These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31563710)

  • 1. Compatibility between response position and either object typical size or semantic category: SNARC- and MARC-like effects in primary school children.
    Uccula A; Enna M; Treccani B
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Jan; 189():104682. PubMed ID: 31563710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
    Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial coding of object typical size: evidence for a SNARC-like effect.
    Sellaro R; Treccani B; Job R; Cubelli R
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):950-62. PubMed ID: 25476998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Grammatical number elicits SNARC and MARC effects as a function of task demands.
    Roettger TB; Domahs F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1231-48. PubMed ID: 25384199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does Perceptual Simulation Explain Spatial Effects in Word Categorization?
    Treccani B; Mulatti C; Sulpizio S; Job R
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1102. PubMed ID: 31156515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reveals a dissociation between SNARC and MARC effects: Implication for the polarity correspondence account.
    Di Rosa E; Bardi L; Umiltà C; Masina F; Forgione M; Mapelli D
    Cortex; 2017 Aug; 93():68-78. PubMed ID: 28623718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
    Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial-numerical associations of manual response codes are strongly asymmetrical.
    Richter M; Wühr P
    Cognition; 2023 Sep; 238():105538. PubMed ID: 37413698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SNARC meets SPARC in fMRI--Interdependence of compatibility effects depends on semantic content.
    Weis T; Estner B; Krick CM; Reith W; Lachmann T
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Oct; 77():331-8. PubMed ID: 26382748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid communication The mental number line dominates alternative, explicit coding of number magnitude.
    Dollman J; Levine WH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):403-9. PubMed ID: 26445276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beyond fixed sets: boundary conditions for obtaining SNARC-like effects with continuous semantic magnitudes.
    Leth-Steensen C; Moshirian Farahi SMM; Al-Juboori N
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jul; 88(5):1575-1589. PubMed ID: 38769219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When is an odd number not odd? Influence of task rule on the MARC effect for numeric classification.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):832-42. PubMed ID: 17723063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Embodied markedness of parity? Examining handedness effects on parity judgments.
    Huber S; Klein E; Graf M; Nuerk HC; Moeller K; Willmes K
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):963-77. PubMed ID: 25394996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The SNARC and MARC effects measured online: Large-scale assessment methods in flexible cognitive effects.
    Cipora K; Soltanlou M; Reips UD; Nuerk HC
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Aug; 51(4):1676-1692. PubMed ID: 30805864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; Doricchi F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102887. PubMed ID: 31351325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The SNARC effect is not a unitary phenomenon.
    Basso Moro S; Dell'Acqua R; Cutini S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):688-695. PubMed ID: 29264847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of semantic processing and response latency on the SNARC effect.
    Didino D; Breil C; Knops A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 May; 196():75-86. PubMed ID: 31004938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reconstructing the origins of the space-number association: spatial and number-magnitude codes must be used jointly to elicit spatially organised mental number lines.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Marson F; Lasaponara S; Doricchi F
    Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():143-156. PubMed ID: 31079015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of horizontal and vertical Luminance SNARC compatibility on affective judgments.
    Gusmão B; Löffler CS; Topolinski S
    Cogn Emot; 2022 Dec; 36(8):1522-1530. PubMed ID: 36263873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.