205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31560581)
1. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: When Adoption of a Novel Treatment Precedes Prospective, Randomized Evidence.
Melamed A; Rauh-Hain JA; Ramirez PT
J Clin Oncol; 2019 Nov; 37(33):3069-3074. PubMed ID: 31560581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Changing treatment landscape for early cervical cancer: outcomes reported with minimally invasive surgery compared with an open approach.
Melamed A; Ramirez PT
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 32(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 31815768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Financial viewpoint of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: another disadvantage?
Matsuo K; Matsuzaki S; Mandelbaum RS; Klar M; Roman L
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1464. PubMed ID: 32747409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The LACC Trial: Has Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Been Dealt a Knockout Punch?
Leitao MM
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Sep; 28(7):1248-1250. PubMed ID: 30095706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Advances in laparoscopic surgery for cervical cancer.
Bogani G; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Rossetti D; Ditto A; Martinelli F; Chiappa V; Ferla S; Indini A; Sabatucci I; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2019 Nov; 143():76-80. PubMed ID: 31499276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nerve-Sparing Approach Improves Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bogani G; Rossetti DO; Ditto A; Signorelli M; Martinelli F; Mosca L; Scaffa C; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Chiappa V; Sabatucci I; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(3):402-410. PubMed ID: 29191471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer: consequences for treatment after LACC Study.
Kimmig R; Ind T
J Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jul; 29(4):e75. PubMed ID: 29770634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive surgery for radical hysterectomy in women with cervical cancer: Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Surgery position statement.
Kim M; Kong TW; Kim S; Kim SC; Kim YB; Kim JW; Park JY; Suh DH; Shim SH; Lee KH; Lee SJ; Lee JK; Lim MC
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 30(5):e104. PubMed ID: 31328466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radical Hysterectomy: Efficacy and Safety in the Dawn of Minimally Invasive Techniques.
Gil-Moreno A; Carbonell-Socias M; Salicrú S; Centeno-Mediavilla C; Franco-Camps S; Colas E; Oaknin A; Pérez-Benavente A; Díaz-Feijoo B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):492-500. PubMed ID: 29908339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term oncological outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective, single-institutional study in the wake of the LACC trial.
Kanno K; Andou M; Yanai S; Toeda M; Nimura R; Ichikawa F; Teishikata Y; Shirane T; Sakate S; Kihira T; Hamasaki Y; Sawada M; Shirane A; Ota Y
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2425-2434. PubMed ID: 31502349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical Management of Early Cervical Cancer: When Is Laparoscopic Appropriate?
Greggi S; Casella G; Scala F; Falcone F; Visconti S; Scaffa C
Curr Oncol Rep; 2020 Jan; 22(1):7. PubMed ID: 31989322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survival following minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for patients with cervical carcinoma and tumor size ≤2 cm.
Nasioudis D; Albright BB; Haggerty AF; Ko EM; Kim SH; Morgan MA; Latif NA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 224(3):317-318.e2. PubMed ID: 33129764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Vaginal Closure with EndoGIA to Prevent Tumor Spillage in Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Boyraz G; Karalok A; Basaran D; Turan T
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(4):602. PubMed ID: 30064005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early-Stage Cervical Carcinoma: Interpreting the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer Trial Results.
Tewari KS
J Clin Oncol; 2019 Nov; 37(33):3075-3080. PubMed ID: 31560582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes after minimally invasive surgery in cervical cancer.
Burki TK
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Dec; 19(12):e674. PubMed ID: 30416073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost analysis of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer performed by a single surgeon in an Italian center: an update in gynecologic oncological field.
Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Fachechi G; Pirovano C; Gaetani M; Youssef A
Updates Surg; 2017 Dec; 69(4):517-522. PubMed ID: 28508348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
