These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31556643)

  • 1. Directional cues and landmark configurations: The effect of rotating one set of landmarks relative to another.
    Civile C; Chamizo VD; Artigas AA; McLaren IPL
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jan; 46(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 31556643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Navigation with two landmarks in rats (Rattus norvegicus): the role of landmark salience.
    Rodrigo T; Gimeno E; Ayguasanosa M; Chamizo VD
    J Comp Psychol; 2014 Nov; 128(4):378-86. PubMed ID: 24749502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Involvement of the hippocampus and associative parietal cortex in the use of proximal and distal landmarks for navigation.
    Save E; Poucet B
    Behav Brain Res; 2000 May; 109(2):195-206. PubMed ID: 10762689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lesions of the dorsal tegmental nuclei disrupt control of navigation by distal landmarks in cued, directional, and place variants of the Morris water task.
    Clark BJ; Rice JP; Akers KG; Candelaria-Cook FT; Taube JS; Hamilton DA
    Behav Neurosci; 2013 Aug; 127(4):566-81. PubMed ID: 23731069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generalization decrement and not overshadowing by associative competition among pairs of landmarks in a navigation task.
    Chamizo VD; Rodríguez CA; Espinet A; Mackintosh NJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jul; 38(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 22823419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gender differences in landmark learning for virtual navigation: the role of distance to a goal.
    Chamizo VD; Artigas AA; Sansa J; Banterla F
    Behav Processes; 2011 Sep; 88(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 21736927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Competition between landmarks in spatial learning: the role of proximity to the goal.
    Chamizo VD; Manteiga RD; Rodrigo T; Mackintosh NJ
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jan; 71(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 16338101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning efficiency: The influence of cue salience during spatial navigation.
    Farina FR; Burke T; Coyle D; Jeter K; McGee M; O'Connell J; Taheny D; Commins S
    Behav Processes; 2015 Jul; 116():17-27. PubMed ID: 25921836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Entorhinal cortex lesions impair the use of distal but not proximal landmarks during place navigation in the rat.
    Parron C; Poucet B; Save E
    Behav Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 154(2):345-52. PubMed ID: 15313022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wild rufous hummingbirds use local landmarks to return to rewarded locations.
    Pritchard DJ; Scott RD; Healy SD; Hurly AT
    Behav Processes; 2016 Jan; 122():59-66. PubMed ID: 26551275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Generalisation decrement and not overshadowing by associative competition among pairs of landmarks in a navigation task with humans.
    Sansa J; Aznar-Casanova JA; Rodríguez CA; Chamizo VD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):251-262. PubMed ID: 29516770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cue combination used to update the navigator's self-localization, not the home location.
    Zhang L; Mou W; Lei X; Du Y
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Dec; 46(12):2314-2339. PubMed ID: 31789563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of spatial stability and cue type on spatial learning: Implications for theories of parallel memory systems.
    Buckley MG; Austen JM; Myles LAM; Smith S; Ihssen N; Lew AR; McGregor A
    Cognition; 2021 Sep; 214():104802. PubMed ID: 34225248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of landmark salience in a navigation task: an additive effect between its components.
    Chamizo VD; Rodrigo T; Peris JM; Grau M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 16834501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cue integration in spatial search for jointly learned landmarks but not for separately learned landmarks.
    Du Y; McMillan N; Madan CR; Spetch ML; Mou W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1857-1871. PubMed ID: 28504533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lesions of the hippocampus or dorsolateral striatum disrupt distinct aspects of spatial navigation strategies based on proximal and distal information in a cued variant of the Morris water task.
    Rice JP; Wallace DG; Hamilton DA
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Aug; 289():105-17. PubMed ID: 25907746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distal landmarks and hippocampal place cells: effects of relative translation versus rotation.
    Knierim JJ; Rao G
    Hippocampus; 2003; 13(5):604-17. PubMed ID: 12921350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial integration with rats.
    Chamizo VD; Rodrigo T; Mackintosh NJ
    Learn Behav; 2006 Nov; 34(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 17330524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Seeing the forest before the trees-spatial orientation in freshwater stingrays (Potamotrygon motoro) in a hole-board task.
    Schluessel V; Herzog H; Scherpenstein M
    Behav Processes; 2015 Oct; 119():105-15. PubMed ID: 26253033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory cues support place navigation in rats when associated with a visual cue.
    Rossier J; Haeberli C; Schenk F
    Behav Brain Res; 2000 Dec; 117(1-2):209-14. PubMed ID: 11099774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.