These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31556854)

  • 1. Computational Strategy Revealing the Structural Determinant of Ligand Selectivity towards Highly Similar Protein Targets.
    Wang H; Gao Y; Wang J; Cheng M
    Curr Drug Targets; 2020; 21(1):76-88. PubMed ID: 31556854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. HPC Analysis of Multiple Binding Sites Communication and Allosteric Modulations in Drug Design: The HSP Case Study.
    Chiappori F; Milanesi L; Merelli I
    Curr Drug Targets; 2016; 17(14):1610-1625. PubMed ID: 26648062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computational Tools for Allosteric Drug Discovery: Site Identification and Focus Library Design.
    Huang W; Nussinov R; Zhang J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():439-446. PubMed ID: 27914066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discovery of hidden allosteric sites as novel targets for allosteric drug design.
    Lu S; Ji M; Ni D; Zhang J
    Drug Discov Today; 2018 Feb; 23(2):359-365. PubMed ID: 29030241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational modeling approaches to quantitative structure-binding kinetics relationships in drug discovery.
    De Benedetti PG; Fanelli F
    Drug Discov Today; 2018 Jul; 23(7):1396-1406. PubMed ID: 29574212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrated In Silico Fragment-Based Drug Design: Case Study with Allosteric Modulators on Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5.
    Bian Y; Feng Z; Yang P; Xie XQ
    AAPS J; 2017 Jul; 19(4):1235-1248. PubMed ID: 28560482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational Methods Used in Hit-to-Lead and Lead Optimization Stages of Structure-Based Drug Discovery.
    Heifetz A; Southey M; Morao I; Townsend-Nicholson A; Bodkin MJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():375-394. PubMed ID: 29188574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Importance of molecular computer modeling in anticancer drug development.
    Geromichalos GD
    J BUON; 2007 Sep; 12 Suppl 1():S101-18. PubMed ID: 17935268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protein-protein interaction inhibitors: advances in anticancer drug design.
    Ferreira LG; Oliva G; Andricopulo AD
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2016 Oct; 11(10):957-68. PubMed ID: 27554357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Profiling the structural determinants for the selectivity of representative factor-Xa and thrombin inhibitors using combined ligand-based and structure-based approaches.
    Bhunia SS; Roy KK; Saxena AK
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Aug; 51(8):1966-85. PubMed ID: 21761917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Druggable protein interaction sites are more predisposed to surface pocket formation than the rest of the protein surface.
    Johnson DK; Karanicolas J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(3):e1002951. PubMed ID: 23505360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrated Computational Approaches and Tools forAllosteric Drug Discovery.
    Sheik Amamuddy O; Veldman W; Manyumwa C; Khairallah A; Agajanian S; Oluyemi O; Verkhivker G; Tastan Bishop O
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Jan; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 32013012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protein binding site analysis for drug discovery using a computational fragment-based method.
    Ludington JL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1289():145-54. PubMed ID: 25709039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computational methodologies for compound database searching that utilize experimental protein-ligand interaction information.
    Tan L; Batista J; Bajorath J
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2010 Sep; 76(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 20636330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Current and Future Challenges in GPCR Drug Discovery.
    Topiol S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():1-21. PubMed ID: 29188556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Molecular Dynamics Simulation and Prediction of Druggable Binding Sites.
    Feng T; Barakat K
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():87-103. PubMed ID: 29594769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational Modeling of the Hsp90 Interactions with Cochaperones and Small-Molecule Inhibitors.
    Verkhivker GM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1709():253-273. PubMed ID: 29177665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A molecular-modeling toolbox aimed at bridging the gap between medicinal chemistry and computational sciences.
    Eid S; Zalewski A; Smieško M; Ernst B; Vedani A
    Int J Mol Sci; 2013 Jan; 14(1):684-700. PubMed ID: 23344039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Opportunities and Challenges in the Discovery of Allosteric Modulators of GPCRs.
    Bartuzi D; Kaczor AA; Matosiuk D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():297-319. PubMed ID: 29188568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving virtual screening of G protein-coupled receptors via ligand-directed modeling.
    Coudrat T; Simms J; Christopoulos A; Wootten D; Sexton PM
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Nov; 13(11):e1005819. PubMed ID: 29131821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.