231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31560573)
1. Eye-Tracking Metrics Predict Perceived Workload in Robotic Surgical Skills Training.
Wu C; Cha J; Sulek J; Zhou T; Sundaram CP; Wachs J; Yu D
Hum Factors; 2020 Dec; 62(8):1365-1386. PubMed ID: 31560573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensor-based indicators of performance changes between sessions during robotic surgery training.
Wu C; Cha J; Sulek J; Sundaram CP; Wachs J; Proctor RW; Yu D
Appl Ergon; 2021 Jan; 90():103251. PubMed ID: 32961465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Eye-Tracking in Physical Human-Robot Interaction: Mental Workload and Performance Prediction.
Upasani S; Srinivasan D; Zhu Q; Du J; Leonessa A
Hum Factors; 2024 Aug; 66(8):2104-2119. PubMed ID: 37793896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Virtual Reality
Cowan A; Chen J; Mingo S; Reddy SS; Ma R; Marshall S; Nguyen JH; Hung AJ
J Endourol; 2021 Oct; 35(10):1571-1576. PubMed ID: 34235970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgeons' display reduced mental effort and workload while performing robotically assisted surgical tasks, when compared to conventional laparoscopy.
Moore LJ; Wilson MR; McGrath JS; Waine E; Masters RS; Vine SJ
Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2553-60. PubMed ID: 25427414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Urology residents experience comparable workload profiles when performing live porcine nephrectomies and robotic surgery virtual reality training modules.
Mouraviev V; Klein M; Schommer E; Thiel DD; Samavedi S; Kumar A; Leveillee RJ; Thomas R; Pow-Sang JM; Su LM; Mui E; Smith R; Patel V
J Robot Surg; 2016 Mar; 10(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 26753619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Relationship Between Technical Skills, Cognitive Workload, and Errors During Robotic Surgical Exercises.
Roberts SI; Cen SY; Nguyen JH; Perez LC; Medina LG; Ma R; Marshall S; Kocielnik R; Anandkumar A; Hung AJ
J Endourol; 2022 May; 36(5):712-720. PubMed ID: 34913734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual behaviour in robotic surgery-Demonstrating the validity of the simulated environment.
Dilley J; Singh H; Pratt P; Omar I; Darzi A; Mayer E
Int J Med Robot; 2020 Apr; 16(2):e2075. PubMed ID: 31925895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physiological Metrics of Surgical Difficulty and Multi-Task Requirement during Robotic Surgery Skills.
Lim C; Barragan JA; Farrow JM; Wachs JP; Sundaram CP; Yu D
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(9):. PubMed ID: 37177557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eye tracking metrics of orthopedic surgeons with different competency levels who practice simulation-based hip arthroscopic procedures.
Cai B; Xu N; Duan S; Yi J; Bay BH; Shen F; Hu N; Zhang P; Chen J; Chen C
Heliyon; 2022 Dec; 8(12):e12335. PubMed ID: 36582732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can a virtual reality surgical simulation training provide a self-driven and mentor-free skills learning? Investigation of the practical influence of the performance metrics from the virtual reality robotic surgery simulator on the skill learning and associated cognitive workloads.
Lee GI; Lee MR
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 28634632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantifying the cognitive cost of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgeries: Gaze-based indices.
Di Stasi LL; Díaz-Piedra C; Ruiz-Rabelo JF; Rieiro H; Sanchez Carrion JM; Catena A
Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():168-174. PubMed ID: 28802436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools.
Dubin AK; Smith R; Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 28757439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gaze entropy reflects surgical task load.
Di Stasi LL; Diaz-Piedra C; Rieiro H; Sánchez Carrión JM; Martin Berrido M; Olivares G; Catena A
Surg Endosc; 2016 Nov; 30(11):5034-5043. PubMed ID: 26983440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of robotic assistance on mental workload and cognitive performance of surgical trainees performing a complex minimally invasive suturing task.
Lau E; Alkhamesi NA; Schlachta CM
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2551-2559. PubMed ID: 31482359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises.
Dulan G; Rege RV; Hogg DC; Gilberg-Fisher KM; Arain NA; Tesfay ST; Scott DJ
Surg Endosc; 2012 Jun; 26(6):1516-21. PubMed ID: 22350226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using objective robotic automated performance metrics and task-evoked pupillary response to distinguish surgeon expertise.
Nguyen JH; Chen J; Marshall SP; Ghodoussipour S; Chen A; Gill IS; Hung AJ
World J Urol; 2020 Jul; 38(7):1599-1605. PubMed ID: 31346762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons.
Choussein S; Srouji SS; Farland LV; Wietsma A; Missmer SA; Hollis M; Yu RN; Pozner CN; Gargiulo AR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28734971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Measurement of Cognitive Workload in Surgery Using Pupil Metrics: A Systematic Review and Narrative Analysis.
Naik R; Kogkas A; Ashrafian H; Mylonas G; Darzi A
J Surg Res; 2022 Dec; 280():258-272. PubMed ID: 36030601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. See Like an Expert: Gaze-Augmented Training Enhances Skill Acquisition in a Virtual Reality Robotic Suturing Task.
Melnyk R; Campbell T; Holler T; Cameron K; Saba P; Witthaus MW; Joseph J; Ghazi A
J Endourol; 2021 Mar; 35(3):376-382. PubMed ID: 32967467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]