These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31561928)

  • 1. Quality, Trustworthiness, Readability, and Accuracy of Medical Information Regarding Common Pediatric Emergency Medicine-Related Complaints on the Web.
    Rothrock SG; Rothrock AN; Swetland SB; Pagane M; Isaak SA; Romney J; Chavez V; Chavez SH
    J Emerg Med; 2019 Oct; 57(4):469-477. PubMed ID: 31561928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.
    Arslan D; Tutar MS; Kozanhan B
    Eur J Pediatr; 2020 Dec; 179(12):1881-1891. PubMed ID: 32894353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality and accuracy of patient-oriented Web-based information regarding tooth avulsion.
    Nangia D; Saini A; Krishnan A; Sharma S; Kumar V; Chawla A; Logani A
    Dent Traumatol; 2022 Aug; 38(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 35225429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Readability, understandability, and quality of retinopathy of prematurity information on the web.
    Yılmaz FH; Tutar MS; Arslan D; Çeri A
    Birth Defects Res; 2021 Jul; 113(12):901-910. PubMed ID: 33594835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Risks Associated With Computed Tomography Scans: An Assessment of the Readability and Reliability of Online Text Available for Patient Information and Guidance.
    Hemaya M; Hemaya M; Habeeb A
    Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30758. PubMed ID: 36447695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
    Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
    O'Neill SC; Baker JF; Fitzgerald C; Fleming C; Rowan F; Byrne D; Synnott K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(10):E645-9. PubMed ID: 24583736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A systematic review of internet-based information on dermatomyositis and polymyositis.
    Haque A; Cox M; Sandler RD; Hughes M
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2020 Dec; 23(12):1613-1618. PubMed ID: 32812386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inflammatory bowel disease: An evaluation of health information on the internet.
    Azer SA; AlOlayan TI; AlGhamdi MA; AlSanea MA
    World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Mar; 23(9):1676-1696. PubMed ID: 28321169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Online Patient Education Materials for Orthognathic Surgery Fail to Meet Readability and Quality Standards.
    Lee KC; Berg ET; Jazayeri HE; Chuang SK; Eisig SB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 77(1):180.e1-180.e8. PubMed ID: 30296407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. All I Have Learned, I Have Learned from Google: Why Today's Facial Rejuvenation Patients are Prone to Misinformation, and the Steps We can take to Contend with Unreliable Information.
    Mehta N; Gupta A; Nissan M
    Facial Plast Surg; 2019 Aug; 35(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 31412380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An objective analysis of quality and readability of online information on COVID-19.
    Wrigley Kelly NE; Murray KE; McCarthy C; O'Shea DB
    Health Technol (Berl); 2021; 11(5):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 34189011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy and Readability of Websites on Kidney and Bladder Cancers.
    Azer SA; Alghofaili MM; Alsultan RM; Alrumaih NS
    J Cancer Educ; 2018 Aug; 33(4):926-944. PubMed ID: 28281091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cosmetic facial surgery: are online resources reliable and do patients understand them?
    Awal DH; Mills C
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 56(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 29307586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readability of online patient education materials for parents after a failed newborn hearing screen.
    Sax L; Razak A; Shetty K; Cohen M; Levi J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 125():168-174. PubMed ID: 31326734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Readability of Wikipedia Pages on Autoimmune Disorders: Systematic Quantitative Assessment.
    Watad A; Bragazzi NL; Brigo F; Sharif K; Amital H; McGonagle D; Shoenfeld Y; Adawi M
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jul; 19(7):e260. PubMed ID: 28720555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Readability of Cancer Clinical Trials Websites.
    Hillyer GC; Beauchemin M; Garcia P; Kelsen M; Brogan FL; Schwartz GK; Basch CH
    Cancer Control; 2020; 27(1):1073274819901125. PubMed ID: 31973569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the Quality, Content, and Readability of Freely Available Online Information for Patients Regarding Diabetic Retinopathy.
    Kloosterboer A; Yannuzzi NA; Patel NA; Kuriyan AE; Sridhar J
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 137(11):1240-1245. PubMed ID: 31436789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.