These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31552806)

  • 1. Visual working memory load does not affect the overall stimulus processing time in visual search.
    Xin K; Li Z
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Mar; 73(3):330-343. PubMed ID: 31552806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finding memory in search: the effect of visual working memory load on visual search.
    Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1457-66. PubMed ID: 20603775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring the contributions of spatial and non-spatial working memory to priming of pop-out.
    Ahn J; Patel TN; Buetti S; Lleras A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1012-1026. PubMed ID: 28176214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of working memory contents and perceptual load on distractor processing: When a response-related distractor is held in working memory.
    Koshino H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():19-25. PubMed ID: 27838400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A role for spatial and nonspatial working memory processes in visual search.
    Anderson EJ; Mannan SK; Rees G; Sumner P; Kennard C
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(5):301-12. PubMed ID: 25116297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A secondary task is not always costly: Context-based guidance of visual search survives interference from a demanding working memory task.
    Annac E; Zang X; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):381-399. PubMed ID: 30260470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Working memory load predicts visual search efficiency: Evidence from a novel pupillary response paradigm.
    Attar N; Schneps MH; Pomplun M
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Oct; 44(7):1038-49. PubMed ID: 27119363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual working memory modulates rapid eye movements to simple onset targets.
    Hollingworth A; Matsukura M; Luck SJ
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):790-6. PubMed ID: 23508739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of load on the guidance of visual attention from working memory.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Huang S; Kong L; Wang S
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2356-61. PubMed ID: 21964327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of memory load and stimulus relevance on the EEG during a visual selective memory search task: an ERP and ERD/ERS study.
    Gomarus HK; Althaus M; Wijers AA; Minderaa RB
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Apr; 117(4):871-84. PubMed ID: 16442346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Memory load affects visual search processes without influencing search efficiency.
    Solman GJ; Allan Cheyne J; Smilek D
    Vision Res; 2011 May; 51(10):1185-91. PubMed ID: 21426915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Guidance of visual attention from working memory contents depends on stimulus attributes.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Kong L; Huang S; Yue Z; Wang S
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Dec; 486(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 20884328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full.
    Woodman GF; Vogel EK; Luck SJ
    Psychol Sci; 2001 May; 12(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 11437304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural measures of working memory in a bilateral change detection task.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Jan; 58(1):e13683. PubMed ID: 33215729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Components of working memory and visual selective attention.
    Burnham BR; Sabia M; Langan C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):391-403. PubMed ID: 23875574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.
    Dowd EW; Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 25737257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Executive working memory involved in the learning of contextual cueing effect.
    Chen M; Wang C; Sclodnick B; Zhao G; Liu X
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Nov; 237(11):3059-3070. PubMed ID: 31538226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Executive and perceptual distraction in visual working memory.
    Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1677-1693. PubMed ID: 28414499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory.
    Hollingworth A; Beck VM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 27123681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.