314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31567907)
1. Threshold Automated Perimetry of the Full Visual Field in Patients With Glaucoma With Mild Visual Loss.
Wall M; Lee EJ; Wanzek RJ; Zamba KD; Turpin A; Chong LX; Marin-Franch I
J Glaucoma; 2019 Nov; 28(11):997-1005. PubMed ID: 31567907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Temporal Wedge Defects in Glaucoma: Structure/Function Correlation With Threshold Automated Perimetry of the Full Visual Field.
Wall M; Lee EJ; Wanzek RJ; Chong LX; Turpin A
J Glaucoma; 2020 Mar; 29(3):191-197. PubMed ID: 32108691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantification and Predictors of Visual Field Variability in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect, and Glaucomatous Eyes Using SITA-Faster.
Tan JCK; Agar A; Kalloniatis M; Phu J
Ophthalmology; 2024 Jun; 131(6):658-666. PubMed ID: 38110124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Size threshold perimetry performs as well as conventional automated perimetry with stimulus sizes III, V, and VI for glaucomatous loss.
Wall M; Doyle CK; Eden T; Zamba KD; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jun; 54(6):3975-83. PubMed ID: 23633660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.
Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Threshold Static Automated Perimetry of the Full Visual Field in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.
Wall M; Subramani A; Chong LX; Galindo R; Turpin A; Kardon RH; Thurtell MJ; Bailey JA; Marin-Franch I
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2019 May; 60(6):1898-1905. PubMed ID: 31042797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of false-negative responses for full threshold and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal observers.
Johnson CA; Sherman K; Doyle C; Wall M
J Glaucoma; 2014; 23(5):288-92. PubMed ID: 23632399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Octopus 900 Automated Kinetic Perimetry versus Standard Automated Static Perimetry in Glaucoma Practice.
Rowe FJ; Czanner G; Somerville T; Sood I; Sood D
Curr Eye Res; 2021 Jan; 46(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 32564629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reclaiming the Periphery: Automated Kinetic Perimetry for Measuring Peripheral Visual Fields in Patients With Glaucoma.
Mönter VM; Crabb DP; Artes PH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 58(2):868-875. PubMed ID: 28159974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effective Dynamic Ranges for Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression With Standard Automated Perimetry and Stimulus Sizes III and V.
Wall M; Zamba GKD; Artes PH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Jan; 59(1):439-445. PubMed ID: 29356822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Total deviation probability plots for stimulus size v perimetry: a comparison with size III stimuli.
Wall M; Brito CF; Woodward KR; Doyle CK; Kardon RH; Johnson CA
Arch Ophthalmol; 2008 Apr; 126(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 18413515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flicker defined form perimetry in glaucoma suspects with normal achromatic visual fields.
Reznicek L; Lamparter J; Vogel M; Kampik A; Hirneiß C
Curr Eye Res; 2015 Jul; 40(7):683-9. PubMed ID: 25207744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).
Johnson CA; Sample PA; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JR; Weinreb RN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12140023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of functional visual field loss by automated static perimetry.
Frisén L
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 24698019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual Field Plots: A Comparison Study Between Standard Automated Perimetry and Eye Movement Perimetry.
Mazumdar D; Pel JJM; Kadavath Meethal NS; Asokan R; Panday M; Steen JVD; George R
J Glaucoma; 2020 May; 29(5):351-361. PubMed ID: 32108671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Frequency doubling technology perimetry using a 24--2 stimulus presentation pattern.
Johnson CA; Cioffi GA; Van Buskirk EM
Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 76(8):571-81. PubMed ID: 10472963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) to monitor advanced glaucomatous visual field loss.
Nevalainen J; Paetzold J; Krapp E; Vonthein R; Johnson CA; Schiefer U
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 246(9):1331-9. PubMed ID: 18563431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated perimetry detects visual field loss before manual Goldmann perimetry.
Katz J; Tielsch JM; Quigley HA; Sommer A
Ophthalmology; 1995 Jan; 102(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 7831036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
