These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31565691)

  • 1. Intra-examiner and Inter-examiner Reproducibility in Irregularity Index Measurements.
    İrezli EC; Şahin MF; Demir R; Baysal A
    Turk J Orthod; 2019 Sep; 32(3):160-164. PubMed ID: 31565691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can the intra-examiner variability of Little's Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts?
    Dowling AH; Burns A; Macauley D; Garvey TM; Fleming GJ
    J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 24012518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The reliability of Little's Irregularity Index for the upper dental arch using three dimensional (3D) digital models.
    Burns A; Dowling AH; Garvey TM; Fleming GJ
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1320-6. PubMed ID: 25064042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the reliability and accuracy of clinical measurements using plaster model and the digital model system based on crowding severity.
    Liang YM; Rutchakitprakarn L; Kuang SH; Wu TY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Sep; 81(9):842-847. PubMed ID: 29395944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity and Reliability of Intraoral and Plaster Models' Photographs in the Assessment of Little's Irregularity Index, Tooth Size-Arch Length Discrepancy, and Bolton's Analysis.
    Alrasheed WA; Owayda AM; Hajeer MY; Khattab TZ; Almahdi WH
    Cureus; 2022 Mar; 14(3):e23067. PubMed ID: 35308184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and intra-examiner agreement of orthodontic model analysis with a digital caliper on plaster and printed dental models.
    Koretsi V; Kirschbauer C; Proff P; Kirschneck C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Aug; 23(8):3387-3396. PubMed ID: 30539294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeatability and reproducibility of anterior lens zonule length measurement using ArcScan insight 100 very high-frequency ultrasound.
    Zhu Z; Zou H; Li H; Wu X; Wang Y; Li Z; Zhao Y
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2023; 20(8):703-710. PubMed ID: 37300312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of probing depth assessments at healthy implant sites and natural teeth.
    Ramanauskaite A; Obreja K; Schwarz F; Jepsen K; Cosgarea R; Bunke J; Eisenbeiss AK; Schulz J; Flörke C; Eberhard C; Kocher T; Jablonowski L; Jepsen S; Holtfreter B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun; 27(6):2533-2545. PubMed ID: 36462039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.
    Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intra- and inter-examiner reliability of intraoral malocclusion assessment.
    Ovsenik M; Farcnik F; Verdenik I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 17290020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three dimensional evaluation of posture in standing with the PosturePrint: an intra- and inter-examiner reliability study.
    Normand MC; Descarreaux M; Harrison DD; Harrison DE; Perron DL; Ferrantelli JR; Janik TJ
    Chiropr Osteopat; 2007 Sep; 15():15. PubMed ID: 17892559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of Cusp Angulation Using Three-Dimensional Digital Models: A Preliminary In Vitro Study.
    Liu X; Chen X
    Methods Inf Med; 2022 Sep; 61(3-04):90-98. PubMed ID: 35668665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.
    Czarnota J; Hey J; Fuhrmann R
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26753549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Periodontal repair in dogs: examiner reproducibility in the supraalveolar periodontal defect model.
    Koo KT; Polimeni G; Albandar JM; Wikesjö UM
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Jun; 31(6):439-42. PubMed ID: 15142212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using Little's Irregularity Index in orthodontics: outdated and inaccurate?
    Macauley D; Garvey TM; Dowling AH; Fleming GJ
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1127-33. PubMed ID: 23000526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inter-arch digital model vs. manual cast measurements: Accuracy and reliability.
    Kiviahde H; Bukovac L; Jussila P; Pesonen P; Sipilä K; Raustia A; Pirttiniemi P
    Cranio; 2018 Jul; 36(4):222-227. PubMed ID: 28659050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility of manual probing depth.
    Andrade R; Espinoza M; Gómez EM; Espinoza JR; Cruz E
    Braz Oral Res; 2012; 26(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 22344339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of Reliability of Three Indices Measuring Gingival Overgrowth.
    Safa Alkateb A; Ozturk Ozener H; Kuru L
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 2023 Jun; 57(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 37427360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses.
    Naidu D; Scott J; Ong D; Ho CT
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 20043542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner.
    Camardella LT; Breuning H; de Vasconcellos Vilella O
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 May; 78(3):211-220. PubMed ID: 28074260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.