These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31551674)

  • 1. Effect of User Practice on Prosthetic Finger Control With an Intuitive Myoelectric Decoder.
    Krasoulis A; Vijayakumar S; Nazarpour K
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():891. PubMed ID: 31551674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning from demonstration: Teaching a myoelectric prosthesis with an intact limb via reinforcement learning.
    Vasan G; Pilarski PM
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1457-1464. PubMed ID: 28814025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Myoelectric digit action decoding with multi-output, multi-class classification: an offline analysis.
    Krasoulis A; Nazarpour K
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16872. PubMed ID: 33037253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of Muscle Synergies in Real-Time Classification of Upper Limb Motions using Extreme Learning Machines.
    Antuvan CW; Bisio F; Marini F; Yen SC; Cambria E; Masia L
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Aug; 13(1):76. PubMed ID: 27527511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concurrent Adaptation of Human and Machine Improves Simultaneous and Proportional Myoelectric Control.
    Hahne JM; Dahne S; Hwang HJ; Muller KR; Parra LC
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2015 Jul; 23(4):618-27. PubMed ID: 25680209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved prosthetic hand control with concurrent use of myoelectric and inertial measurements.
    Krasoulis A; Kyranou I; Erden MS; Nazarpour K; Vijayakumar S
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jul; 14(1):71. PubMed ID: 28697795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Model and experiments to optimize co-adaptation in a simplified myoelectric control system.
    Couraud M; Cattaert D; Paclet F; Oudeyer PY; de Rugy A
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Apr; 15(2):026006. PubMed ID: 28832013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decoding of individuated finger movements using surface electromyography.
    Tenore FV; Ramos A; Fahmy A; Acharya S; Etienne-Cummings R; Thakor NV
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 May; 56(5):1427-34. PubMed ID: 19473933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Alternative Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Approach for the Control of Hand Prostheses: A Case Study of Use in Daily Life by a Dysmelia Subject.
    Mastinu E; Ahlberg J; Lendaro E; Hermansson L; Hakansson B; Ortiz-Catalan M
    IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med; 2018; 6():2600112. PubMed ID: 29637030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of real-time machine learning to myoelectric prosthesis control: A case series in adaptive switching.
    Edwards AL; Dawson MR; Hebert JS; Sherstan C; Sutton RS; Chan KM; Pilarski PM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Oct; 40(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 26423106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Real-time myoelectric decoding of individual finger movements for a virtual target task.
    Smith RJ; Huberdeau D; Tenore F; Thakor NV
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():2376-9. PubMed ID: 19965192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Context-dependent adaptation improves robustness of myoelectric control for upper-limb prostheses.
    Patel GK; Hahne JM; Castellini C; Farina D; Dosen S
    J Neural Eng; 2017 Oct; 14(5):056016. PubMed ID: 28691694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of Myoelectric Controller Performance and Kinematic Behavior of a Novel Soft Synergy-Inspired Robotic Hand for Prosthetic Applications.
    Fani S; Bianchi M; Jain S; Pimenta Neto JS; Boege S; Grioli G; Bicchi A; Santello M
    Front Neurorobot; 2016; 10():11. PubMed ID: 27799908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative study of state-of-the-art myoelectric controllers for multigrasp prosthetic hands.
    Segil JL; Controzzi M; Weir RF; Cipriani C
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(9):1439-54. PubMed ID: 25803683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. User adaptation in Myoelectric Man-Machine Interfaces.
    Hahne JM; Markovic M; Farina D
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):4437. PubMed ID: 28667260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensor fusion and computer vision for context-aware control of a multi degree-of-freedom prosthesis.
    Markovic M; Dosen S; Popovic D; Graimann B; Farina D
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Dec; 12(6):066022. PubMed ID: 26529274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Locomotor Adaptation by Transtibial Amputees Walking With an Experimental Powered Prosthesis Under Continuous Myoelectric Control.
    Huang S; Wensman JP; Ferris DP
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 May; 24(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 26057851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gaussian Process Autoregression for Simultaneous Proportional Multi-Modal Prosthetic Control With Natural Hand Kinematics.
    Xiloyannis M; Gavriel C; Thomik AAC; Faisal AA
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Oct; 25(10):1785-1801. PubMed ID: 28880183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Real-Time and Offline Evaluation of Myoelectric Pattern Recognition for the Decoding of Hand Movements.
    Abbaspour S; Naber A; Ortiz-Catalan M; GholamHosseini H; Lindén M
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(16):. PubMed ID: 34451119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving bimanual interaction with a prosthesis using semi-autonomous control.
    Volkmar R; Dosen S; Gonzalez-Vargas J; Baum M; Markovic M
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Nov; 16(1):140. PubMed ID: 31727087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.