1070 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31549788)
21. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The augment-and-modular-cage revision system for reconstruction of severe acetabular defects-two-year clinical and radiographic results.
Roessler PP; Jaenisch M; Kuhlmann M; Wacker M; Johannes Wagenhäuser P; Gravius S; Wirtz DC
Int Orthop; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2269-2278. PubMed ID: 30539219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention using computed tomography-based navigation.
Kubota Y; Kaku N; Tagomori H; Kataoka M; Tsumura H
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 105(7):1311-1317. PubMed ID: 31522901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Level of surgical experience is associated with change in hip center of rotation following cementless total hip arthroplasty: A radiographic assessment.
Kim SC; Lim YW; Kwon SY; Jo WL; Ju SH; Park CJ; Lee CW; Kim YS
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0178300. PubMed ID: 28542504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Ganz acetabular reinforcement ring shows excellent long-term results when used as a primary implant: a retrospective analysis of two hundred and forty primary total hip arthroplasties with a minimum follow-up of twenty years.
Attinger MC; Haefeli PC; Bäcker HC; Flueckiger R; Ballmer PM; Siebenrock KA; Klenke FM
Int Orthop; 2019 Dec; 43(12):2697-2705. PubMed ID: 30663000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Double-trabecular metal cup technique for the management of Paprosky type III defects without pelvic discontinuity.
Loppini M; Schiavi P; Rocca AD; Traverso F; Rocca FD; Mazziotta G; Astore F; Grappiolo G
Hip Int; 2018 Nov; 28(2_suppl):66-72. PubMed ID: 30755117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. What Are the Long-term Results of Cemented Revision THA with Use of Both Acetabular and Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting in Patients Younger Than 55 Years?
Verspeek J; Nijenhuis TA; Kuijpers MFL; Rijnen WHC; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 32898047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Outcomes of Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients.
Harwin SF; Sodhi N; Ehiorobo J; Khlopas A; Sultan AA; Mont MA
Surg Technol Int; 2019 May; 34():367-370. PubMed ID: 30500976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Correlation of Cup Inclination Angle with Liner Wear for Metal-on-polyethylene in Hip Primary Arthroplasty.
Tian JL; Sun L; Hu RY; Han W; Tian XB
Orthop Surg; 2017 May; 9(2):186-190. PubMed ID: 28557297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients at High Risk for Dislocation.
Harwin SF; Mistry JB; Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Gwam C; Newman JM; Higuera CA; Bonutti PM; Malkani AL; Kolisek FR; Delanois RE; Mont MA
Surg Technol Int; 2017 Jul; 30():251-258. PubMed ID: 28395391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Becker V-shaped lateral rotation osteotomy in total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type IV development dislocation of hip].
Li Y; Ma W; Sun J; Song X; An M; Zhang Q
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 27(9):1032-6. PubMed ID: 24279008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Acetabular revision arthroplasty using jumbo cups: an experience in Asia.
Fan CY; Chen WM; Lee OK; Huang CK; Chiang CC; Chen TH
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Aug; 128(8):809-13. PubMed ID: 17985149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Extra-large uncemented acetabular components for hip revision].
Huang Z; Zhang W; Lin J; Li W; Bai G; Shen R
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 27(11):1313-7. PubMed ID: 24501889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention after bipolar hip arthroplasty.
Kaku N; Tabata T; Tagomori H; Tsumura H
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Mar; 137(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 28150224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Polyethylene Liner and Femoral Head Exchange in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Factors Associated with Long-Term Success and Failure.
Petis SM; Kubista B; Hartzler RU; Abdel MP; Berry DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Mar; 101(5):421-428. PubMed ID: 30845036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Use of uncemented Beznoska acetabular cup - mid-term results at the orthopedic ward in Pelhrimov].
Letocha J; Behounek J; Skoták M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 17623608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results of 60 hips.
Unger AS; Lewis RJ; Gruen T
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Dec; 20(8):1002-9. PubMed ID: 16376255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Prevention of prothesis dislocation after the revision of total hip arthroplasty].
Li YJ; Zhang LC; Yang GJ; Zhang CC; Wang WL; Lin RX; Cai CY
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2008 Mar; 21(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 19105429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years.
Dearborn JT; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Apr; 81(4):469-80. PubMed ID: 10225792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty with a dual-mobility cup. Matched case-control study (16 cases vs. 48 controls).
Huten D; Fournier Y; Gicquel T; Bertho P; Basselot F; Hamadouche M
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 105(7):1303-1309. PubMed ID: 31153859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
