These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31557227)

  • 1. Mapping online hate: A scientometric analysis on research trends and hotspots in research on online hate.
    Waqas A; Salminen J; Jung SG; Almerekhi H; Jansen BJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222194. PubMed ID: 31557227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Youth Exposure to Hate in the Online Space: An Exploratory Analysis.
    Harriman N; Shortland N; Su M; Cote T; Testa MA; Savoia E
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Nov; 17(22):. PubMed ID: 33212999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Moderation of Online Disinhibition and Sex on the Relationship Between Online Hate Victimization and Perpetration.
    Wachs S; Wright MF
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2019 May; 22(5):300-306. PubMed ID: 30945942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A curated dataset for hate speech detection on social media text.
    Mody D; Huang Y; Alves de Oliveira TE
    Data Brief; 2023 Feb; 46():108832. PubMed ID: 36605500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hidden resilience and adaptive dynamics of the global online hate ecology.
    Johnson NF; Leahy R; Restrepo NJ; Velasquez N; Zheng M; Manrique P; Devkota P; Wuchty S
    Nature; 2019 Sep; 573(7773):261-265. PubMed ID: 31435010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding the overlap between cyberbullying and cyberhate perpetration: Moderating effects of toxic online disinhibition.
    Wachs S; Wright MF; Vazsonyi AT
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2019 Jun; 29(3):179-188. PubMed ID: 31274229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Features for Hate? Using the Delphi Method to Explore Digital Determinants for Online Hate Perpetration and Possibilities for Intervention.
    Weber I; Vandebosch H; Poels K; Pabian S
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2023 Jul; 26(7):479-488. PubMed ID: 37104045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deep Learning Approaches for Cyberbullying Detection and Classification on Social Media.
    S N; M S; Chandrasekaran S; K M; Singh Pundir AK; R S; Lingaiah TB
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():2163458. PubMed ID: 35726285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reflections on hateful responses to research on hate in the United States.
    Medina R; Nicolosi E; Riley C; McNeally P
    Public Underst Sci; 2021 Aug; 30(6):797-806. PubMed ID: 33641493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Social media and online hate.
    Walther JB
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2022 Jun; 45():101298. PubMed ID: 35158213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The (moral) language of hate.
    Kennedy B; Golazizian P; Trager J; Atari M; Hoover J; Mostafazadeh Davani A; Dehghani M
    PNAS Nexus; 2023 Jul; 2(7):pgad210. PubMed ID: 37441615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors Associated with Online Hate Acceptance: A Cross-National Six-Country Study among Young Adults.
    Celuch M; Oksanen A; Räsänen P; Costello M; Blaya C; Zych I; Llorent VJ; Reichelmann A; Hawdon J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35010794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic detection of cyberbullying in social media text.
    Van Hee C; Jacobs G; Emmery C; Desmet B; Lefever E; Verhoeven B; De Pauw G; Daelemans W; Hoste V
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0203794. PubMed ID: 30296299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Targets of Online Hate: Examining Determinants of Victimization Among Young Finnish Facebook Users.
    Räsänen P; Hawdon J; Holkeri E; Keipi T; Näsi M; Oksanen A
    Violence Vict; 2016; 31(4):708-26. PubMed ID: 27302929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technology-Facilitated Sexual Violence: A Literature Review of Empirical Research.
    Henry N; Powell A
    Trauma Violence Abuse; 2018 Apr; 19(2):195-208. PubMed ID: 27311818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception of Hate Speech by the Public and Experts: Insights into Predictors of the Perceived Hate Speech Towards Migrants.
    Papcunová J; Martončik M; Fedáková D; Kentoš M; Adamkovič M
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37140462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Knowledge Domain and Emerging Trends on Echinococcosis Research: A Scientometric Analysis.
    Ma X; Zhang L; Wang J; Luo Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Mar; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 30857143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Us and them: identifying cyber hate on Twitter across multiple protected characteristics.
    Burnap P; Williams ML
    EPJ Data Sci; 2016; 5(1):11. PubMed ID: 32355598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disrupting hate: The effect of deplatforming hate organizations on their online audience.
    Thomas DR; Wahedi LA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Jun; 120(24):e2214080120. PubMed ID: 37276418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impulsivity, internalizing symptoms, and online group behavior as determinants of online hate.
    Kaakinen M; Sirola A; Savolainen I; Oksanen A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231052. PubMed ID: 32320402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.