These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31556642)

  • 1. Theory protection in associative learning: Humans maintain certain beliefs in a manner that violates prediction error.
    Spicer SG; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Jones PM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(2):151-161. PubMed ID: 31556642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protecting the Rescorla-Wagner (1972) theory: A reply to Spicer et al. (2020).
    Chan YY; Westbrook RF; Holmes NM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2021 Apr; 47(2):211-215. PubMed ID: 34264725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Theory protection: Do humans protect existing associative links?
    Spicer SG; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Blake KL; Jones PM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2022 Jan; 48(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 35143242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of uncertainty in regulating associative change.
    Chan YY; Lee JC; Fam JP; Westbrook RF; Holmes NM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2024 Apr; 50(2):77-98. PubMed ID: 38587939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uncertainty and blocking in human causal learning.
    Jones PM; Zaksaite T; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):111-124. PubMed ID: 30604999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A combination of common and individual error terms is not needed to explain associative changes when cues with different training histories are conditioned in compound: A review of Rescorla's compound test procedure.
    Holmes NM; Chan YY; Westbrook RF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):242-256. PubMed ID: 30945928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using unobserved causes to explain unexpected outcomes: The effect of existing causal knowledge on protection from extinction by a hidden cause.
    Chow JYL; Lee JC; Lovibond PF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jul; 50(7):1167-1185. PubMed ID: 38095948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absence of differential protection from extinction in human causal learning.
    George DN; Haddon JE; Griffiths O
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2024 Jul; 50(3):161-185. PubMed ID: 38647466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pupil dilation indicates the coding of past prediction errors: Evidence for attentional learning theory.
    Koenig S; Uengoer M; Lachnit H
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Apr; 55(4):. PubMed ID: 29023832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learned changes in outcome associability.
    Quigley MC; Eatherington CJ; Haselgrove M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):209-221. PubMed ID: 28627301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The onset of uncertainty facilitates the learning of new associations by increasing attention to cues.
    Easdale LC; Le Pelley ME; Beesley T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 28766369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural correlates of cue predictiveness during intentional and incidental associative learning: A time-frequency study.
    Do Carmo-Blanco N; Allen JJB
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Sep; 143():80-87. PubMed ID: 31254544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing the automaticity of an attentional bias towards predictive cues in human associative learning.
    Luque D; Molinero S; Jevtović M; Beesley T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 May; 73(5):762-780. PubMed ID: 31826714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The redundancy effect is related to a lack of conditioned inhibition: Evidence from a task in which excitation and inhibition are symmetrical.
    Zaksaite T; Jones PM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Feb; 73(2):260-278. PubMed ID: 31498020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The outcome predictability bias is evident in overt attention.
    Griffiths O; Le Pelley ME
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jul; 45(3):290-300. PubMed ID: 31070432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Associative history affects the associative change undergone by both presented and absent cues in human causal learning.
    LePelley ME; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Jan; 30(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 14709116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surprise and change: variations in the strength of present and absent cues in causal learning.
    Wasserman EA; Castro L
    Learn Behav; 2005 May; 33(2):131-46. PubMed ID: 16075834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dorsolateral striatum is critical for the expression of surprise-induced enhancements in cue associability.
    Asem JS; Schiffino FL; Holland PC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 42(5):2203-13. PubMed ID: 26108257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Elaboration of a model of Pavlovian learning and performance: HeiDI.
    Honey RC; Dwyer DM; Iliescu AF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):170-184. PubMed ID: 32730077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Explaining learned predictiveness: Roles of attention and integration of associative structures.
    Rodríguez G; Hall G
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 30945925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.