):325-40. PubMed ID: 24570979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible.
    Hayama H; Fueki K; Wadachi J; Wakabayashi N
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):347-352. PubMed ID: 29502933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Computer aided design and 3-dimensional printing for the production of custom trays of maxillary edentulous jaws based on 3-dimensional scan of primary impression].
    Chen H; Zhao T; Wang Y; Sun YC
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Oct; 48(5):900-904. PubMed ID: 27752178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Accuracy evaluation of computer aided design and computer aided manufacture template for implant placement].
    Liu H; Liu DX; Wang KT; Wang CL; Zhao Z
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Oct; 28(5):517-21. PubMed ID: 21179688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Precision and Accuracy of a Digital Impression Scanner in Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation.
    Pesce P; Pera F; Setti P; Menini M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(2):171-175. PubMed ID: 29518813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of different types of intraoral scanners and scanning ranges on the precision of digital implant impressions in edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study.
    Miyoshi K; Tanaka S; Yokoyama S; Sanda M; Baba K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jan; 31(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 31608509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of complete dentures based on digital intraoral impressions-Case report.
    Fang JH; An X; Jeong SM; Choi BH
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jan; 62(1):116-120. PubMed ID: 28625663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
    Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.
    Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An In Vitro Study of Factors Influencing the Performance of Digital Intraoral Impressions Operating on Active Wavefront Sampling Technology with Multiple Implants in the Edentulous Maxilla.
    Gimenez-Gonzalez B; Hassan B; Özcan M; Pradíes G
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Dec; 26(8):650-655. PubMed ID: 26934046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.