BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31565979)

  • 21. A Comparative Study of a Novel Adhesive Bone Conduction Device and Conventional Treatment Options for Conductive Hearing Loss.
    Skarzynski PH; Ratuszniak A; Osinska K; Koziel M; Krol B; Cywka KB; Skarzynski H
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Aug; 40(7):858-864. PubMed ID: 31295197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Surgical and functional outcomes of two types of transcutaneous bone conduction implants.
    Scotta G; Allam A; Dimitriadis PA; Wright K; Yardley M; Ray J
    J Laryngol Otol; 2020 Dec; 134(12):1065-1068. PubMed ID: 33336637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of traditional bone-conduction hearing AIDS with the Baha system.
    Christensen L; Smith-Olinde L; Kimberlain J; Richter GT; Dornhoffer JL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Apr; 21(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 20388452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Initial UK Experience With a Novel Magnetic Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Device.
    Carr SD; Moraleda J; Procter V; Wright K; Ray J
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Sep; 36(8):1399-402. PubMed ID: 26196208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The bone conduction implant: Clinical results of the first six patients.
    Reinfeldt S; Håkansson B; Taghavi H; Fredén Jansson KJ; Eeg-Olofsson M
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):408-16. PubMed ID: 25705995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bilateral bone conduction stimulation provides reliable binaural cues for localization.
    Snapp H; Vogt K; Agterberg MJH
    Hear Res; 2020 Mar; 388():107881. PubMed ID: 31945691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surgery for the bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Arnold A; Caversaccio MD; Mudry A
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 71():47-55. PubMed ID: 21389704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The bone-anchored hearing aid for children: recent developments.
    Snik A; Leijendeckers J; Hol M; Mylanus E; Cremers C
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Sep; 47(9):554-9. PubMed ID: 18821224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Abutment-free bone-anchored hearing devices in children: initial results and experience.
    Centric A; Chennupati SK
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 May; 78(5):875-8. PubMed ID: 24612554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Three-year experience with the Sophono in children with congenital conductive unilateral hearing loss: tolerability, audiometry, and sound localization compared to a bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Nelissen RC; Agterberg MJ; Hol MK; Snik AF
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 273(10):3149-56. PubMed ID: 26924741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Innovation in abutment-free bone-anchored hearing devices in children: Updated results and experience.
    Baker S; Centric A; Chennupati SK
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Oct; 79(10):1667-72. PubMed ID: 26279245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Post-implantation clinical cost analysis between transcutaneous and percutaneous bone conduction devices.
    Aukema TW; Teunissen EM; Janssen AM; Hol MKS; Mylanus EAM
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jan; 281(1):117-127. PubMed ID: 37421428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of transducer attachment on vibration transmission and transcranial attenuation for direct drive bone conduction stimulation.
    Rigato C; Reinfeldt S; Håkansson B; Fredén Jansson KJ; Renvall E; Eeg-Olofsson M
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 381():107763. PubMed ID: 31387072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An overview of different systems: the bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Dun CAJ; Faber HT; de Wolf MJF; Cremers CWRJ; Hol MKS
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 71():22-31. PubMed ID: 21389701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does hearing in response to soft-tissue stimulation involve skull vibrations? A within-subject comparison between skull vibration magnitudes and hearing thresholds.
    Chordekar S; Perez R; Adelman C; Sohmer H; Kishon-Rabin L
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():59-67. PubMed ID: 29678325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Audiological outcome measures with the BONEBRIDGE transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: impact of noise, reverberation and signal processing features.
    Curca IA; Parsa V; Macpherson EA; Scollie S; Vansevenant K; Zimmerman K; Lewis-Teeter J; Allen P; Parnes L; Agrawal S
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Jul; 59(7):556-565. PubMed ID: 32069128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of a new powerful bone-anchored hearing system: a comparison study.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Hol MK; Mylanus EA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 23886427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Results of pediatric bone-anchored hearing aid implantation.
    Seemann R; Liu R; Di Toppa J
    J Otolaryngol; 2004 Apr; 33(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 15518092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Rehabilitation of patients with conductive hearing loss and moderate mental retardation by means of a bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Kunst SJ; Hol MK; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):653-8. PubMed ID: 16788427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical performance of the Osia™ system, a new active osseointegrated implant system. Results from a prospective clinical investigation.
    Goycoolea M; Ribalta G; Tocornal F; Levy R; Alarcón P; Bryman M; Cagnacci B; Catenacci C; Oyanguren V; Vilches I; Briones V; García R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2020 Mar; 140(3):212-219. PubMed ID: 32068449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.