These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31563259)

  • 1. On the Optimization of Bayesian D-Efficient Discrete Choice Experiment Designs for the Estimation of QALY Tariffs That Are Corrected for Nonlinear Time Preferences.
    Jonker MF; Bliemer MCJ
    Value Health; 2019 Oct; 22(10):1162-1169. PubMed ID: 31563259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advocating a Paradigm Shift in Health-State Valuations: The Estimation of Time-Preference Corrected QALY Tariffs.
    Jonker MF; Donkers B; de Bekker-Grob EW; Stolk EA
    Value Health; 2018 Aug; 21(8):993-1001. PubMed ID: 30098678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Severity-Stratified Discrete Choice Experiment Designs for Health State Evaluations.
    Lim S; Jonker MF; Oppe M; Donkers B; Stolk E
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1377-1389. PubMed ID: 30030818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Not all respondents use a multiplicative utility function in choice experiments for health state valuations, which should be reflected in the elicitation format (or statistical analysis).
    Jonker MF; Norman R
    Health Econ; 2022 Feb; 31(2):431-439. PubMed ID: 34841637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. German tariffs for the ICECAP-Supportive Care Measure (ICECAP-SCM) for use in economic evaluations at the end of life.
    Dams J; Huynh E; Riedel-Heller S; Löbner M; Brettschneider C; König HH
    Eur J Health Econ; 2021 Apr; 22(3):365-380. PubMed ID: 33475868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A framework for estimating health state utility values within a discrete choice experiment: modeling risky choices.
    Robinson A; Spencer A; Moffatt P
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Apr; 35(3):341-50. PubMed ID: 25349189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of methods for converting DCE values onto the full health-dead QALY scale.
    Rowen D; Brazier J; Van Hout B
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Apr; 35(3):328-40. PubMed ID: 25398621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating a Preference-Based Value Set for the Mental Health Quality of Life Questionnaire (MHQoL).
    van Krugten FCW; Jonker MF; Himmler SFW; Hakkaart-van Roijen L; Brouwer WBF
    Med Decis Making; 2024 Jan; 44(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 37981788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eliciting Societal Preferences for Weighting QALYs for Burden of Illness and End of Life.
    Rowen D; Brazier J; Mukuria C; Keetharuth A; Risa Hole A; Tsuchiya A; Whyte S; Shackley P
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Feb; 36(2):210-22. PubMed ID: 26670663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
    Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mimicking Real-Life Decision Making in Health: Allowing Respondents Time to Think in a Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Veldwijk J; Johansson JV; Donkers B; de Bekker-Grob EW
    Value Health; 2020 Jul; 23(7):945-952. PubMed ID: 32762997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Valuing SF-6D Health States Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Norman R; Viney R; Brazier J; Burgess L; Cronin P; King M; Ratcliffe J; Street D
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Aug; 34(6):773-86. PubMed ID: 24025661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.
    Ferreira PL; Antunes P; Ferreira LN; Pereira LN; Ramos-Goñi JM
    Qual Life Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3163-3175. PubMed ID: 31201730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are Efficient Designs Used in Discrete Choice Experiments Too Difficult for Some Respondents? A Case Study Eliciting Preferences for End-of-Life Care.
    Flynn TN; Bilger M; Malhotra C; Finkelstein EA
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2016 Mar; 34(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 26589411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A pilot discrete choice experiment to explore preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states.
    Norman R; Cronin P; Viney R
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Jun; 11(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 23649892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward Explicit Prioritization for the Caribbean: An EQ-5D Value Set for Trinidad and Tobago.
    Bailey H; Stolk E; Kind P
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2016 Dec; 11():60-67. PubMed ID: 27986200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating an anchored utility tariff for the well-being of older people measure (WOOP) for the Netherlands.
    Himmler S; Jonker M; van Krugten F; Hackert M; van Exel J; Brouwer W
    Soc Sci Med; 2022 May; 301():114901. PubMed ID: 35325838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Societal Preferences for Interventions with the Same Efficiency: Assessment and Application to Decision Making.
    Shiroiwa T; Saito S; Shimozuma K; Kodama S; Noto S; Fukuda T
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Jun; 14(3):375-85. PubMed ID: 26940671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulation study to determine the impact of different design features on design efficiency in discrete choice experiments.
    Vanniyasingam T; Cunningham CE; Foster G; Thabane L
    BMJ Open; 2016 Jul; 6(7):e011985. PubMed ID: 27436671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discrete Choice Experiments in Health State Valuation: A Systematic Review of Progress and New Trends.
    Wang H; Rowen DL; Brazier JE; Jiang L
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2023 May; 21(3):405-418. PubMed ID: 36997744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.