175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31556840)
21. Psychological Impact of Primary Screening (PIPS) for HPV: a protocol for a cross-sectional evaluation within the NHS cervical screening programme.
McBride E; Marlow L; Forster AS; Moss S; Myles J; Kitchener H; Patnick J; Waller J
BMJ Open; 2016 Dec; 6(12):e014356. PubMed ID: 28011816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of educational leaflets and questions on knowledge of contraception in women taking the combined contraceptive pill: randomised controlled trial.
Little P; Griffin S; Kelly J; Dickson N; Sadler C
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7149):1948-52. PubMed ID: 9641933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Informed decision-making based on a leaflet in the context of prostate cancer screening.
Dierks T; Heijnsdijk EAM; Korfage IJ; Roobol MJ; de Koning HJ
Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Aug; 102(8):1483-1489. PubMed ID: 31014933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of numerical information on intention to participate in cervical screening among women offered HPV vaccination: a randomised study.
Hestbech MS; Gyrd-Hansen D; Kragstrup J; Siersma V; Brodersen J
Scand J Prim Health Care; 2016 Dec; 34(4):401-419. PubMed ID: 27845597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Does the English Breast Screening Programme's information leaflet improve women's knowledge about mammography screening? A before and after questionnaire survey.
Webster P; Austoker J
J Public Health (Oxf); 2007 Jun; 29(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 17327363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women's decision making: The InforMa randomised controlled trial.
Pérez-Lacasta MJ; Martínez-Alonso M; Garcia M; Sala M; Perestelo-Pérez L; Vidal C; Codern-Bové N; Feijoo-Cid M; Toledo-Chávarri A; Cardona À; Pons A; Carles-Lavila M; Rue M;
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214057. PubMed ID: 30913217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Muslim immigrant women's views on cervical cancer screening and HPV self-sampling in Ontario, Canada.
Vahabi M; Lofters A
BMC Public Health; 2016 Aug; 16(1):868. PubMed ID: 27557928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Processing fluency effect of a leaflet for breast and cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled study in Japan.
Okuhara T; Ishikawa H; Goto E; Okada M; Kato M; Kiuchi T
Psychol Health Med; 2018 Dec; 23(10):1250-1260. PubMed ID: 30101600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Preconceptions influence women's perceptions of information on breast cancer screening: a qualitative study.
Henriksen MJ; Guassora AD; Brodersen J
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():404. PubMed ID: 26336075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Changes in Knowledge and Beliefs About Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer Screening Intervals in Low-Income Women After an Educational Intervention.
Roland KB; Benard VB; Greek A; Hawkins NA; Lin L
J Prim Care Community Health; 2016 Apr; 7(2):88-95. PubMed ID: 26763304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Information needs among women taking part in primary HPV screening in England: a content analysis.
Marlow L; Forster AS; McBride E; Rockliffe L; Kitchener H; Waller J
BMJ Open; 2020 Dec; 10(12):e044630. PubMed ID: 33323451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Does changing the order of threat and efficacy information influence the persuasiveness of threat messages?
Hall S; Bishop AJ; Marteau TM
Br J Health Psychol; 2006 May; 11(Pt 2):333-43. PubMed ID: 16643703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Women's experiences of the renewed National Cervical Screening Program in Australia 12 months following implementation: a qualitative study.
Dodd RH; Mac OA; McCaffery KJ
BMJ Open; 2020 Jul; 10(7):e039041. PubMed ID: 32665351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Women's knowledge of and attitudes toward cervical cancer and cervical cancer screening in Zanzibar, Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.
Weng Q; Jiang J; Haji FM; Nondo LH; Zhou H
BMC Cancer; 2020 Jan; 20(1):63. PubMed ID: 31992250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. "Cervical cancer screening: awareness is not enough". Understanding barriers to screening among women in West Cameroon-a qualitative study using focus groups.
Datchoua Moukam AM; Embolo Owono MS; Kenfack B; Vassilakos P; Petignat P; Sormani J; Schmidt NC
Reprod Health; 2021 Jul; 18(1):147. PubMed ID: 34243778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect on compliance of a health education leaflet in colorectal cancer screening in general practice in central England.
Hart AR; Barone TL; Gay SP; Inglis A; Griffin L; Tallon CA; Mayberry JF
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1997 Apr; 51(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 9196650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. How do women who choose not to participate in population-based cervical cancer screening reason about their decision?
Blomberg K; Ternestedt BM; Törnberg S; Tishelman C
Psychooncology; 2008 Jun; 17(6):561-9. PubMed ID: 17886262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Decision-making about cervical screening in a heterogeneous sample of nonparticipants: A qualitative interview study.
Marlow LAV; Chorley AJ; Rockliffe L; Waller J
Psychooncology; 2018 Oct; 27(10):2488-2493. PubMed ID: 30095862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Do media reports and public brochures facilitate informed decision making about cervical cancer prevention?].
Neumeyer-Gromen A; Bodemer N; Müller SM; Gigerenzer G
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2011 Nov; 54(11):1197-210. PubMed ID: 22015792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. What Australian women want and when they want it: cervical screening testing preferences, decision-making styles and information needs.
Dieng M; Trevena L; Turner RM; Wadolowski M; McCaffery K
Health Expect; 2013 Jun; 16(2):177-88. PubMed ID: 21726363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
