These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31555111)

  • 21. Dividing attention influences contextual facilitation and revision during language comprehension.
    Hubbard RJ; Federmeier KD
    Brain Res; 2021 Aug; 1764():147466. PubMed ID: 33861998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Internal mechanisms underlying anticipatory language processing: Evidence from event-related-potentials and neural oscillations.
    Li X; Zhang Y; Xia J; Swaab TY
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jul; 102():70-81. PubMed ID: 28522331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Memory as assessed by recognition and reading time in normal and memory-impaired people with Alzheimer's disease and other neurological disorders.
    Moscovitch M; Winocur G; McLachlan D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1986 Dec; 115(4):331-47. PubMed ID: 2949044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predictability's aftermath: Downstream consequences of word predictability as revealed by repetition effects.
    Rommers J; Federmeier KD
    Cortex; 2018 Apr; 101():16-30. PubMed ID: 29414458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Neural Correlates of Semantic Prediction and Resolution in Sentence Processing.
    Grisoni L; Miller TM; Pulvermüller F
    J Neurosci; 2017 May; 37(18):4848-4858. PubMed ID: 28411271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The congruent, the incongruent, and the unexpected: Event-related potentials unveil the processes involved in schematic encoding.
    Höltje G; Lubahn B; Mecklinger A
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Aug; 131():285-293. PubMed ID: 31112723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. "I heard it before … or not": time-course of ERP response and behavioural correlates associated with false recognition memory.
    Pérez-Mata N; Albert J; Carretié L; López-Martín S; Sánchez-Carmona AJ
    Memory; 2024 Apr; ():1-20. PubMed ID: 38588660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. False memory and level of processing effect: an event-related potential study.
    Beato MS; Boldini A; Cadavid S
    Neuroreport; 2012 Sep; 23(13):804-8. PubMed ID: 22811058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predictability and novelty in literal language comprehension: an ERP study.
    Davenport T; Coulson S
    Brain Res; 2011 Oct; 1418():70-82. PubMed ID: 21925647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Event related brain potentials and illusory memories: the effects of differential encoding.
    Nessler D; Mecklinger A; Penney TB
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Jan; 10(3):283-301. PubMed ID: 11167052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Truth Before and After: Brain Potentials Reveal Automatic Activation of Event Knowledge during Sentence Comprehension.
    Nieuwland MS
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 27(11):2215-28. PubMed ID: 26244719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Right words and left words: electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing.
    Federmeier KD; Kutas M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1999 Oct; 8(3):373-92. PubMed ID: 10556614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Revisiting the incremental effects of context on word processing: Evidence from single-word event-related brain potentials.
    Payne BR; Lee CL; Federmeier KD
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1456-69. PubMed ID: 26311477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The costs of being certain: Brain potential evidence for linguistic preactivation in sentence processing.
    Freunberger D; Roehm D
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Jun; 54(6):824-832. PubMed ID: 28240780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neural Evidence for the Prediction of Animacy Features during Language Comprehension: Evidence from MEG and EEG Representational Similarity Analysis.
    Wang L; Wlotko E; Alexander E; Schoot L; Kim M; Warnke L; Kuperberg GR
    J Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 40(16):3278-3291. PubMed ID: 32161141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Readers scrutinize lexical familiarity only in the absence of expectations: Evidence from lexicality effects on event-related potentials.
    Caliskan N; Milligan S; Schotter ER
    Brain Lang; 2023 Mar; 238():105232. PubMed ID: 36803853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials.
    Van Petten C; Kutas M
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jul; 18(4):380-93. PubMed ID: 2381317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How struggling adult readers use contextual information when comprehending speech: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Ng S; Payne BR; Stine-Morrow EAL; Federmeier KD
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Mar; 125():1-9. PubMed ID: 29408148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Resisting false recognition: An ERP study of lure discrimination.
    Morcom AM
    Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 1624():336-348. PubMed ID: 26256253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Event-related potentials show that parafoveal vision is insufficient for semantic integration.
    Schotter ER; Milligan S; Estevez VM
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Jul; 60(7):e14246. PubMed ID: 36811523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.