These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31562081)

  • 1. A Method and an Experimental Setup for Measuring the Self-Noise of Piezoelectric Hydrophones.
    Krishnakumar R; Ramesh R
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Feb; 67(2):413-421. PubMed ID: 31562081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the coherent components of low-frequency ambient noise in the Indian Ocean.
    Sabra KG; Fried S; Kuperman WA; Prior M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):EL20-5. PubMed ID: 23298013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Primary reciprocity-based method for calibration of hydrophone magnitude and phase sensitivity: complete tests at frequencies from 1 to 7 MHz.
    Oliveira EG; Costa-Felix RP; Machado JC
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Apr; 58():87-95. PubMed ID: 25578371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Development of the Differential MEMS Vector Hydrophone.
    Zhang G; Liu M; Shen N; Wang X; Zhang W
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Jun; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 28594384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comparison of Different Calibration Techniques for Hydrophones Used in Medical Ultrasonic Field Measurement.
    Weber M; Wilkens V
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2021 May; 68(5):1919-1929. PubMed ID: 33360988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface and underwater acoustic target recognition using only two hydrophones based on machine learning.
    Yu Q; Zhang W; Zhu M; Shi J; Liu Y; Liu S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Jun; 155(6):3606-3614. PubMed ID: 38833282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PVDF reference hydrophone development in the UK-from fabrication and lamination to use as secondary standards.
    Robinson S; Preston R; Smith M; Millar C
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2000; 47(6):1336-44. PubMed ID: 18238679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of two methods for phase response calibration of hydrophones in the frequency range 10-400 kHz.
    Hayman G; Wang Y; Robinson S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):750-9. PubMed ID: 23363094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A multiple-frequency hydrophone calibration technique.
    Smith RA; Bacon DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 May; 87(5):2231-43. PubMed ID: 2189922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 100 MHz bandwidth planar laser-generated ultrasound source for hydrophone calibration.
    Rajagopal S; Cox BT
    Ultrasonics; 2020 Dec; 108():106218. PubMed ID: 32721650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time delay spectrometry for hydrophone calibrations below 1 MHz.
    Gammell PM; Harris GR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):L41-6. PubMed ID: 10573913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variability of the coherent arrivals extracted from low-frequency deep-ocean ambient noise correlations.
    Woolfe KF; Sabra KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):521-32. PubMed ID: 26328669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sources and levels of ambient ocean sound near the Antarctic Peninsula.
    Dziak RP; Bohnenstiehl DR; Stafford KM; Matsumoto H; Park M; Lee WS; Fowler MJ; Lau TK; Haxel JH; Mellinger DK
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0123425. PubMed ID: 25875205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Calibration of miniature medical ultrasonic hydrophones for frequencies in the range 100 to 500 kHz using an ultrasonically absorbing waveguide.
    Rajagopal S; Zeqiri B; Gélat PN
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 May; 61(5):765-78. PubMed ID: 24803021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Voltage sensitivity response of ultrasonic hydrophones in the frequency range 0.25-2.5 MHz.
    Lewin PA; Bautista R; Devaraju V
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Sep; 25(7):1131-7. PubMed ID: 10574344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of a polymer film optical fiber hydrophone for use in the range 1 to 20 MHz: a comparison with PVDF needle and membrane hydrophones.
    Beard PC; Hurrell AM; Mills TN
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2000; 47(1):256-64. PubMed ID: 18238538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling of anomalies due to hydrophones in continuous-wave ultrasound fields.
    Huttunen T; Kaipio JP; Hynynen K
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2003 Nov; 50(11):1486-500. PubMed ID: 14682632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calibration of ultrasonic hydrophone probes up to 100 MHz using time gating frequency analysis and finite amplitude waves.
    Radulescu EG; Lewin PA; Wójcik J; Nowicki A
    Ultrasonics; 2003 Jun; 41(4):247-54. PubMed ID: 12782255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the spatial properties of ambient noise in the Tonga Trench, including effects of bathymetric shadowing.
    Barclay DR; Buckingham MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Nov; 136(5):2497-511. PubMed ID: 25373952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design and Implementation of a Four-Unit Array Piezoelectric Bionic MEMS Vector Hydrophone.
    Shi S; Zhang X; Wang Z; Ma L; Kang K; Pang Y; Ma H; Hu J
    Micromachines (Basel); 2024 Apr; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 38675335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.