These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Ultrasound image properties influenced by abdominal wall thickness and composition. Haberkorn U; Layer G; Rudat V; Zuna I; Lorenz A; van Kaick G J Clin Ultrasound; 1993 Sep; 21(7):423-9. PubMed ID: 8370802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Induced transducer orientation during ultrasound imaging: effects on abdominal muscle thickness and bladder position. Whittaker JL; Warner MB; Stokes MJ Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1803-11. PubMed ID: 19699027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contribution of mesenteric fat to unsatisfactory abdominal and pelvic ultrasonography. Bree RL; Schwab RE Radiology; 1981 Sep; 140(3):773-6. PubMed ID: 7280248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Panorama ultrasonography of the abdominal wall for delineation of the anatomy and diagnosis of pathological findings]. Krombach GA; Truong S; Staatz G; Mahnken A; Prescher A; Tacke J; Weidner J; Günther RW Rofo; 2001 Aug; 173(8):714-9. PubMed ID: 11570241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Definition of anatomical planes for use in transvaginal sonography. Dodson MG; Deter RL J Clin Ultrasound; 1990 May; 18(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 2160990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sectional anatomy of the pelvis in the male rat with ultrasound correlations. Suzuki T; Takezawa Y; Tamura Y; Mashimo T; Imai K; Yamanaka H; Suzuki K Anat Rec; 1991 Oct; 231(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 1746726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Influence of abdominal wall composition and thickness on ultrasound B scan]. Haberkorn U; Rudat V; Layer G; Zuna I; Lorenz A; van Kaick G Rofo; 1991 Oct; 155(4):327-31. PubMed ID: 1834247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Emergent ultrasound evaluation of the pediatric female pelvis. Back SJ; Maya CL; Zewdneh D; Epelman M Pediatr Radiol; 2017 Aug; 47(9):1134-1143. PubMed ID: 28779190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transrectal ultrasonography of the caudal portion of abdominal and pelvic cavities in horses. Schmidt AR J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1989 Feb; 194(3):365-71. PubMed ID: 2645257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility of the fetal anatomic and maternal pelvic survey by magnetic resonance imaging at term. Zaretsky MV; McIntire DD; Twickler DM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Oct; 189(4):997-1001. PubMed ID: 14586343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-dimensional sectioned images and three-dimensional surface models for learning the anatomy of the female pelvis. Shin DS; Jang HG; Hwang SB; Har DH; Moon YL; Chung MS Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(5):316-23. PubMed ID: 23463707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Verification of an optimized stimulation point on the abdominal wall for transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation for activation of deep lumbar stabilizing muscles. Baek SO; Cho HK; Jung GS; Son SM; Cho YW; Ahn SH Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2178-83. PubMed ID: 24534392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between ultrasonography and electromyography measurement of abdominal muscles when activated with and without pelvis floor muscles contraction. Tahan N; Arab AM; Arzani P; Rahimi F Minerva Med; 2013 Dec; 104(6):625-30. PubMed ID: 24316915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance-based female pelvic anatomy as relevant for maternal childbirth injury simulations. Hoyte L; Damaser MS Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Apr; 1101():361-76. PubMed ID: 17363445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]