189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31562581)
1. Influence of fat deposition on T1 mapping of the pancreas: evaluation by dual-flip-angle MR imaging with and without fat suppression.
Higashi M; Tanabe M; Okada M; Furukawa M; Iida E; Ito K
Radiol Med; 2020 Jan; 125(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 31562581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantification of pancreatic fat with dual-echo imaging at 3.0-T MR in clinical application: how do the corrections for T1 and T2* relaxation effect work and simplified correction strategy.
Yuan F; Song B; Huang Z; Xia C; Liu X
Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 29260576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breath-hold MR measurements of fat fraction, T1 , and T2 * of water and fat in vertebral bone marrow.
Le Ster C; Gambarota G; Lasbleiz J; Guillin R; Decaux O; Saint-Jalmes H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Sep; 44(3):549-55. PubMed ID: 26918280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of fatty pancreas by proton density fat fraction using 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and its association with pancreatic cancer.
Fukui H; Hori M; Fukuda Y; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Ota T; Ogawa K; Ninomiya K; Tatsumi M; Osuga K; Yamada D; Eguchi H; Miyoshi E; Tomiyama N
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():25-31. PubMed ID: 31439250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Feasibility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Quantification of Liver, Pancreas, Spleen, Vertebral Bone Marrow, and Renal Cortex R2* and Proton Density Fat Fraction in Transfusion-Related Iron Overload.
İdilman İS; Gümrük F; Haliloğlu M; Karçaaltıncaba M
Turk J Haematol; 2016 Mar; 33(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 26376710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. T
Tirkes T; Lin C; Fogel EL; Sherman SS; Wang Q; Sandrasegaran K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Apr; 45(4):1171-1176. PubMed ID: 27519287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved technique for pancreatic MRI: value of oblique fat suppression imaging with oral barium administration.
Helmberger T; Mergo PJ; Stoupis C; Torres GM; Burton SS; Ros PR
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 9606379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization and evaluation of reference region variable flip angle (RR-VFA) B1+ and T
Rangwala NA; Dregely I; Wu HH; Sung K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Mar; 45(3):751-760. PubMed ID: 27532669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Confounding factors in multi-parametric q-MRI protocol: A study of bone marrow biomarkers at 1.5 T.
Marage L; Gambarota G; Lasbleiz J; Lederlin M; Saint-Jalmes H
Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Dec; 74():96-104. PubMed ID: 32858181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preoperative Evaluation of Pancreatic Fibrosis and Lipomatosis: Correlation of Magnetic Resonance Findings With Histology Using Magnetization Transfer Imaging and Multigradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Schawkat K; Eshmuminov D; Lenggenhager D; Endhardt K; Vrugt B; Boss A; Petrowsky H; Clavien PA; Reiner CS
Invest Radiol; 2018 Dec; 53(12):720-727. PubMed ID: 30247172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone marrow fat content in 70 adolescent girls with anorexia nervosa: Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy assessment.
Ecklund K; Vajapeyam S; Mulkern RV; Feldman HA; O'Donnell JM; DiVasta AD; Gordon CM
Pediatr Radiol; 2017 Jul; 47(8):952-962. PubMed ID: 28432403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A fast method for the quantification of fat fraction and relaxation times: Comparison of five sites of bone marrow.
Le Ster C; Lasbleiz J; Kannengiesser S; Guillin R; Gambarota G; Saint-Jalmes H
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jun; 39():157-161. PubMed ID: 28263827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved T1, contrast concentration, and pharmacokinetic parameter quantification in the presence of fat with two-point Dixon for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Le Y; Dale B; Akisik F; Koons K; Lin C
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Apr; 75(4):1677-84. PubMed ID: 25988338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fat fraction bias correction using T1 estimates and flip angle mapping.
Yang IY; Cui Y; Wiens CN; Wade TP; Friesen-Waldner LJ; McKenzie CA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jan; 39(1):217-23. PubMed ID: 23559467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pancreatic MRI associated with pancreatic fibrosis and postoperative fistula: comparison between pancreatic cancer and non-pancreatic cancer tissue.
Noda Y; Goshima S; Suzui N; Miyazaki T; Kajita K; Kawada H; Kawai N; Tanahashi Y; Matsuo M
Clin Radiol; 2019 Jun; 74(6):490.e1-490.e6. PubMed ID: 30914207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of pancreatic fat content measured by different methods employing MR mDixon sequence.
Li X; Yang Q; Ye H; Li S; Wang Y; Yu W
PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0260001. PubMed ID: 34807927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver and pancreas.
Wang C
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1998; 415():1-31. PubMed ID: 9571956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Small pancreatic adenocarcinomas: efficacy of MR imaging with fat suppression and gadolinium enhancement.
Gabata T; Matsui O; Kadoya M; Yoshikawa J; Miyayama S; Takashima T; Nagakawa T; Kayahara M; Nonomura A
Radiology; 1994 Dec; 193(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 7972808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results.
de Bazelaire CM; Duhamel GD; Rofsky NM; Alsop DC
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):652-9. PubMed ID: 14990831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. T1 mapping for the diagnosis of early chronic pancreatitis: correlation with Cambridge classification system.
Cheng M; Gromski MA; Fogel EL; DeWitt JM; Patel AA; Tirkes T
Br J Radiol; 2021 May; 94(1121):20200685. PubMed ID: 33861154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
