These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31550538)

  • 1. The Differences Among Kinematic Parameters for Evaluating the Quality of Intervertebral Motion of the Cervical Spine in Clinical and Experimental Studies: Concepts, Research and Measurement Techniques. A Literature Review.
    Sang D; Cui W; Guo Z; Sang H; Liu B
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Jan; 133():343-357.e1. PubMed ID: 31550538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical disc prostheses need a variable center of rotation for flexion / extension below disc level, plus a separate COR for lateral bending above disc level to more closely replicate in-vivo motion: MRI-based biomechanical in-vivo study.
    Muhlbauer MK; Tomasch E; Sinz W; Trattnig S; Steffan H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Mar; 23(1):227. PubMed ID: 35260131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical Relevance of Cervical Kinematic Quality Parameters in Planar Movement.
    Guo Z; Cui W; Sang DC; Sang HP; Liu BG
    Orthop Surg; 2019 Apr; 11(2):167-175. PubMed ID: 30884156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of cervical intervertebral disc degeneration on the motion path of instantaneous center of rotation at degenerated and adjacent segments: A finite element analysis.
    Sang D; Du CF; Wu B; Cai XY; Cui W; Yuchi CX; Rong T; Sang H; Liu B
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 Jul; 134():104426. PubMed ID: 33979732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics in the healthy young adult cervical spine during dynamic functional loading.
    Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
    J Biomech; 2015 May; 48(7):1286-93. PubMed ID: 25814180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity, reliability and accuracy of the instant center of rotation calculation in the cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.
    Baillargeon E; Anderst WJ
    J Biomech; 2013 Feb; 46(4):670-6. PubMed ID: 23317757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sagittal plane lumbar intervertebral motion during seated flexion-extension radiographs of 658 asymptomatic nondegenerated levels.
    Staub BN; Holman PJ; Reitman CA; Hipp J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Dec; 23(6):731-8. PubMed ID: 26296193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of Cervical Spinal Joint Loading and Secondary Motion Using a Musculoskeletal Multibody Dynamics Model Via Force-Dependent Kinematics Approach.
    Diao H; Xin H; Dong J; He X; Li D; Jin Z
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42(24):E1403-E1409. PubMed ID: 28368985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of spinal motion with cervical disk arthroplasty: computer-aided radiographic analysis.
    Powell JW; Sasso RC; Metcalf NH; Anderson PA; Hipp JA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr; 23(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 20051921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Total disc arthroplasties change the kinematics of functional spinal units during lateral bending.
    Roch PJ; Wagner M; Weiland J; Gezzi R; Spiering S; Lehmann W; Saul D; Weiser L; Viezens L; Wachowski MM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Mar; 73():130-139. PubMed ID: 31982810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of three-dimensional helical axes of the cervical spine between in vitro and in vivo testing.
    Jonas R; Demmelmaier R; Hacker SP; Wilke HJ
    Spine J; 2018 Mar; 18(3):515-524. PubMed ID: 29074465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In cervical arthroplasty, only prosthesis with flexible biomechanical properties should be used for achieving a near-physiological motion pattern.
    Muhlbauer M; Tomasch E; Sinz W; Trattnig S; Steffan H
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Sep; 15(1):391. PubMed ID: 32907606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Locating the Instant Center of Rotation in the Subaxial Cervical Spine with Biplanar Fluoroscopy during
    Kim SH; Ham DW; Lee JI; Park SW; Ko MJ; Koo SB; Song KS
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2019 Dec; 11(4):482-489. PubMed ID: 31788173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of fixed sagittal plane centers of rotation on motion segment mechanics and range of motion in the cervical spine.
    Kelly BP; Zufelt NA; Sander EJ; DiAngelo DJ
    J Biomech; 2013 Apr; 46(7):1369-75. PubMed ID: 23499226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical evaluation of a metal-on-metal cervical intervertebral disc prosthesis.
    Colle KO; Butler JB; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Theodore N; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2013 Nov; 13(11):1640-9. PubMed ID: 24094992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo 3D kinematic changes in the cervical spine after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Nagamoto Y; Iwasaki M; Sugiura T; Fujimori T; Matsuo Y; Kashii M; Sakaura H; Ishii T; Murase T; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):417-24. PubMed ID: 24926932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.
    Park DK; Lin EL; Phillips FM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(9):721-30. PubMed ID: 20543765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc.
    Pickett GE; Rouleau JP; Duggal N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Sep; 30(17):1949-54. PubMed ID: 16135984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical testing simulation of a cadaver spine specimen: development and evaluation study.
    Ahn HS; DiAngelo DJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11):E330-6. PubMed ID: 17495766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.