177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31559708)
1. Does the Time Interval from Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy Affect the Postoperative Oncologic Outcomes in Korean Men?
Kim SJ; Ryu JH; Yang SO; Lee JK; Jung TY; Kim YB
J Korean Med Sci; 2019 Sep; 34(37):e234. PubMed ID: 31559708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New Prostate Cancer Grading System Predicts Long-term Survival Following Surgery for Gleason Score 8-10 Prostate Cancer.
Ham WS; Chalfin HJ; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Cheung C; Humphreys E; Partin AW; Han M
Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):907-912. PubMed ID: 27876305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The prognostic impact of downgrading and upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy among men with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer.
Jang WS; Koh DH; Kim J; Lee JS; Chung DY; Ham WS; Rha KH; Choi YD
Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1805-1810. PubMed ID: 31483062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative Statin Use at the Time of Radical Prostatectomy Is Not Associated With Biochemical Recurrence or Pathologic Upgrading.
Lyon TD; Turner RM; Yabes JG; Woldemichael E; Davies BJ; Jacobs BL; Nelson JB
Urology; 2016 Nov; 97():153-159. PubMed ID: 27516122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of Prostate Cancer Upgrading and Upstaging on Biochemical Recurrence and Cancer-Specific Survival.
Bakavičius A; Drevinskaitė M; Daniūnaitė K; Barisienė M; Jarmalaitė S; Jankevičius F
Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Feb; 56(2):. PubMed ID: 32033148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Postoperative upgrading of prostate cancer in men ≥75 years: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Herlemann A; Buchner A; Kretschmer A; Apfelbeck M; Stief CG; Gratzke C; Tritschler S
World J Urol; 2017 Oct; 35(10):1517-1524. PubMed ID: 28493044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in Korean patients with serum PSA ranges.
Lee HW; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Lee HM
J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Mar; 30(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 25729256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy specimen and survival after radical prostatectomy.
DeLancey JO; Wood DP; He C; Montgomery JS; Weizer AZ; Miller DC; Jacobs BL; Montie JE; Hollenbeck BK; Skolarus TA
Urology; 2013 Feb; 81(2):354-7. PubMed ID: 23374801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy.
Diaz M; Peabody JO; Kapoor V; Sammon J; Rogers CG; Stricker H; Lane Z; Gupta N; Bhandari M; Menon M
Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):1168-1176. PubMed ID: 24996687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pathologic outcomes for low-risk prostate cancer after delayed radical prostatectomy in the United States.
Weiner AB; Patel SG; Eggener SE
Urol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(4):164.e11-7. PubMed ID: 25624093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pathological Characteristics of Prostate Cancer in Men Aged < 50 Years Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: a Multi-Centre Study in Korea.
Chung MS; Shim M; Cho JS; Bang W; Kim SI; Cho SY; Rha KH; Hong SJ; Koo KC; Lee KS; Chung BH; Lee SH
J Korean Med Sci; 2019 Mar; 34(10):e78. PubMed ID: 30886549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immediate versus delayed radical prostatectomy: updated outcomes following active surveillance of prostate cancer.
Filippou P; Welty CJ; Cowan JE; Perez N; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):458-63. PubMed ID: 26138041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preoperative characteristics of men with unfavorable high-Gleason prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Pierorazio PM; Lin BM; Mullins JK; Hyndman ME; Schaeffer EM; Han M; Partin AW; Pavlovich CP
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 21664838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term radical prostatectomy outcomes among participants from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) Rotterdam.
Loeb S; Zhu X; Schroder FH; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1678-83. PubMed ID: 22998182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Aetiology and management of earlier vs later biochemical recurrence after retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Llukani E; Lepor H
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):505-510. PubMed ID: 28220652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Upgrading and upstaging of low-risk prostate cancer among Korean patients: a multicenter study.
Hwang I; Lim D; Jeong YB; Park SC; Noh JH; Kwon DD; Kang TW
Asian J Androl; 2015; 17(5):811-4. PubMed ID: 25578934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of robot-assisted and open retropubic radical prostatectomy for risk of biochemical progression in men with positive surgical margins.
Shapiro EY; Scarberry K; Patel T; Bergman A; Ahn JJ; Sahi N; RoyChoudhury A; Deutch I; McKiernan JM; Benson MC; Badani KK
J Endourol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 24044423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
