These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31557305)

  • 1. Induction of labor with high- or low-dosage oral misoprostol-A Danish descriptive retrospective cohort study 2015-16.
    Bendix JM; Friis Petersen J; Andersen BR; Bødker B; Løkkegaard EC
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Feb; 99(2):222-230. PubMed ID: 31557305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An audit of oral administration of Angusta® (misoprostol) 25 µg for induction of labor in 976 consecutive women with a singleton pregnancy in a university hospital in Denmark.
    Helmig RB; Hvidman LE
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Oct; 99(10):1396-1402. PubMed ID: 32311758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial.
    Hokkila E; Kruit H; Rahkonen L; Timonen S; Mattila M; Laatio L; Ordén MR; Uotila J; Luukkaala T; Tihtonen K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug; 98(8):1032-1039. PubMed ID: 30771243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Dällenbach P; Boulvain M; Viardot C; Irion O
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safe induction of labour with low-dose misoprostol, but less effective than the conventional dinoprostone regimen.
    Petersen JF; Bergholt T; Løkkegaard EC
    Dan Med J; 2013 Sep; 60(9):A4706. PubMed ID: 24001467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (1):CD000941. PubMed ID: 12535398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pilot study of labor induction with titrated oral misoprostol.
    Cheng SY; Chen TC
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 45(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 17175468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oral, vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for induction of labor.
    Bartusevicius A; Barcaite E; Nadisauskiene R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Oct; 91(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 16109419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
    Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.
    Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF 2-HOURLY 20 MCG ORAL MISOPROSTOL SOLUTION COMPARED TO STANDARD INTRAVENOUS OXYTOCIN IN LABOUR INDUCTION DUE TO PRE-LABOUR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM: A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL.
    Mbaluka CM; Kamau K; Karanja JG; Mugo N
    East Afr Med J; 2014 Sep; 91(9):303-10. PubMed ID: 26866082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concurrent use of Foley catheter and misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety.
    Lanka S; Surapaneni T; Nirmalan PK
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1527-33. PubMed ID: 24888911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with favorable cervical examinations.
    Wing DA; Fassett MJ; Guberman C; Tran S; Parrish A; Guinn D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-6. PubMed ID: 15284771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Slow-release vaginal insert of misoprostol versus orally administrated solution of misoprostol for the induction of labour in primiparous term pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial.
    Wallström T; Strandberg M; Gemzell-Danielsson K; Pilo C; Jarnbert-Pettersson H; Friman-Mathiasson M; Wiberg-Itzel E
    BJOG; 2019 Aug; 126(9):1148-1155. PubMed ID: 30989788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of delayed misoprostol dosing interval for induction of labor: a retrospective study.
    Harman Crowell EH; Crowell AM; Theiler RN
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Aug; 19(1):309. PubMed ID: 31455215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor.
    Rouzi AA; Alsahly N; Alamoudi R; Almansouri N; Alsinani N; Alkafy S; Rozzah R; Abduljabbar H
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 216(4):405.e1-405.e6. PubMed ID: 27986461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oral or Vaginal Misoprostol for Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery Risk.
    Handal-Orefice RC; Friedman AM; Chouinard SM; Eke AC; Feinberg B; Politch J; Iverson RE; Yarrington CD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 134(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 31188317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Excessive uterine activity accompanying induced labor.
    Crane JM; Young DC; Butt KD; Bennett KA; Hutchens D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 97(6):926-31. PubMed ID: 11384698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.