These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31549416)
1. Patient satisfaction with ball and Equator attachments for single-implant mandibular overdentures: A short-term randomised crossover clinical trial. Taha NEKS; Dias DR; Oliveira TMC; Souza JAC; Leles CR J Oral Rehabil; 2020 Mar; 47(3):361-369. PubMed ID: 31549416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient preference and satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or locator attachments: a crossover clinical trial. Krennmair G; Seemann R; Fazekas A; Ewers R; Piehslinger E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1560-8. PubMed ID: 23189311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets. Ellis JS; Burawi G; Walls A; Thomason JM Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1293-8. PubMed ID: 19832769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial. Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mandibular overdentures retained by two implants: 10-year results from a crossover clinical trial comparing ball-socket and bar-clip attachments. Cune M; Burgers M; van Kampen F; de Putter C; van der Bilt A Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 20617218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Patient satisfaction with different types of implant-retained overdentures in the edentate mandible]. Cune MS; van Kampen FM; van der Bilt A Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2006 Oct; 113(10):401-7. PubMed ID: 17058761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implants and Mini Dental Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Aunmeungtong W; Kumchai T; Strietzel FP; Reichart PA; Khongkhunthian P Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 19(2):328-340. PubMed ID: 27804205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of Different Attachments Used for Implant-Retained Overdentures in Subjects with Resorbed Mandibles: A Crossover Trial. Mahanna FF; Elsyad MA; Mourad SI; Abozaed HW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):423-431. PubMed ID: 32142580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction. De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Angled ball and locator attachments for immediate loaded inclined implants used to retain maxillary overdentures: A cross over study of patient satisfaction and oral health related quality of life. Aboelez MA; Elezz MGA; Abdraboh AE; Elsyad MA Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 24(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 35503746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of general satisfaction, oral health-related quality of life, and patient's self-assessment between mandibular single-implant overdentures and experimental removable complete dentures: A randomized crossover clinical trial. Uehara Y; Kanazawa M; Miyayasu A; Watanabe M; Katheng A; Sato D; Minakuchi S J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103920. PubMed ID: 34906619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A 5-year randomized trial to compare 1 or 2 implants for implant overdentures. Bryant SR; Walton JN; MacEntee MI J Dent Res; 2015 Jan; 94(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 25348544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of immediately loaded single-implant mandibular overdentures versus mandibular complete dentures: A 1-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Nogueira TE; Aguiar FMO; Esfandiari S; Leles CR J Dent; 2018 Oct; 77():43-50. PubMed ID: 30006117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results. MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient satisfaction and masticatory efficiency of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the stud and magnetic attachments. Cheng T; Sun G; Huo J; He X; Wang Y; Ren YF J Dent; 2012 Nov; 40(11):1018-23. PubMed ID: 22925922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient satisfaction with maxillary 3-implant overdentures using different attachment systems opposing mandibular 2-implant overdentures. Al-Zubeidi MI; Alsabeeha NH; Thomson WM; Payne AG Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e11-9. PubMed ID: 21414137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study. Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Crestal Bone Changes and Patient Satisfaction with Single Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures with Dalla Bona and Locator Attachments with Immediate Loading Protocols. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study. Nischal K; Mishra SK; Chowdhary R J Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 29(9):756-765. PubMed ID: 32743968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]