These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31568366)

  • 21. Legal Considerations in Genetic Screening and Testing: Three Case Studies: ACOG Committee Opinion Summary, Number 805.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 135(4):994-995. PubMed ID: 32217975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Legal Considerations in Genetic Screening and Testing: Three Case Studies: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 805.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 135(4):e189-e192. PubMed ID: 32217981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. AGOG Committee Opinion. Number 370. July 2007. Institutional responsibility to provide legal representation.
    Committee on Ethics
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 110(1):215-6. PubMed ID: 17601924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multiple pregnancy: knowledge and practice patterns of obstetricians and gynecologists.
    Cleary-Goldman J; Morgan MA; Robinson JN; D'Alton ME; Schulkin J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Aug; 104(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 15291992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 374: Expert testimony.
    Committee on Ethics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):445-6. PubMed ID: 17666622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. ACOG committee opinion. Role of the obstetrician-gynecologist in the diagnosis and treatment of breast disease. Number 186, September 1997 (replaces no. 140, June 1994). Committee on Gynecologic Practice. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1997 Nov; 59(2):162-3. PubMed ID: 9431885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ACOG committee opinion. Sexual misconduct in the practice of obstetrics and gynecology: ethical considerations. Number 144--November 1994. Committee on Ethics. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1995 Feb; 48(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 7789607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. ACOG committee opinion number 286, October 2003: patient safety in obstetrics and gynecology.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Oct; 102(4):883-5. PubMed ID: 14551024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Counseling center for forensic expert questions of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics and the Professional Society of Gynecologists].
    Ratzel R; Schneider J; Ludwig H
    Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 7959313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Obstetric and gynecologic malpractice claims in Saudi Arabia: Incidence and cause.
    AlDakhil LO
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 May; 40():8-11. PubMed ID: 26947435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. ACOG committee opinion. Scope of services for uncomplicated obstetric care. Number 175, September 1996 (replaces no. 79, January 1990). American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1996 Dec; 55(3):309. PubMed ID: 9003960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The 1992 ACOG survey. Professional liability: is gender a factor?
    Malkasian GD
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1993 Nov; 78(11):26-32, 48. PubMed ID: 10129536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Commentary on ACOG Committee Opinion #108 May 1992, ethical dimensions of informed consent.
    Abrams FR
    Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 8318116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. ACOG committee opinion. Credentialing guidelines for new operative procedures. Number 142--August 1994 (replaces no. 75, November 1989; no. 89, December 1990; no. 106, April 1992; and no. 107, April 1992). Committee on Gynecologic Practice. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1994 Dec; 47(3):313. PubMed ID: 7705546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Limiting Conscience Rights in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
    American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    Issues Law Med; 2023; 38(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 38165263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Overview of professional liability.
    Chervenak JL
    Clin Perinatol; 2007 Jun; 34(2):227-32, v. PubMed ID: 17572231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 334, May 2006 (replaces No. 186, September 1997): Role of the obstetrician-gynecologist in the screening and diagnosis of breast masses.
    Committee on Gynecologic Practice, ACOG
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 May; 107(5):1213-4. PubMed ID: 16648435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Professional liability payments in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Dillon WP; John Y
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jul; 108(1):207-8; author reply 208. PubMed ID: 16816078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 357: Primary and preventive care: periodic assessments.
    ACOG Committee on Gynecologic Practice
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Dec; 108(6):1615-22. PubMed ID: 17138804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The challenge of care for the poor and underserved in the United States. An American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists perspective on access to care for underserved women.
    Davidson EC; Gibbs CE; Chapin J
    Am J Dis Child; 1991 May; 145(5):546-9. PubMed ID: 2042620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.