BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31564553)

  • 1. Multiple-CT optimization: An adaptive optimization method to account for anatomical changes in intensity-modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancers.
    Yang Z; Zhang X; Wang X; Zhu XR; Gunn B; Frank SJ; Chang Y; Li Q; Yang K; Wu G; Liao L; Li Y; Chen M; Li H
    Radiother Oncol; 2020 Jan; 142():124-132. PubMed ID: 31564553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple-CT optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy - Is it possible to eliminate adaptive planning?
    Wang X; Li H; Zhu XR; Hou Q; Liao L; Jiang B; Li Y; Wang P; Lang J; Zhang X
    Radiother Oncol; 2018 Jul; 128(1):167-173. PubMed ID: 29054378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical evaluation of worst-case robust optimization intensity-modulated proton therapy plans using an exhaustive sampling approach.
    Yang Z; Li H; Li Y; Li Y; Chang Y; Li Q; Yang K; Wu G; Sahoo N; Poenisch F; Gillin M; Zhu XR; Zhang X
    Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jul; 14(1):129. PubMed ID: 31324257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dosimetric Evaluation of Incorporating Patient Geometric Variations Into Adaptive Plan Optimization Through Probabilistic Treatment Planning in Head and Neck Cancers.
    Liu Q; Liang J; Zhou D; Krauss DJ; Chen PY; Yan D
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Jul; 101(4):985-997. PubMed ID: 29976511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Including anatomical variations in robust optimization for head and neck proton therapy can reduce the need of adaptation.
    Cubillos-Mesías M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Agolli L; Rehm M; Richter C; Stützer K
    Radiother Oncol; 2019 Feb; 131():127-134. PubMed ID: 30773179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
    Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feasibility of automated proton therapy plan adaptation for head and neck tumors using cone beam CT images.
    Kurz C; Nijhuis R; Reiner M; Ganswindt U; Thieke C; Belka C; Parodi K; Landry G
    Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 11():64. PubMed ID: 27129305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.
    Zaghian M; Cao W; Liu W; Kardar L; Randeniya S; Mohan R; Lim G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):15-25. PubMed ID: 28300378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of robust treatment planning on single- and multi-field optimized plans for proton beam therapy of unilateral head and neck target volumes.
    Cubillos-Mesías M; Baumann M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Löck S; Richter C; Stützer K
    Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):190. PubMed ID: 29183377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of Fully Automated Robust Multicriterial Treatment Planning for Head and Neck Cancer IMPT.
    Huiskes M; Kong W; Oud M; Crama K; Rasch C; Breedveld S; Heijmen B; Astreinidou E
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2024 Jul; 119(3):968-977. PubMed ID: 38284961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative plan robustness of step-and-shoot vs rotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy on repeat computed tomographic simulation for weight loss in head and neck cancer.
    Thomson DJ; Beasley WJ; Garcez K; Lee LW; Sykes AJ; Rowbottom CG; Slevin NJ
    Med Dosim; 2016; 41(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 26993081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multi-scenario based robust intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans can account for set-up errors more effectively in terms of normal tissue sparing than planning target volume (PTV) based intensity-modulated photon plans in the head and neck region.
    Stuschke M; Kaiser A; Abu Jawad J; Pöttgen C; Levegrün S; Farr J
    Radiat Oncol; 2013 Jun; 8():145. PubMed ID: 23773560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of plan robustness against different uncertainty sources for classical and anatomical robust optimized treatment plans in head and neck cancer proton therapy.
    Cubillos-Mesías M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Agolli L; Rehm M; Richter C; Stützer K
    Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190573. PubMed ID: 31778315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anatomic changes in head and neck intensity-modulated proton therapy: Comparison between robust optimization and online adaptation.
    Lalonde A; Bobić M; Winey B; Verburg J; Sharp GC; Paganetti H
    Radiother Oncol; 2021 Jun; 159():39-47. PubMed ID: 33741469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A fast and robust constraint-based online re-optimization approach for automated online adaptive intensity modulated proton therapy in head and neck cancer.
    Oud M; Breedveld S; Rojo-Santiago J; Giżyńska MK; Kroesen M; Habraken S; Perkó Z; Heijmen B; Hoogeman M
    Phys Med Biol; 2024 Mar; 69(7):. PubMed ID: 38373350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the clinical value of automatic online dose restoration for adaptive proton therapy of head and neck cancer.
    Borderías-Villarroel E; Taasti V; Van Elmpt W; Teruel-Rivas S; Geets X; Sterpin E
    Radiother Oncol; 2022 May; 170():190-197. PubMed ID: 35346754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating CT to CBCT image registration for head and neck proton therapy as a tool for daily dose recalculation.
    Landry G; Nijhuis R; Dedes G; Handrack J; Thieke C; Janssens G; Orban de Xivry J; Reiner M; Kamp F; Wilkens JJ; Paganelli C; Riboldi M; Baroni G; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Parodi K
    Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1354-66. PubMed ID: 25735290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improve the dosimetric outcome in bilateral head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy: a feasibility study.
    Liu G; Li X; Qin A; Zheng W; Yan D; Zhang S; Stevens C; Kabolizadeh P; Ding X
    Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jan; 15(1):21. PubMed ID: 32000817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benefit of particle therapy in re-irradiation of head and neck patients. Results of a multicentric in silico ROCOCO trial.
    Eekers DBP; Roelofs E; Jelen U; Kirk M; Granzier M; Ammazzalorso F; Ahn PH; Janssens GORJ; Hoebers FJP; Friedmann T; Solberg T; Walsh S; Troost EGC; Kaanders JHAM; Lambin P
    Radiother Oncol; 2016 Dec; 121(3):387-394. PubMed ID: 27639891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the effect of setup uncertainty reduction and adaptation to geometric changes on normal tissue complication probability using online adaptive head and neck intensity modulated proton therapy.
    Lalonde A; Bobić M; Sharp GC; Chamseddine I; Winey B; Paganetti H
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 May; 68(11):. PubMed ID: 37164020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.