These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

596 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31563194)

  • 1. Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Surgery.
    Panchal N; Mahmood L; Retana A; Emery R
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2019 Nov; 31(4):539-547. PubMed ID: 31563194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement-Model-Based Evaluation.
    Emery RW; Merritt SA; Lank K; Gibbs JD
    J Oral Implantol; 2016 Oct; 42(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 27267658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Different techniques of static/dynamic guided implant surgery: modalities and indications.
    Vercruyssen M; Fortin T; Widmann G; Jacobs R; Quirynen M
    Periodontol 2000; 2014 Oct; 66(1):214-27. PubMed ID: 25123770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice.
    Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-Aided Planning and Placement in Implant Surgery.
    Deeb GR; Tran DQ; Deeb JG
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2020 Sep; 28(2):53-58. PubMed ID: 32741514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel mixed reality-guided dental implant placement navigation system based on virtual-actual registration.
    Fan X; Tao B; Tu P; Shen Y; Wu Y; Chen X
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Nov; 166():107560. PubMed ID: 37847946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic Navigation for Surgical Implant Placement: Overview of Technology, Key Concepts, and a Case Report.
    Mandelaris GA; Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2018 Oct; 39(9):614-621; quiz 622. PubMed ID: 30299111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guided Implant Surgery: A Technique Whose Time Has Come.
    Chen P; Nikoyan L
    Dent Clin North Am; 2021 Jan; 65(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 33213716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems in the placement of zygomatic dental implants.
    González Rueda JR; Galparsoro Catalán A; de Paz Hermoso VM; Riad Deglow E; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Pato Mourelo J; Montero Martín J; Hernández Montero S
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):150. PubMed ID: 36918837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement-Choosing the Method of Guidance.
    Block MS; Emery RW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 74(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 26452429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology.
    van der Zel JM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 18482361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery.
    D'haese J; Ackhurst J; Wismeijer D; De Bruyn H; Tahmaseb A
    Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):121-133. PubMed ID: 28000275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The smiling scan technique: Facially driven guided surgery and prosthetics.
    Pozzi A; Arcuri L; Moy PK
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Oct; 62(4):514-517. PubMed ID: 29655527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Virtual 3-dimensional representation of a completely edentulous patient for computer-aided static implant planning.
    Pérez-Giugovaz MG; Sadeghpour M; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):384-390. PubMed ID: 34315612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The accuracy of static vs. dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: A randomized controlled trial.
    Kaewsiri D; Panmekiate S; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jun; 30(6):505-514. PubMed ID: 31060099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement.
    Jacobs R; Quirynen M
    Periodontol 2000; 2014 Oct; 66(1):203-13. PubMed ID: 25123769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A classification of surgical guides application for dental implantation].
    Sedov YG; Avanesov AM; Saleev RA; Saleeva GT; Yarulina ZI
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2021; 100(1):84-88. PubMed ID: 33528962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of dental implant placement using augmented reality-based navigation, static computer assisted implant surgery, and the free-hand method: An in vitro study.
    Kivovics M; Takács A; Pénzes D; Németh O; Mijiritsky E
    J Dent; 2022 Apr; 119():104070. PubMed ID: 35183695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The combination of digital surface scanners and cone beam computed tomography technology for guided implant surgery using 3Shape implant studio software: a case history report.
    Lanis A; Álvarez Del Canto O
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 25822304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A review of virtual planning software for guided implant surgery - data import and visualization, drill guide design and manufacturing.
    Kernen F; Kramer J; Wanner L; Wismeijer D; Nelson K; Flügge T
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Sep; 20(1):251. PubMed ID: 32912273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.