174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31556840)
1. How Do Women Interpret the NHS Information Leaflet about Cervical Cancer Screening?
Okan Y; Petrova D; Smith SG; Lesic V; Bruine de Bruin W
Med Decis Making; 2019 Oct; 39(7):738-754. PubMed ID: 31556840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Acceptability of a standalone written leaflet for the National Health Service for England Targeted Lung Health Check Programme: A concurrent, think-aloud study.
Jallow M; Black G; van Os S; Baldwin DR; Brain KE; Donnelly M; Janes SM; Kurtidu C; McCutchan G; Robb KA; Ruparel M; Quaife SL
Health Expect; 2022 Aug; 25(4):1776-1788. PubMed ID: 35475542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women's decision-making: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Carles M; Martínez-Alonso M; Pons A; Pérez-Lacasta MJ; Perestelo-Pérez L; Sala M; Vidal C; Garcia M; Toledo-Chávarri A; Codern N; Feijoo-Cid M; Romero A; Pla R; Soler-González J; Castells X; Rué M;
Trials; 2017 Sep; 18(1):426. PubMed ID: 28899412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think-aloud study.
Smith SG; Vart G; Wolf MS; Obichere A; Baker HJ; Raine R; Wardle J; von Wagner C
Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):703-14. PubMed ID: 23910930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cross-sectional survey assessing factors associated with reading cancer screening information: previous screening behaviour, demographics and decision-making style.
Ghanouni A; Renzi C; Waller J
BMC Public Health; 2017 Apr; 17(1):327. PubMed ID: 28420378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Information and cervical screening: a qualitative study of women's awareness, understanding and information needs about HPV.
Goldsmith MR; Bankhead CR; Kehoe ST; Marsh G; Austoker J
J Med Screen; 2007; 14(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 17362569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
Perrenoud B; Velonaki VS; Bodenmann P; Ramelet AS
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The development and testing of a brief ('gist-based') supplementary colorectal cancer screening information leaflet.
Smith SG; Wolf MS; Obichere A; Raine R; Wardle J; von Wagner C
Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Dec; 93(3):619-25. PubMed ID: 24007765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How is cervical cancer screening information communicated in UK websites? Cross-sectional analysis of content and quantitative presentation formats.
Okan Y; Smith SG; Bruine de Bruin W
BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e029551. PubMed ID: 31662361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of different educational interventions on psychosocial well-being of women with a positive high-risk human papillomavirus and normal cervical cytology: a randomised trial.
Ngu SF; Wei N; Kwan TTC; Chu MMY; Tse KY; Chan KKL; Ngan HYS
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Jun; 39(2):146-155. PubMed ID: 28391730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of numerical information on risk knowledge regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among schoolgirls: a randomised controlled trial.
Steckelberg A; Albrecht M; Kezle A; Kasper J; Mühlhauser I
Ger Med Sci; 2013; 11():Doc15. PubMed ID: 24198750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How does information on the harms and benefits of cervical cancer screening alter the intention to be screened?: a randomized survey of Norwegian women.
Iyer AL; Bundorf MK; Gyrd-Hansen D; Goldhaber-Fiebert JD; Cyr PR; Sønbø Kristiansen I
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2019 Mar; 28(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29595751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A mixed-methods study to evaluate the acceptability of information leaflets for breast cancer screening.
Fernández-Feito A; Canga-Gutiérrez C; Paz-Zulueta M
J Clin Nurs; 2021 Jun; 30(11-12):1760-1772. PubMed ID: 33655613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of a pre-notification leaflet to encourage uptake of cervical screening at first invitation: a qualitative study.
Sadler L; Albrow R; Shelton R; Kitchener H; Brabin L
Health Educ Res; 2013 Oct; 28(5):793-802. PubMed ID: 23111151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What do young women below national screening age in England think about cervical cancer and cervical screening? A qualitative study.
Groves S; Brooks J
J Clin Nurs; 2022 Jun; 31(11-12):1588-1597. PubMed ID: 34418192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What do European women know about their female cancer risks and cancer screening? A cross-sectional online intervention survey in five European countries.
Wegwarth O; Widschwendter M; Cibula D; Sundström K; Portuesi R; Lein I; Rebitschek FG;
BMJ Open; 2018 Dec; 8(12):e023789. PubMed ID: 30593552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing perceived clarity of information on overdiagnosis used for breast and prostate cancer screening in England: an experimental survey.
Ghanouni A; Renzi C; McBride E; Waller J
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e015955. PubMed ID: 28827249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychological Impact of Primary Screening (PIPS) for HPV: a protocol for a cross-sectional evaluation within the NHS cervical screening programme.
McBride E; Marlow L; Forster AS; Moss S; Myles J; Kitchener H; Patnick J; Waller J
BMJ Open; 2016 Dec; 6(12):e014356. PubMed ID: 28011816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of educational leaflets and questions on knowledge of contraception in women taking the combined contraceptive pill: randomised controlled trial.
Little P; Griffin S; Kelly J; Dickson N; Sadler C
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7149):1948-52. PubMed ID: 9641933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
