These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31557656)

  • 1. Genome-edited plants in the field.
    Metje-Sprink J; Sprink T; Hartung F
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2020 Feb; 61():1-6. PubMed ID: 31557656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genome editing in fruit, ornamental, and industrial crops.
    Ramirez-Torres F; Ghogare R; Stowe E; Cerdá-Bennasser P; Lobato-Gómez M; Williamson-Benavides BA; Giron-Calva PS; Hewitt S; Christou P; Dhingra A
    Transgenic Res; 2021 Aug; 30(4):499-528. PubMed ID: 33825100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. European Court of Justice delivers no justice to Europe on genome-edited crops.
    Schulman AH; Oksman-Caldentey KM; Teeri TH
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2020 Jan; 18(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 31246337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An Outlook on Global Regulatory Landscape for Genome-Edited Crops.
    Ahmad A; Munawar N; Khan Z; Qusmani AT; Khan SH; Jamil A; Ashraf S; Ghouri MZ; Aslam S; Mubarik MS; Munir A; Sultan Q; Abd-Elsalam KA; Qari SH
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Oct; 22(21):. PubMed ID: 34769204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regulatory approaches for genome edited agricultural plants in select countries and jurisdictions around the world.
    Entine J; Felipe MSS; Groenewald JH; Kershen DL; Lema M; McHughen A; Nepomuceno AL; Ohsawa R; Ordonio RL; Parrott WA; Quemada H; Ramage C; Slamet-Loedin I; Smyth SJ; Wray-Cahen D
    Transgenic Res; 2021 Aug; 30(4):551-584. PubMed ID: 33970411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion.
    Lassoued R; Macall DM; Hesseln H; Phillips PWB; Smyth SJ
    Transgenic Res; 2019 Apr; 28(2):247-256. PubMed ID: 30830581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Targeted modification of plant genomes for precision crop breeding.
    Hilscher J; Bürstmayr H; Stoger E
    Biotechnol J; 2017 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 27726285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Legislation governing genetically modified and genome-edited crops in Europe: the need for change.
    Halford NG
    J Sci Food Agric; 2019 Jan; 99(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 29952140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A future scenario of the global regulatory landscape regarding genome-edited crops.
    Ishii T; Araki M
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 27960622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perspectives on the Application of Genome-Editing Technologies in Crop Breeding.
    Hua K; Zhang J; Botella JR; Ma C; Kong F; Liu B; Zhu JK
    Mol Plant; 2019 Aug; 12(8):1047-1059. PubMed ID: 31260812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Europe's first and last field trial of gene-edited plants?
    Faure JD; Napier JA
    Elife; 2018 Dec; 7():. PubMed ID: 30558714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Managers' attitudes toward gene-editing technology and companies' R&D investment in gene-editing: the case of Chinese seed companies.
    Kang Y; Deng H; Pray C; Hu R
    GM Crops Food; 2022 Dec; 13(1):309-326. PubMed ID: 36382611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regulatory aspects of gene editing in Argentina.
    Lema MA
    Transgenic Res; 2019 Aug; 28(Suppl 2):147-150. PubMed ID: 31321697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genome editing of crops: A renewed opportunity for food security.
    Georges F; Ray H
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 28075688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. China's regulatory change toward genome-edited crops.
    Yang F; Zheng K; Yao Y
    Trends Biotechnol; 2024 Jul; 42(7):801-806. PubMed ID: 38160083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Crop Gene-Editing: Should We Bypass or Apply Existing GMO Policy?
    Ishii T
    Trends Plant Sci; 2018 Nov; 23(11):947-950. PubMed ID: 30241735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Plant Genome Editing and the Relevance of Off-Target Changes.
    Graham N; Patil GB; Bubeck DM; Dobert RC; Glenn KC; Gutsche AT; Kumar S; Lindbo JA; Maas L; May GD; Vega-Sanchez ME; Stupar RM; Morrell PL
    Plant Physiol; 2020 Aug; 183(4):1453-1471. PubMed ID: 32457089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EU legal proposal for genome-edited crops hints at a science-based approach.
    Dima O; Custers R; De Veirman L; Inzé D
    Trends Plant Sci; 2023 Dec; 28(12):1350-1353. PubMed ID: 37839926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Canadian regulatory aspects of gene editing technologies.
    Ellens KW; Levac D; Pearson C; Savoie A; Strand N; Louter J; Tibelius C
    Transgenic Res; 2019 Aug; 28(Suppl 2):165-168. PubMed ID: 31321700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evolving landscape around genome editing in agriculture: Many countries have exempted or move to exempt forms of genome editing from GMO regulation of crop plants.
    Schmidt SM; Belisle M; Frommer WB
    EMBO Rep; 2020 Jun; 21(6):e50680. PubMed ID: 32431018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.