These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31551639)

  • 21. Evaluating the Impact of Guessing and Its Interactions With Other Test Characteristics on Confidence Interval Procedures for Coefficient Alpha.
    Paek I
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Apr; 76(2):205-230. PubMed ID: 29795863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Role of Item Distributions on Reliability Estimation: The Case of Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha.
    Olvera Astivia OL; Kroc E; Zumbo BD
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Oct; 80(5):825-846. PubMed ID: 32855561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here.
    McNeish D
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):412-433. PubMed ID: 28557467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cognitive Diagnostic Models for Random Guessing Behaviors.
    Hsu CL; Jin KY; Chiu MM
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():570365. PubMed ID: 33101139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Implications of Removing Random Guessing from Rasch Item Estimates in Vertical Scaling.
    Marais I
    J Appl Meas; 2015; 16(2):113-28. PubMed ID: 26075662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Estimation of Cronbach's alpha coefficient in the context of item response theory].
    Shojima K; Toyoda H
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2002 Aug; 73(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 12436881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Validation of the French version of the Body Shape Questionnaire].
    Rousseau A; Knotter A; Barbe P; Raich R; Chabrol H
    Encephale; 2005; 31(2):162-73. PubMed ID: 15959443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Designing and Testing an Inventory for Measuring Social Media Competency of Certified Health Education Specialists.
    Alber JM; Bernhardt JM; Stellefson M; Weiler RM; Anderson-Lewis C; Miller MD; MacInnes J
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Sep; 17(9):e221. PubMed ID: 26399428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Effects of Vignette Scoring on Reliability and Validity of Self-Reports.
    von Davier M; Shin HJ; Khorramdel L; Stankov L
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Jun; 42(4):291-306. PubMed ID: 29881126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Side Streets and U-Turns: Effects of Context Switching, Direction Switching, and Factor Switching on Interitem Correlations and Misresponse Rates.
    Ickes W; Babcock M; Hamby T; Park A; Robinson R; Taylor W
    J Pers Assess; 2019; 101(3):326-339. PubMed ID: 29652526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Initial validation of the Yin-Yang Assessment Questionnaire for persons with diabetes mellitus.
    Wong YC; Pang MC
    World J Diabetes; 2015 Sep; 6(11):1198-206. PubMed ID: 26380063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Lymphatic Malformation Function (LMF) Instrument.
    Kirkham EM; Edwards TC; Weaver EM; Balakrishnan K; Perkins JA
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Oct; 153(4):656-62. PubMed ID: 26195574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the selection, optimization, compensation questionnaire.
    Viglund K; Aléx L; Jonsén E; Lundman B; Norberg A; Fischer RS; Strandberg G; Nygren B
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2013 Jun; 27(2):460-7. PubMed ID: 22671769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Investigation and analysis of child neglect in 1163 urban children aged 3 - 6 years].
    Yang ZN; Pan JP;
    Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Jul; 41(7):501-7. PubMed ID: 14746675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Comparison of Modern and Popular Approaches to Calculating Reliability for Dichotomously Scored Items.
    Béland S; Falk CF
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Jun; 46(4):321-337. PubMed ID: 35601261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [French version of TASTE (test for the ability and evaluation)].
    Masson AM; Cadot M; Pereira AM; Depreeuw E; Ansseau M
    Encephale; 2001; 27(6):527-38. PubMed ID: 11865560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the Early Onset Scoliosis 24 Items Questionnaire (EOSQ-24).
    Hanbali Y; Perry T; Hanif A; Matsomotu H; Musmar H; Bader K; Azmi Ahmad A
    SICOT J; 2019 Jan; 5():7. PubMed ID: 30834888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Psychometric Evaluation of a Novel Instrument Assessing the Impact of Migraine on Physical Functioning: The Migraine Physical Function Impact Diary.
    Kawata AK; Hsieh R; Bender R; Shaffer S; Revicki DA; Bayliss M; Buse DC; Desai P; Sapra S; Ortmeier B; Hareendran A
    Headache; 2017 Oct; 57(9):1385-1398. PubMed ID: 28857154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development of a 32-item scale to assess postoperative dysfunction after upper gastrointestinal cancer resection.
    Nakamura M; Kido Y; Egawa T
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Jun; 17(11):1440-9. PubMed ID: 18482141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reliability by surgical status of self-reported outcomes in patients who have shoulder pathologies.
    Cook KF; Roddey TS; Olson SL; Gartsman GM; Valenzuela FF; Hanten WP
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2002 Jul; 32(7):336-46. PubMed ID: 12113468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.