BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31560212)

  • 1. An analysis of cyclists' speed at combined pedestrian and cycle paths.
    Eriksson J; Forsman Å; Niska A; Gustafsson S; Sörensen G
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup3):56-61. PubMed ID: 31560212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scenarios of crashes involving light mopeds on urban bicycle paths.
    Davidse RJ; van Duijvenvoorde K; Boele-Vos MJ; Louwerse WJR; Stelling-Konczak A; Duivenvoorden CWAE; Algera AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():334-341. PubMed ID: 31200121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Traffic conflicts on bicycle paths: a systematic observation of behaviour from video.
    van der Horst AR; de Goede M; de Hair-Buijssen S; Methorst R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():358-68. PubMed ID: 23642307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speed choice and mental workload of elderly cyclists on e-bikes in simple and complex traffic situations: a field experiment.
    Vlakveld WP; Twisk D; Christoph M; Boele M; Sikkema R; Remy R; Schwab AL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jan; 74():97-106. PubMed ID: 25463949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying factors affecting the safety of mid-block bicycle lanes considering mixed 2-wheeled traffic flow.
    Bai L; Chan CY; Liu P; Xu C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Oct; 18(7):761-766. PubMed ID: 28326809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mapping fractures from traffic accidents in Sweden: How do cyclists compare to other road users?
    Meredith L; Kovaceva J; Bálint A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(3):209-214. PubMed ID: 32119567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risky riding: Naturalistic methods comparing safety behavior from conventional bicycle riders and electric bike riders.
    Langford BC; Chen J; Cherry CR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Sep; 82():220-6. PubMed ID: 26093098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A computational study on the basis for a safe speed limit for bicycles on shared paths considering the severity of pedestrian head injuries in bicyclist-pedestrian collisions.
    Paudel M; Yap FF; Rosli TBM; Tan KH; Xu H; Vahdati N; Butt H; Shiryayev O
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Oct; 176():106792. PubMed ID: 35952395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bicycle crashes in different riding environments in the Australian capital territory.
    De Rome L; Boufous S; Georgeson T; Senserrick T; Richardson D; Ivers R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 24279970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influencing factors of observed speed and rule compliance of speed-pedelec riders in high volume cycling areas: Implications for safety and legislation.
    Stelling A; Vlakveld W; Twisk D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106239. PubMed ID: 34130058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of speed, cyclists' age, pedaling frequency, and observer age on observers' time to arrival judgments of approaching bicycles and e-bikes.
    Schleinitz K; Petzoldt T; Krems JF; Gehlert T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jul; 92():113-21. PubMed ID: 27058264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. E-bikers' braking behavior: Results from a naturalistic cycling study.
    Huertas-Leyva P; Dozza M; Baldanzini N
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup3):62-67. PubMed ID: 31442089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of environmental factors on cycling speed on shared paths.
    Boufous S; Hatfield J; Grzebieta R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():171-176. PubMed ID: 28958631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Traveling by Bus Instead of Car on Urban Major Roads: Safety Benefits for Vehicle Occupants, Pedestrians, and Cyclists.
    Morency P; Strauss J; Pépin F; Tessier F; Grondines J
    J Urban Health; 2018 Apr; 95(2):196-207. PubMed ID: 29500736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A problem of the safety of vulnerable road users in Montenegro.
    Čabarkapa M
    Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot; 2018 Dec; 25(4):352-364. PubMed ID: 29400606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating conflict behaviours and characteristics in shared space for pedestrians, conventional bicycles and e-bikes.
    Liang X; Meng X; Zheng L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Aug; 158():106167. PubMed ID: 34053614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The road to recovery for vulnerable road users hospitalised for orthopaedic injury following an on-road crash.
    Devlin A; Beck B; Simpson PM; Ekegren CL; Giummarra MJ; Edwards ER; Cameron PA; Liew S; Oppy A; Richardson M; Page R; Gabbe BJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105279. PubMed ID: 31491683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distance between speed humps and pedestrian crossings: does it matter?
    Johansson C; Rosander P; Leden L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 Sep; 43(5):1846-51. PubMed ID: 21658513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Road accident fatality risks for "vulnerable" versus "protected" road users in northern Ghana.
    Damsere-Derry J; Palk G; King M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Oct; 18(7):736-743. PubMed ID: 28296466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanisms underlying cognitive conspicuity in the detection of cyclists by car drivers.
    Rogé J; Ndiaye D; Aillerie I; Aillerie S; Navarro J; Vienne F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jul; 104():88-95. PubMed ID: 28494259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.