These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31549416)
21. Patient-reported outcome measures and clinical performance of implant-retained mandibular overdentures with stud and ball attachments: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Girundi ALG; Ribeiro MCO; Vargas-Moreno VF; Borges GA; Magno MB; Maia LC; Del Bel Cury AA; Marcello-Machado RM J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):197-211. PubMed ID: 35931572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mandibular 3-implant overdenture: A clinical report of a novel design. Alsabeeha NHM; Ma S; Payne AGT Gerodontology; 2022 Dec; 39(4):425-428. PubMed ID: 36218242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. One-year prospective study on single short (7-mm) implant overdentures in patients with severely resorbed mandibles. Ala LAB; Nogueira TE; Leles CR Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Mar; 33(3):291-301. PubMed ID: 34951501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A quality-of-life comparison between self-aligning and ball attachment systems for 2-implant-retained mandibular overdentures. Bilhan H; Geckili O; Sulun T; Bilgin T J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():167-73. PubMed ID: 20662674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of Ball and Bar Attachment Type on Patient Satisfaction Using Two-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdenture: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial. Deshpande S; Chandak A; Radke U; Mahalle H; Patil PG J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2022 Dec; 21(4):1175-1179. PubMed ID: 36896084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Patient satisfaction versus retention of implant overdentures with two attachment systems: A randomized trial. de Albuquerque RF; Fromentin O; Lassauzay C; Conceição Pereira Saraiva MD Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 21(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 30372576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Single versus two-implant mandibular overdentures using early-loaded titanium-zirconium implants with hydrophilic surface and ball attachments: 1-year randomized clinical trial. de Resende GP; Jordão LMR; de Souza JAC; Schimmel M; Leles CR Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Mar; 32(3):359-368. PubMed ID: 33417279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs. Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Single-Implant Overdentures Retained by a Novel Attachment: A Mixed Methods Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial. de Souza RF; Jabbar AA; Jafarpour D; Bedos C; Esfandiari S; Makhoul NM; Dagdeviren D; Abi Nader S; Feine JS JDR Clin Trans Res; 2024 Jan; 9(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 36127832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population. Awad MA; Lund JP; Shapiro SH; Locker D; Klemetti E; Chehade A; Savard A; Feine JS Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 12956494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A within-subject clinical trial on the conversion of mandibular two-implant to three-implant overdenture: Patient-centered outcomes and willingness to pay. Emami E; Alesawy A; de Grandmont P; Cerutti-Kopplin D; Kodama N; Menassa M; Rompré P; Durand R Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Mar; 30(3):218-228. PubMed ID: 30681193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures. A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants. Wismeijer D; Van Waas MA; Vermeeren JI; Mulder J; Kalk W Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Aug; 26(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 9258715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Single-implant overdentures retained by the Novaloc attachment system: study protocol for a mixed-methods randomized cross-over trial. de Souza RF; Bedos C; Esfandiari S; Makhoul NM; Dagdeviren D; Abi Nader S; Jabbar AA; Feine JS Trials; 2018 Apr; 19(1):243. PubMed ID: 29685161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures. Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants. Walton JN; Glick N; Macentee MI Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with resilient liner and clip attachments for bar- and implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year randomized clinical study. ELsyad MA Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 22371836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of zirconia bar compared to cobalt chromium bar retaining mandibular implant overdenture: A crossover study. Altonbary GY; Emera RMK J Oral Rehabil; 2021 Jul; 48(7):827-835. PubMed ID: 33682180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study. Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Retention of Different Attachment Systems for Digitally Designed Mandibular Implant Overdenture. Abdelaziz MS; Fawzy AM; Ghali RM; Nassar HI J Prosthodont; 2023 Feb; 32(2):162-169. PubMed ID: 35344237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]