These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31562581)
1. Influence of fat deposition on T1 mapping of the pancreas: evaluation by dual-flip-angle MR imaging with and without fat suppression. Higashi M; Tanabe M; Okada M; Furukawa M; Iida E; Ito K Radiol Med; 2020 Jan; 125(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 31562581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantification of pancreatic fat with dual-echo imaging at 3.0-T MR in clinical application: how do the corrections for T1 and T2* relaxation effect work and simplified correction strategy. Yuan F; Song B; Huang Z; Xia C; Liu X Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 29260576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breath-hold MR measurements of fat fraction, T1 , and T2 * of water and fat in vertebral bone marrow. Le Ster C; Gambarota G; Lasbleiz J; Guillin R; Decaux O; Saint-Jalmes H J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Sep; 44(3):549-55. PubMed ID: 26918280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of fatty pancreas by proton density fat fraction using 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and its association with pancreatic cancer. Fukui H; Hori M; Fukuda Y; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Ota T; Ogawa K; Ninomiya K; Tatsumi M; Osuga K; Yamada D; Eguchi H; Miyoshi E; Tomiyama N Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():25-31. PubMed ID: 31439250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Feasibility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Quantification of Liver, Pancreas, Spleen, Vertebral Bone Marrow, and Renal Cortex R2* and Proton Density Fat Fraction in Transfusion-Related Iron Overload. İdilman İS; Gümrük F; Haliloğlu M; Karçaaltıncaba M Turk J Haematol; 2016 Mar; 33(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 26376710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. T Tirkes T; Lin C; Fogel EL; Sherman SS; Wang Q; Sandrasegaran K J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Apr; 45(4):1171-1176. PubMed ID: 27519287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization and evaluation of reference region variable flip angle (RR-VFA) B1+ and T Rangwala NA; Dregely I; Wu HH; Sung K J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Mar; 45(3):751-760. PubMed ID: 27532669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Confounding factors in multi-parametric q-MRI protocol: A study of bone marrow biomarkers at 1.5 T. Marage L; Gambarota G; Lasbleiz J; Lederlin M; Saint-Jalmes H Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Dec; 74():96-104. PubMed ID: 32858181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preoperative Evaluation of Pancreatic Fibrosis and Lipomatosis: Correlation of Magnetic Resonance Findings With Histology Using Magnetization Transfer Imaging and Multigradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Schawkat K; Eshmuminov D; Lenggenhager D; Endhardt K; Vrugt B; Boss A; Petrowsky H; Clavien PA; Reiner CS Invest Radiol; 2018 Dec; 53(12):720-727. PubMed ID: 30247172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone marrow fat content in 70 adolescent girls with anorexia nervosa: Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy assessment. Ecklund K; Vajapeyam S; Mulkern RV; Feldman HA; O'Donnell JM; DiVasta AD; Gordon CM Pediatr Radiol; 2017 Jul; 47(8):952-962. PubMed ID: 28432403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A fast method for the quantification of fat fraction and relaxation times: Comparison of five sites of bone marrow. Le Ster C; Lasbleiz J; Kannengiesser S; Guillin R; Gambarota G; Saint-Jalmes H Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jun; 39():157-161. PubMed ID: 28263827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved T1, contrast concentration, and pharmacokinetic parameter quantification in the presence of fat with two-point Dixon for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Le Y; Dale B; Akisik F; Koons K; Lin C Magn Reson Med; 2016 Apr; 75(4):1677-84. PubMed ID: 25988338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fat fraction bias correction using T1 estimates and flip angle mapping. Yang IY; Cui Y; Wiens CN; Wade TP; Friesen-Waldner LJ; McKenzie CA J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jan; 39(1):217-23. PubMed ID: 23559467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pancreatic MRI associated with pancreatic fibrosis and postoperative fistula: comparison between pancreatic cancer and non-pancreatic cancer tissue. Noda Y; Goshima S; Suzui N; Miyazaki T; Kajita K; Kawada H; Kawai N; Tanahashi Y; Matsuo M Clin Radiol; 2019 Jun; 74(6):490.e1-490.e6. PubMed ID: 30914207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of pancreatic fat content measured by different methods employing MR mDixon sequence. Li X; Yang Q; Ye H; Li S; Wang Y; Yu W PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0260001. PubMed ID: 34807927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver and pancreas. Wang C Acta Radiol Suppl; 1998; 415():1-31. PubMed ID: 9571956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Small pancreatic adenocarcinomas: efficacy of MR imaging with fat suppression and gadolinium enhancement. Gabata T; Matsui O; Kadoya M; Yoshikawa J; Miyayama S; Takashima T; Nagakawa T; Kayahara M; Nonomura A Radiology; 1994 Dec; 193(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 7972808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results. de Bazelaire CM; Duhamel GD; Rofsky NM; Alsop DC Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):652-9. PubMed ID: 14990831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. T1 mapping for the diagnosis of early chronic pancreatitis: correlation with Cambridge classification system. Cheng M; Gromski MA; Fogel EL; DeWitt JM; Patel AA; Tirkes T Br J Radiol; 2021 May; 94(1121):20200685. PubMed ID: 33861154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]