334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31563536)
1. Robot-assisted Vs Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for High-stage Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-center Study.
Illiano E; Ditonno P; Giannitsas K; De Rienzo G; Bini V; Costantini E
Urology; 2019 Dec; 134():116-123. PubMed ID: 31563536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Costantini E; Mearini L; Lazzeri M; Bini V; Nunzi E; di Biase M; Porena M
J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 26780167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
Pan K; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang Y; Xu H
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 26797199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot-Assisted Sacrocolporectopexy for Multicompartment Prolapse of the Pelvic Floor: A Prospective Cohort Study Evaluating Functional and Sexual Outcome.
van Iersel JJ; de Witte CJ; Verheijen PM; Broeders IA; Lenters E; Consten EC; Schraffordt Koops SE
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Oct; 59(10):968-74. PubMed ID: 27602928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.
Mueller ER; Kenton K; Anger JT; Bresee C; Tarnay C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Using Lightweight Y-Mesh.
Culligan PJ; Lewis C; Priestley J; Mushonga N
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Mar; 26(3):202-206. PubMed ID: 31688526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. One-year functional and anatomic outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal extraperitoneal colpopexy with mesh.
Jambusaria LH; Murphy M; Lucente VR
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 25185594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Postoperative complications and unanticipated healthcare encounters following mini-laparotomy vs. laparoscopic/robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparative retrospective study.
Chill HH; Hadizadeh A; Paya-Ten C; Leffelman A; Chang C; Moss NP; Goldberg RP
BMC Womens Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):173. PubMed ID: 38481283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tension-free vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: Analysis of perioperative outcomes using a Japanese national inpatient database.
Obinata D; Sugihara T; Yasunaga H; Mochida J; Yamaguchi K; Murata Y; Yoshizawa T; Matsui T; Matsui H; Sasabuchi Y; Fujimura T; Homma Y; Takahashi S
Int J Urol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):655-659. PubMed ID: 29729035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Chang CL; Chen CH; Chang SJ
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 33760992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D
Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robot-assisted surgery for the management of apical prolapse: a bi-centre prospective cohort study.
van Zanten F; Schraffordt Koops SE; O'Sullivan OE; Lenters E; Broeders I; O'Reilly BA
BJOG; 2019 Jul; 126(8):1065-1073. PubMed ID: 30924606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse using robot assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy: quality of life and technique.
Mourik SL; Martens JE; Aktas M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 22897838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of functional outcomes with purely laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in obese women.
Joubert M; Thubert T; Lefranc JP; Vaessen C; Chartier-Kastler É; Deffieux X; Rouprêt M
Prog Urol; 2014 Dec; 24(17):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25450756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mesh Exposure After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pelvic Floor Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.
van Zanten F; van Iersel JJ; Hartog FE; Aalders KIM; Lenters E; Broeders IAMJ; Schraffordt Koops SE
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(4):636-642. PubMed ID: 29964179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Compared with Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.
Yang Y; Li Z; Si K; Dai Q; Qiao Y; Li D; Zhang L; Wu F; He J; Wu G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 30(10):833-840.e2. PubMed ID: 37369345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
