These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31555592)

  • 1. Structural Variants as a Basis for Targeted Therapies in Hematological Malignancies.
    Schütte J; Reusch J; Khandanpour C; Eisfeld C
    Front Oncol; 2019; 9():839. PubMed ID: 31555592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Structural variations in plant genomes.
    Saxena RK; Edwards D; Varshney RK
    Brief Funct Genomics; 2014 Jul; 13(4):296-307. PubMed ID: 24907366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Geographic distribution and adaptive significance of genomic structural variants: an anthropological genetics perspective.
    Eaaswarkhanth M; Pavlidis P; Gokcumen O
    Hum Biol; 2014; 86(4):260-75. PubMed ID: 25959693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DNA Repair and Chromosomal Translocations.
    Bohlander SK; Kakadia PM
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 2015; 200():1-37. PubMed ID: 26376870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Role of Structural Variation in Adaptation and Evolution of Yeast and Other Fungi.
    Gorkovskiy A; Verstrepen KJ
    Genes (Basel); 2021 May; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 34066718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Germline Structural Variations in Cancer Predisposition Genes.
    Pócza T; Grolmusz VK; Papp J; Butz H; Patócs A; Bozsik A
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():634217. PubMed ID: 33936164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. svclassify: a method to establish benchmark structural variant calls.
    Parikh H; Mohiyuddin M; Lam HY; Iyer H; Chen D; Pratt M; Bartha G; Spies N; Losert W; Zook JM; Salit M
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():64. PubMed ID: 26772178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constrained variant detection with SPaRC: Sparsity, parental relatedness, and coverage.
    Banuelos M; Almanza R; Adhikari L; Marcia RF; Sindi S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():3490-3493. PubMed ID: 28269051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Insights into structural variations and genome rearrangements in prokaryotic genomes.
    Periwal V; Scaria V
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jan; 31(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 25189783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gustaf: Detecting and correctly classifying SVs in the NGS twilight zone.
    Trappe K; Emde AK; Ehrlich HC; Reinert K
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Dec; 30(24):3484-90. PubMed ID: 25028727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structural variation in the 3D genome.
    Spielmann M; Lupiáñez DG; Mundlos S
    Nat Rev Genet; 2018 Jul; 19(7):453-467. PubMed ID: 29692413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From cytogenetics to cytogenomics: whole-genome sequencing as a first-line test comprehensively captures the diverse spectrum of disease-causing genetic variation underlying intellectual disability.
    Lindstrand A; Eisfeldt J; Pettersson M; Carvalho CMB; Kvarnung M; Grigelioniene G; Anderlid BM; Bjerin O; Gustavsson P; Hammarsjö A; Georgii-Hemming P; Iwarsson E; Johansson-Soller M; Lagerstedt-Robinson K; Lieden A; Magnusson M; Martin M; Malmgren H; Nordenskjöld M; Norling A; Sahlin E; Stranneheim H; Tham E; Wincent J; Ygberg S; Wedell A; Wirta V; Nordgren A; Lundin J; Nilsson D
    Genome Med; 2019 Nov; 11(1):68. PubMed ID: 31694722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals Diverse Models of Structural Variations in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Cheng C; Zhou Y; Li H; Xiong T; Li S; Bi Y; Kong P; Wang F; Cui H; Li Y; Fang X; Yan T; Li Y; Wang J; Yang B; Zhang L; Jia Z; Song B; Hu X; Yang J; Qiu H; Zhang G; Liu J; Xu E; Shi R; Zhang Y; Liu H; He C; Zhao Z; Qian Y; Rong R; Han Z; Zhang Y; Luo W; Wang J; Peng S; Yang X; Li X; Li L; Fang H; Liu X; Ma L; Chen Y; Guo S; Chen X; Xi Y; Li G; Liang J; Yang X; Guo J; Jia J; Li Q; Cheng X; Zhan Q; Cui Y
    Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Feb; 98(2):256-74. PubMed ID: 26833333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resolving complex structural genomic rearrangements using a randomized approach.
    Zhao X; Emery SB; Myers B; Kidd JM; Mills RE
    Genome Biol; 2016 Jun; 17(1):126. PubMed ID: 27287201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genome-Wide Study of Structural Variants in Bovine Holstein, Montbéliarde and Normande Dairy Breeds.
    Boussaha M; Esquerré D; Barbieri J; Djari A; Pinton A; Letaief R; Salin G; Escudié F; Roulet A; Fritz S; Samson F; Grohs C; Bernard M; Klopp C; Boichard D; Rocha D
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135931. PubMed ID: 26317361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Malignant hematopoietic cell lines: in vitro models for the study of MLL gene alterations.
    Drexler HG; Quentmeier H; MacLeod RA
    Leukemia; 2004 Feb; 18(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 14671638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MLL-SEPTIN gene fusions in hematological malignancies.
    Cerveira N; Bizarro S; Teixeira MR
    Biol Chem; 2011 Aug; 392(8-9):713-24. PubMed ID: 21714766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genome instability in the context of chromatin structure and fragile sites.
    Bartova E; Galiova G; Legartova S; Stixova L; Jugova A; Kozubek S
    Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr; 2010; 20(3):181-94. PubMed ID: 21175410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SVInterpreter: A Comprehensive Topologically Associated Domain-Based Clinical Outcome Prediction Tool for Balanced and Unbalanced Structural Variants.
    Fino J; Marques B; Dong Z; David D
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():757170. PubMed ID: 34925449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.