These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31557228)

  • 1. Feed-forward visual processing suffices for coarse localization but fine-grained localization in an attention-demanding context needs feedback processing.
    Yoo SA; Tsotsos JK; Fallah M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0223166. PubMed ID: 31557228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual selective behavior can be triggered by a feed-forward process.
    VanRullen R; Koch C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Feb; 15(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 12676058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scene complexity modulates degree of feedback activity during object detection in natural scenes.
    Groen IIA; Jahfari S; Seijdel N; Ghebreab S; Lamme VAF; Scholte HS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Dec; 14(12):e1006690. PubMed ID: 30596644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultra-rapid object categorization in real-world scenes with top-down manipulations.
    Xu B; Kankanhalli MS; Zhao Q
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214444. PubMed ID: 30969988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hard-wired feed-forward visual mechanisms of the brain compensate for affine variations in object recognition.
    Karimi-Rouzbahani H; Bagheri N; Ebrahimpour R
    Neuroscience; 2017 May; 349():48-63. PubMed ID: 28245990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do target detection and target localization always go together? Extracting information from briefly presented displays.
    Carrigan AJ; Wardle SG; Rich AN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2685-2699. PubMed ID: 31218599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effective connectivity in the neural network underlying coarse-to-fine categorization of visual scenes. A dynamic causal modeling study.
    Kauffmann L; Chauvin A; Pichat C; Peyrin C
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Oct; 99():46-56. PubMed ID: 26232267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recurrent processing enhances visual awareness but is not necessary for fast categorization of natural scenes.
    Koivisto M; Kastrati G; Revonsuo A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 26(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 24047378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A bottom-up model of spatial attention predicts human error patterns in rapid scene recognition.
    Einhäuser W; Mundhenk TN; Baldi P; Koch C; Itti L
    J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):6.1-13. PubMed ID: 17997675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early interference of context congruence on object processing in rapid visual categorization of natural scenes.
    Joubert OR; Fize D; Rousselet GA; Fabre-Thorpe M
    J Vis; 2008 Oct; 8(13):11.1-18. PubMed ID: 19146341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bottom-up processing of curvilinear visual features is sufficient for animate/inanimate object categorization.
    Zachariou V; Del Giacco AC; Ungerleider LG; Yue X
    J Vis; 2018 Nov; 18(12):3. PubMed ID: 30458511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interaction of top-down and bottom-up processing in the fast visual analysis of natural scenes.
    Delorme A; Rousselet GA; Macé MJ; Fabre-Thorpe M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Apr; 19(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 15019707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional capture by incongruent object/background scenes in patients with Alzheimer disease.
    Lenoble Q; Corveleyn X; Szaffarczyk S; Pasquier F; Boucart M
    Cortex; 2018 Oct; 107():4-12. PubMed ID: 30006000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Top-down preparation modulates visual categorization but not subjective awareness of objects presented in natural backgrounds.
    Koivisto M; Kahila E
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():73-80. PubMed ID: 28202397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociable Neural Systems for Recognizing Places and Navigating through Them.
    Persichetti AS; Dilks DD
    J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 38(48):10295-10304. PubMed ID: 30348675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hysteresis in the dynamic perception of scenes and objects.
    Poltoratski S; Tong F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Oct; 143(5):1875-92. PubMed ID: 25150947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intention, attention and long-term memory for visual scenes: It all depends on the scenes.
    Evans KK; Baddeley A
    Cognition; 2018 Nov; 180():24-37. PubMed ID: 29981966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image interpretation by a single bottom-up top-down cycle.
    Epshtein B; Lifshitz I; Ullman S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Sep; 105(38):14298-303. PubMed ID: 18796607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus duration and diversity do not reverse the advantage for superordinate-level representations: the animal is seen before the bird.
    Poncet M; Fabre-Thorpe M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2014 May; 39(9):1508-16. PubMed ID: 24617612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Neural Dynamics of Attentional Selection in Natural Scenes.
    Kaiser D; Oosterhof NN; Peelen MV
    J Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 36(41):10522-10528. PubMed ID: 27733605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.