These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31561014)
1. An analysis reveals differences between pragmatic and explanatory diagnostic accuracy studies. Bossuyt PM; Olsen M; Hyde C; Cohen JF J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 117():29-35. PubMed ID: 31561014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A dynamic application of PRECIS-2 to evaluate implementation in a pragmatic, cluster randomized clinical trial in two nursing home systems. Palmer JA; Mor V; Volandes AE; McCreedy E; Loomer L; Carter P; Dvorchak F; Mitchell SL Trials; 2018 Aug; 19(1):453. PubMed ID: 30134976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Study control, violators, inclusion criteria and defining explanatory and pragmatic trials. McMahon AD Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(10):1365-76. PubMed ID: 12185890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Explanatory Versus Pragmatic Trials: An Essential Concept in Study Design and Interpretation. Merali Z; Wilson JR Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Nov; 30(9):404-406. PubMed ID: 29049130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trends in the Explanatory or Pragmatic Nature of Cardiovascular Clinical Trials Over 2 Decades. Sepehrvand N; Alemayehu W; Das D; Gupta AK; Gouda P; Ghimire A; Du AX; Hatami S; Babadagli HE; Verma S; Kashour Z; Ezekowitz JA JAMA Cardiol; 2019 Nov; 4(11):1122-1128. PubMed ID: 31473763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pragmatic vs. explanatory: an adaptation of the PRECIS tool helps to judge the applicability of systematic reviews for daily practice. Koppenaal T; Linmans J; Knottnerus JA; Spigt M J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):1095-101. PubMed ID: 21474282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Leeflang MM; Deeks JJ; Gatsonis C; Bossuyt PM; Ann Intern Med; 2008 Dec; 149(12):889-97. PubMed ID: 19075208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. Thorpe KE; Zwarenstein M; Oxman AD; Treweek S; Furberg CD; Altman DG; Tunis S; Bergel E; Harvey I; Magid DJ; Chalkidou K J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 May; 62(5):464-75. PubMed ID: 19348971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pilot and feasibility studies for pragmatic trials have unique considerations and areas of uncertainty. Chan CL; Taljaard M; Lancaster GA; Brehaut JC; Eldridge SM J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():102-114. PubMed ID: 34229091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Dinnes J; Deeks J; Kirby J; Roderick P Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(12):1-113, iii. PubMed ID: 15774235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies. Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How pragmatic is it? Lessons learned using PRECIS and RE-AIM for determining pragmatic characteristics of research. Gaglio B; Phillips SM; Heurtin-Roberts S; Sanchez MA; Glasgow RE Implement Sci; 2014 Aug; 9():96. PubMed ID: 25163664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using the Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS) model in clinical research: Application to refine a practice-based research network (PBRN) study. Elder WG; Munk N J Am Board Fam Med; 2014; 27(6):846-54. PubMed ID: 25381083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pragmatic trial design elements showed a different impact on trial interpretation and feasibility than explanatory elements. Nieuwenhuis JB; Irving E; Oude Rengerink K; Lloyd E; Goetz I; Grobbee DE; Stolk P; Groenwold RH; Zuidgeest MG; J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 77():95-100. PubMed ID: 27164273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Principles and procedures for data and safety monitoring in pragmatic clinical trials. Simon GE; Shortreed SM; Rossom RC; Penfold RB; Sperl-Hillen JAM; O'Connor P Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):690. PubMed ID: 31815644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pragmatic vs explanatory trials: the pragmascope tool to help measure differences in protocols of mental health randomized controlled trials. Tosh G; Soares-Weiser K; Adams CE Dialogues Clin Neurosci; 2011; 13(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 21842618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]