These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31564047)
21. Topographic and biomechanical evaluation of cornea in patients with ichthyosis vulgaris. Kara N; Yildirim Y; Demircan A; Cankaya I; Kutlubay Z; Engin B; Serdaroglu S Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2012 Oct; 35(5):208-12. PubMed ID: 22677890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Intraocular pressure, corneal thickness, and corneal hysteresis in Steinert's myotonic dystrophy. Garcia Filho CA; Prata TS; Sousa AK; Doi LM; Melo LA Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2011; 74(3):161-2. PubMed ID: 21915439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Corneal biomechanical properties of patients with acromegaly. Ozkok A; Hatipoglu E; Tamcelik N; Balta B; Gundogdu AS; Ozdamar MA; Kadioglu P Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 98(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 24489375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis. Matsuura M; Murata H; Fujino Y; Yanagisawa M; Nakao Y; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 104(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 31362932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Investigation of corneal biomechanics at moderate to high refractive errors. İnceoğlu N; Emre S; Ulusoy MO Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 38(3):1061-1067. PubMed ID: 28540493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes. Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure assessment after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, long term results. Abd Elaziz MS; Elsobky HM; Zaky AG; Hassan EAM; KhalafAllah MT BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):172. PubMed ID: 31391006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Childhood Obesity. Can ME; Kızıltoprak H; Buluş AD; Özkoyuncu D; Koç M; Özdemir Yıldız Z J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2020 Mar; 57(2):103-107. PubMed ID: 32203594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer. Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Pourjavan S Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 20853262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Intraocular pressure and biomechanical corneal properties measure by ocular response analyser in patients with primary congenital glaucoma. Perucho-González L; Martínez de la Casa JM; Morales-Fernández L; Bañeros-Rojas P; Saenz-Francés F; García-Feijoó J Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e293-7. PubMed ID: 26647905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Modifications in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure after deep sclerectomy. Iordanidou V; Hamard P; Gendron G; Labbé A; Raphael M; Baudouin C J Glaucoma; 2010; 19(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 19661821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Relationship Between Corneal Hysteresis and Corneal Resistance Factor with Other Ocular Parameters. Rosa N; Lanza M; De Bernardo M; Signoriello G; Chiodini P Semin Ophthalmol; 2015; 30(5-6):335-9. PubMed ID: 24506466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry. Touboul D; Roberts C; Kérautret J; Garra C; Maurice-Tison S; Saubusse E; Colin J J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 34(4):616-22. PubMed ID: 18361984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diurnal variation of corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure in normal subjects. Oncel B; Dinc UA; Gorgun E; Yalvaç BI Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):798-803. PubMed ID: 19787600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Topographic and biomechanical evaluation of corneas in patients with ocular rosacea. Yildirim Y; Olcucu O; Agca A; Karakucuk Y; Alagoz N; Mutaf C; Demirok A; Kutlubay Z Cornea; 2015 Mar; 34(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 25611397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Central corneal thickness and biomechanical changes after clear corneal phacoemulsification. de Freitas Valbon B; Ventura MP; da Silva RS; Canedo AL; Velarde GC; Ambrósio R J Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 28(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 22107063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of cornea on intraocular pressure measurement by ICARE PRO and ORA. Pluháček F; Unzeitigová A; Marešová K; Rybář J Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2019; 75(3):111-118. PubMed ID: 31779459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Anterior Segment Biometry and Their Correlation with Corneal Biomechanics in Caucasian Children. Bueno-Gimeno I; Martínez-Albert N; Gené-Sampedro A; España-Gregori E Curr Eye Res; 2019 Feb; 44(2):118-124. PubMed ID: 30346843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]