These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31552304)

  • 1. Quality in peer review.
    Commun Biol; 2019; 2():352. PubMed ID: 31552304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer Review in Scientific Scholarship.
    Lowe NK
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2017; 46(6):799-800. PubMed ID: 29028479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Academic conflict of interest.
    Annane D; Lerolle N; Meuris S; Sibilla J; Olsen KM
    Intensive Care Med; 2019 Jan; 45(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 30426140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Open review and the quest for increased transparency in neuroscience publication.
    Foxe JJ; Bolam P
    Eur J Neurosci; 2017 May; 45(9):1125-1126. PubMed ID: 28186675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer-Review and Rejection Causes in Submitting Original Medical Manuscripts.
    Mendiola Pastrana IR; Hernández AV; Pérez Manjarrez FE; López EO; Romero-Henríquez LF; López-Ortiz G
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2020; 40(3):182-186. PubMed ID: 32427687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review: A critical step in the editorial process.
    Agrawal R
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2020; 63(3):347-349. PubMed ID: 32769320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review to ensure quality in forensic mental health publication.
    Felthous AR; Wettstein RM
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(3):305-14. PubMed ID: 25187283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Limited online training opportunities exist for scholarly peer reviewers.
    Willis JV; Cobey KD; Ramos J; Chow R; Ng JY; Alayche M; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Sep; 161():65-73. PubMed ID: 37421994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Problems identified by secondary review of accepted manuscripts.
    Garfunkel JM; Ulshen MH; Hamrick HJ; Lawson EE
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1369-71. PubMed ID: 2304215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. More than 1000 new manuscripts in 2017.
    Glimelius B
    Acta Oncol; 2018 Feb; 57(2):174-175. PubMed ID: 29303398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer.
    Faggion CM
    Br Dent J; 2016 Feb; 220(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 26917302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of acceptance or rejection on the author's evaluation of peer review of medical manuscripts.
    Garfunkel JM; Lawson EE; Hamrick HJ; Ulshen MH
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1376-8. PubMed ID: 2304217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review: A critical cog in the scholarship wheel.
    Zavod RM
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2018; 10(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 29248064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementation and Outcomes of a Faculty-Based, Peer Review Manuscript Writing Workshop.
    Kulage KM; Larson EL
    J Prof Nurs; 2016; 32(4):262-70. PubMed ID: 27424926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ninth international congress on peer review and scientific publication: call for research.
    Ioannidis JPA; Berkwits M; Flanagin A; Godlee F; Bloom T
    BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5475. PubMed ID: 31527134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Critical Review Ahead of Publication.
    Dubowitz V
    Neuromuscul Disord; 2019 Jun; 29(6):412. PubMed ID: 31227065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis.
    Strinzel M; Severin A; Milzow K; Egger M
    mBio; 2019 Jun; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 31164459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current market rates for scholarly publishing services.
    Grossmann A; Brembs B
    F1000Res; 2021; 10():20. PubMed ID: 34316354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review guidance: how do you write a good review?
    Allen TW
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2013 Dec; 113(12):916-20. PubMed ID: 24285034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review of medical journals: safeguarding the patient.
    D'Ambrosia R
    Orthopedics; 1990 May; 13(5):505. PubMed ID: 2352898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.