These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31555042)

  • 1. The thermodynamics of guest complexation to octa-acid and tetra-
    Sullivan MR; Yao W; Gibb BC
    Supramol Chem; 2019; 31(3):184-189. PubMed ID: 31555042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.
    Rizzi A; Murkli S; McNeill JN; Yao W; Sullivan M; Gilson MK; Chiu MW; Isaacs L; Gibb BC; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):937-963. PubMed ID: 30415285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An overview of the SAMPL8 host-guest binding challenge.
    Amezcua M; Setiadi J; Ge Y; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Oct; 36(10):707-734. PubMed ID: 36229622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SAMPL7 Host-Guest Challenge Overview: assessing the reliability of polarizable and non-polarizable methods for binding free energy calculations.
    Amezcua M; El Khoury L; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 33392951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binding of carboxylate and trimethylammonium salts to octa-acid and TEMOA deep-cavity cavitands.
    Sullivan MR; Sokkalingam P; Nguyen T; Donahue JP; Gibb BC
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 27432339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinities and binding poses from spherical-coordinates-biased simulations.
    Sun Z; He Q; Li X; Zhu Z
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):589-600. PubMed ID: 31974852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SAMPL6 host-guest challenge: binding free energies via a multistep approach.
    Eken Y; Patel P; Díaz T; Jones MR; Wilson AK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1097-1115. PubMed ID: 30225724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proximal charge effects on guest binding to a non-polar pocket.
    Suating P; Nguyen TT; Ernst NE; Wang Y; Jordan JH; Gibb CLD; Ashbaugh HS; Gibb BC
    Chem Sci; 2020 Apr; 11(14):3656-3663. PubMed ID: 32864079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Guest Controlled Nonmonotonic Deep Cavity Cavitand Assembly State Switching.
    Tang D; Barnett JW; Gibb BC; Ashbaugh HS
    J Phys Chem B; 2017 Nov; 121(47):10717-10725. PubMed ID: 29099596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overview of the SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: Are we doing better?
    Yin J; Henriksen NM; Slochower DR; Shirts MR; Chiu MW; Mobley DL; Gilson MK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 27658802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binding of cyclic carboxylates to octa-acid deep-cavity cavitand.
    Gibb CL; Gibb BC
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Apr; 28(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 24218290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: computing binding free energies and enthalpies from explicit solvent simulations by the attach-pull-release (APR) method.
    Yin J; Henriksen NM; Slochower DR; Gilson MK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):133-145. PubMed ID: 27638809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.
    Song LF; Bansal N; Zheng Z; Merz KM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1013-1026. PubMed ID: 30143917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blinded predictions of standard binding free energies: lessons learned from the SAMPL6 challenge.
    Papadourakis M; Bosisio S; Michel J
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1047-1058. PubMed ID: 30159717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binding free energies in the SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenge calculated with MM and QM methods.
    Caldararu O; Olsson MA; Misini Ignjatović M; Wang M; Ryde U
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1027-1046. PubMed ID: 30203229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SAMPL6 host-guest blind predictions using a non equilibrium alchemical approach.
    Procacci P; Guarrasi M; Guarnieri G
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):965-982. PubMed ID: 30128927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the umbrella sampling and the double decoupling method in binding free energy predictions for SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenges.
    Nishikawa N; Han K; Wu X; Tofoleanu F; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1075-1086. PubMed ID: 30324304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest binding poses and binding affinities from spherical-coordinates-biased simulations.
    Sun Z
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):105-115. PubMed ID: 32776199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Absolute binding free energies for the SAMPL6 cucurbit[8]uril host-guest challenge via the AMOEBA polarizable force field.
    Laury ML; Wang Z; Gordon AS; Ponder JW
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1087-1095. PubMed ID: 30324303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of log P, pK
    Bergazin TD; Tielker N; Zhang Y; Mao J; Gunner MR; Francisco K; Ballatore C; Kast SM; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jul; 35(7):771-802. PubMed ID: 34169394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.