These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31557174)
1. Predicting spinal profile using 3D non-contact surface scanning: Changes in surface topography as a predictor of internal spinal alignment. Little JP; Rayward L; Pearcy MJ; Izatt MT; Green D; Labrom RD; Askin GN PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222453. PubMed ID: 31557174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting spinal column profile from surface topography via 3D non-contact surface scanning. Rayward L; Pearcy M; Izatt M; Green D; Labrom R; Askin G; Little JP PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0282634. PubMed ID: 36952526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters. Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Difference in whole spinal alignment between supine and standing positions in patients with adult spinal deformity using a new comparison method with slot-scanning three-dimensional X-ray imager and computed tomography through digital reconstructed radiography. Hasegawa K; Okamoto M; Hatsushikano S; Caseiro G; Watanabe K BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Dec; 19(1):437. PubMed ID: 30522465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Normative 3D opto-electronic stereo-photogrammetric posture and spine morphology data in young healthy adult population. D'Amico M; Kinel E; Roncoletta P PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179619. PubMed ID: 28640899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of thoracic spinal curvatures in static postures using spatially tracked 3D ultrasound volumes: a proof-of-concept study. Meszaros-Beller L; Antico M; Fontanarosa D; Pivonka P Phys Eng Sci Med; 2023 Mar; 46(1):197-208. PubMed ID: 36625994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Soft tissue artefacts of the human back: comparison of the sagittal curvature of the spine measured using skin markers and an open upright MRI. Zemp R; List R; Gülay T; Elsig JP; Naxera J; Taylor WR; Lorenzetti S PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e95426. PubMed ID: 24748013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and reliability of coronal and sagittal spinal curvature data based on patient-specific three-dimensional models created by the EOS 2D/3D imaging system. Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T Spine J; 2012 Nov; 12(11):1052-9. PubMed ID: 23102842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of spinal curvature parameters as determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method and the Cobb method in children with scoliosis. Takács M; Orlovits Z; Jáger B; Kiss RM PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200245. PubMed ID: 29985957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of spine morphology on intervertebral disc loads and stresses in asymptomatic adults: implications for the ideal spine. Keller TS; Colloca CJ; Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Janik TJ Spine J; 2005; 5(3):297-309. PubMed ID: 15863086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Sagittal Balance of the Spine--Clinical Importance and Radiographic Assessment]. Decker S; Müller CW; Omar M; Krettek C; Schwab F; Trobisch PD Z Orthop Unfall; 2016 Apr; 154(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 26670303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using Skin Markers for Spinal Curvature Quantification in Main Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Explorative Radiographic Study. Schmid S; Studer D; Hasler CC; Romkes J; Taylor WR; Brunner R; Lorenzetti S PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135689. PubMed ID: 26270557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient-specific 3D models created by 3D imaging system or bi-planar imaging coupled with Moiré-Fringe projections: a comparative study of accuracy and reliability on spinal curvatures and vertebral rotation data. Hocquelet A; Cornelis F; Jirot A; Castaings L; de Sèze M; Hauger O Eur Spine J; 2016 Oct; 25(10):3154-3161. PubMed ID: 27323963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in male and female spino-pelvic alignment in asymptomatic young adults: a three-dimensional analysis using upright low-dose digital biplanar X-rays. Janssen MM; Drevelle X; Humbert L; Skalli W; Castelein RM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):E826-32. PubMed ID: 19927088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of 3D surface scanners for clinical torso and spinal deformity assessment. Grant CA; Johnston M; Adam CJ; Little JP Med Eng Phys; 2019 Jan; 63():63-71. PubMed ID: 30467027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are spinal or paraspinal anatomic markers helpful for vertebral numbering and diagnosing lumbosacral transitional vertebrae? Tokgoz N; Ucar M; Erdogan AB; Kilic K; Ozcan C Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 24644411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative analysis of spinal curvature in 3D: application to CT images of normal spine. Vrtovec T; Likar B; Pernus F Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1895-908. PubMed ID: 18364545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical and stereoradiographic analysis of adult spinal deformity with and without rotatory subluxation. Ferrero E; Lafage R; Challier V; Diebo B; Guigui P; Mazda K; Schwab F; Skalli W; Lafage V Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Sep; 101(5):613-8. PubMed ID: 26194209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sagittal Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Profiles in Upright Standing and Lying Prone Positions Among Healthy Subjects: Influence of Various Biometric Features. Salem W; Coomans Y; Brismée JM; Klein P; Sobczak S; Dugailly PM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Aug; 40(15):E900-8. PubMed ID: 25839386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]