These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31562416)

  • 1. What is the survival rate of dental implants placed at sites of failed implants?
    Nassani MZ
    Evid Based Dent; 2019 Sep; 20(3):95-96. PubMed ID: 31562416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survival of dental implants at sites after implant failure: A systematic review.
    Oh SL; Shiau HJ; Reynolds MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 31027959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.
    Wallace SS; Froum SJ
    Ann Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 8(1):328-43. PubMed ID: 14971260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants.
    Esposito M; Ardebili Y; Worthington HV
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jul; (7):CD003815. PubMed ID: 25048469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feasibility of Dental Implant Replacement in Failed Sites: A Systematic Review.
    Zhou W; Wang F; Monje A; Elnayef B; Huang W; Wu Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):535-45. PubMed ID: 27183062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A long-term retrospective analysis of survival rates of implants in the mandible.
    Balshi TJ; Wolfinger GJ; Stein BE; Balshi SF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1348-54. PubMed ID: 26574859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of implant diameter on long-term survival of dental implants placed in posterior maxilla: a systematic review.
    Javed F; Romanos GE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jan; 19(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 25366871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A retrospective study of the survival of smooth- and rough-surface dental implants.
    Balshe AA; Assad DA; Eckert SE; Koka S; Weaver AL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1113-8. PubMed ID: 20162117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the survival rate of implants placed in previously failed sites.
    Gomes GH; Misawa MYO; Fernandes C; Pannuti CM; Saraiva L; Huynh-Ba G; Villar CC
    Braz Oral Res; 2018; 32():e27. PubMed ID: 29723338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survival of short implants is improved with greater implant length, placement in the mandible compared with the maxilla, and in nonsmokers.
    Carr AB
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(3 Suppl):189-91. PubMed ID: 23253845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immediate loading vs. early/conventional loading of immediately placed implants in partially edentulous patients from the patients' perspective: A systematic review.
    Huynh-Ba G; Oates TW; Williams MAH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():255-269. PubMed ID: 30328205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 3-arm study of early loading of rough-surfaced implants in the completely edentulous maxilla and in the edentulous posterior maxilla and mandible: results after 1 year of loading.
    Nordin T; Nilsson R; Frykholm A; Hallman M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):880-6. PubMed ID: 15623065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate, immediate-delayed and delayed implants).
    Esposito M; Grusovin MG; Polyzos IP; Felice P; Worthington HV
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Sep; (9):CD005968. PubMed ID: 20824846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survival of Dental Implants Replacing Previously Failed Implants: A Retrospective Study in a University Setting.
    Nguyen R; Soldatos N; Tran D; Stylianou P; Angelov N; Weltman R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1312-1319. PubMed ID: 30427962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of implant length on the survival of rough-surface dental implants.
    Kotsovilis S; Fourmousis I; Karoussis IK; Bamia C
    J Periodontol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1700-18. PubMed ID: 19905941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The all-on-four concept may be a viable treatment option for edentulous rehabilitation.
    Afrashtehfar KI
    Evid Based Dent; 2016 Jun; 17(2):56-7. PubMed ID: 27339242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In selected sites, short, rough-surfaced dental implants are as successful as long dental implants: a critical summary of Pommer B, Frantal S, Willer J, Posch M, Watzek G, Tepper G. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38(9):856-863.
    Balevi B
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Feb; 144(2):195-6. PubMed ID: 23372136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is osteoporosis a risk factor for implant survival or failure?
    Grisa A; Veitz-Keenan A
    Evid Based Dent; 2018 Jun; 19(2):51-52. PubMed ID: 29930358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic review of survival rates for immediately loaded dental implants.
    Del Fabbro M; Testori T; Francetti L; Taschieri S; Weinstein R
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Jun; 26(3):249-63. PubMed ID: 16836167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta-analysis.
    Srinivasan M; Vazquez L; Rieder P; Moraguez O; Bernard JP; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):539-45. PubMed ID: 23413956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.