These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31563536)

  • 1. Robot-assisted Vs Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for High-stage Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-center Study.
    Illiano E; Ditonno P; Giannitsas K; De Rienzo G; Bini V; Costantini E
    Urology; 2019 Dec; 134():116-123. PubMed ID: 31563536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
    Costantini E; Mearini L; Lazzeri M; Bini V; Nunzi E; di Biase M; Porena M
    J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 26780167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Pan K; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang Y; Xu H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 26797199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robot-Assisted Sacrocolporectopexy for Multicompartment Prolapse of the Pelvic Floor: A Prospective Cohort Study Evaluating Functional and Sexual Outcome.
    van Iersel JJ; de Witte CJ; Verheijen PM; Broeders IA; Lenters E; Consten EC; Schraffordt Koops SE
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Oct; 59(10):968-74. PubMed ID: 27602928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.
    Mueller ER; Kenton K; Anger JT; Bresee C; Tarnay C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Using Lightweight Y-Mesh.
    Culligan PJ; Lewis C; Priestley J; Mushonga N
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Mar; 26(3):202-206. PubMed ID: 31688526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One-year functional and anatomic outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal extraperitoneal colpopexy with mesh.
    Jambusaria LH; Murphy M; Lucente VR
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 25185594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Postoperative complications and unanticipated healthcare encounters following mini-laparotomy vs. laparoscopic/robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparative retrospective study.
    Chill HH; Hadizadeh A; Paya-Ten C; Leffelman A; Chang C; Moss NP; Goldberg RP
    BMC Womens Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):173. PubMed ID: 38481283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tension-free vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: Analysis of perioperative outcomes using a Japanese national inpatient database.
    Obinata D; Sugihara T; Yasunaga H; Mochida J; Yamaguchi K; Murata Y; Yoshizawa T; Matsui T; Matsui H; Sasabuchi Y; Fujimura T; Homma Y; Takahashi S
    Int J Urol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):655-659. PubMed ID: 29729035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Chang CL; Chen CH; Chang SJ
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 33760992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robot-assisted surgery for the management of apical prolapse: a bi-centre prospective cohort study.
    van Zanten F; Schraffordt Koops SE; O'Sullivan OE; Lenters E; Broeders I; O'Reilly BA
    BJOG; 2019 Jul; 126(8):1065-1073. PubMed ID: 30924606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse using robot assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy: quality of life and technique.
    Mourik SL; Martens JE; Aktas M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 22897838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
    Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
    Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of functional outcomes with purely laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in obese women.
    Joubert M; Thubert T; Lefranc JP; Vaessen C; Chartier-Kastler É; Deffieux X; Rouprêt M
    Prog Urol; 2014 Dec; 24(17):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25450756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mesh Exposure After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pelvic Floor Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    van Zanten F; van Iersel JJ; Hartog FE; Aalders KIM; Lenters E; Broeders IAMJ; Schraffordt Koops SE
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(4):636-642. PubMed ID: 29964179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Compared with Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.
    Yang Y; Li Z; Si K; Dai Q; Qiao Y; Li D; Zhang L; Wu F; He J; Wu G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 30(10):833-840.e2. PubMed ID: 37369345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.