These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31553255)
1. Psychosocial impact of mobility assistive technology on people with neurological conditions. Jiménez Arberas E; Ordoñez Fernández FF; Rodríguez Menéndez S Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Jul; 16(5):465-471. PubMed ID: 31553255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Discontinuation or abandonment of mobility assistive technology among people with neurological conditions. Jiménez-Arberas E; Ordóñez-Fernández FF Rev Neurol; 2021 Jun; 72(12):426-432. PubMed ID: 34109998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The psychosocial impact of assistive device scale: Italian validation in a cohort of nonambulant people with neuromotor disorders. Tofani M; Candeloro C; Sabbadini M; Lucibello L; Figura M; Fabbrini G; Galeoto G; Castelli E Assist Technol; 2020; 32(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 29694271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pain, fatigue, function and participation among long-term manual wheelchair users partnered with a mobility service dog. Vincent C; Gagnon DH; Dumont F; Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Feb; 14(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 29157032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Pilot Study of the Psychosocial Impact of Low-Cost Assistive Technology for Sexual Functioning in People with Acquired Brain Injury. Jiménez E; Ordóñez F Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 33916565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How Loan Bank of Assistive Technology Impacts on Life of Persons with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Neuromuscular Diseases: A Collaborative Initiative. Pousada T; Garabal-Barbeira J; Martínez C; Groba B; Nieto-Riveiro L; Pereira J Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jan; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 33477437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale in a Large Sample of People With Neuromuscular, Neurological, or Hearing Disabilities. Díez E; Jiménez-Arberas E; Pousada T Front Psychol; 2021; 12():659562. PubMed ID: 34177710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS): translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese (Taiwanese) version. Hsieh YJ; Lenker JA Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2006; 1(1-2):49-57. PubMed ID: 19256167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Contextual Factors on the Perceived Participation of People With Multiple Sclerosis and Gait Impairment Using Mobility Assistive Devices: A Qualitative Analysis. Dilger EM; Reeck N; Hoekstra D; Thiele A; Brütt AL Health Expect; 2024 Oct; 27(5):e70033. PubMed ID: 39340297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trekking Poles to Aid Multiple Sclerosis Walking Impairment: An Exploratory Comparison of the Effects of Assistive Devices on Psychosocial Impact and Walking. Cohen ET; Huser S; Barone K; Barone DA Int J MS Care; 2021; 23(3):135-141. PubMed ID: 34177386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Occupational performance and the transition to powered mobility: a pilot study. Buning ME; Angelo JA; Schmeler MR Am J Occup Ther; 2001; 55(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 11723976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cross-cultural adaptation of the psychosocial impact of assistive device scale (PIADS) for Puerto Rican assistive technology users. Orellano EM; Jutai JW Assist Technol; 2013; 25(4):194-203. PubMed ID: 24620702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mobility devices for children with physical disabilities: use, satisfaction and impact on participation. Gudjonsdottir B; Gudmundsdottir SB Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Aug; 18(6):722-729. PubMed ID: 34102088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of mobility assistive technology devices on participation for individuals with disabilities. Carver J; Ganus A; Ivey JM; Plummer T; Eubank A Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016 Aug; 11(6):468-77. PubMed ID: 25815679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of a metric to evaluate the ergonomic principles of assistive systems, based on the DIN 92419. Xavier Macedo de Azevedo F; Heimgärtner R; Nebe K Ergonomics; 2023 Jun; 66(6):821-848. PubMed ID: 36137226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Geospatial assistive technologies for wheelchair users: a scoping review of usability measures and criteria for mobile user interfaces and their potential applicability. Prémont MÉ; Vincent C; Mostafavi MA; Routhier F Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Feb; 15(2):119-131. PubMed ID: 30663444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of satisfaction with geospatial assistive technology (ESGAT): a methodological and usability study. Vincent C; Girard R; Dumont F; Archambault P; Routhier F; Mostafavi MA Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2022 Feb; 17(2):134-151. PubMed ID: 32501781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability, convergent validity and applicability of the Assistive Technology Outcome Profile for Mobility for middle-aged and older power wheelchair users. Auger C; Rushton PW; Jutai JW; Miller WC Aust Occup Ther J; 2018 Oct; 65(5):439-448. PubMed ID: 30178483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of the Assistive Technology Professional on the Provision of Mobility Assistive Equipment. Schein RM; Yang A; McKernan GP; Mesoros M; Pramana G; Schmeler MR; Dicianno BE Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Oct; 102(10):1895-1901. PubMed ID: 33891909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]