These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31568660)
21. Influence of Preparation Type and Tooth Geometry on the Accuracy of Different Intraoral Scanners. Ashraf Y; Sabet A; Hamdy A; Ebeid K J Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 29(9):800-804. PubMed ID: 32406156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study. Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Kourakis G; Pavlakis E J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 31870614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study. Mangano FG; Hauschild U; Veronesi G; Imburgia M; Mangano C; Admakin O BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):101. PubMed ID: 31170969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner. Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 31860144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. Ender A; Mehl A J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In vivo trueness and precision of full-arch implant scans using intraoral scanners with three different acquisition protocols. Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Thulin M; Nyström I; Thor A J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104308. PubMed ID: 36481688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of the trueness and precision of eight extraoral laboratory scanners with a complete-arch model: a three-dimensional analysis. Emir F; Ayyıldız S J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Oct; 63(4):434-439. PubMed ID: 30954395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of scan substrates on accuracy of 7 intraoral digital impression systems using human maxilla model. Bocklet C; Renne W; Mennito A; Bacro T; Latham J; Evans Z; Ludlow M; Kelly A; Nash J Orthod Craniofac Res; 2019 May; 22 Suppl 1():168-174. PubMed ID: 31074138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners. Revilla-León M; Jiang P; Sadeghpour M; Piedra-Cascón W; Zandinejad A; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Sep; 124(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 31864638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy of single implant scans with a combined healing abutment-scan body system and different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study. Çakmak G; Donmez MB; Atalay S; Yilmaz H; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103773. PubMed ID: 34384842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of definitive and interim restorative materials and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner. Revilla-León M; Young K; Sicilia E; Cho SH; Kois JC J Dent; 2022 May; 120():104114. PubMed ID: 35358659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of intraoral scanning in completely and partially edentulous maxillary and mandibular jaws: an in vitro analysis. Schimmel M; Akino N; Srinivasan M; Wittneben JG; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):1839-1847. PubMed ID: 32812098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Influence of Liquid on the Tooth Surface on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study. Chen Y; Zhai Z; Li H; Yamada S; Matsuoka T; Ono S; Nakano T J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 33829613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. Renne W; Ludlow M; Fryml J; Schurch Z; Mennito A; Kessler R; Lauer A J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 28024822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of splinting scan bodies on trueness of complete-arch implant impression using different intraoral scanners: an in vitro study. Retana L; Nejat AH; Pozzi A Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Feb; 26(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 35072425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy and precision of intraoral and extraoral complete-arch scans. Baghani MT; Shayegh SS; Johnston WM; Shidfar S; Hakimaneh SMR J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):665-670. PubMed ID: 33070974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy of intraoral scans: An in vivo study of different scanning devices. Kernen F; Schlager S; Seidel Alvarez V; Mehrhof J; Vach K; Kohal R; Nelson K; Flügge T J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1303-1309. PubMed ID: 33902891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of substrate adjacent to the scan region on the trueness of four intraoral scanners: An in vitro study. Elter B; Tak Ö J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104729. PubMed ID: 37778497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners. Treesh JC; Liacouras PC; Taft RM; Brooks DI; Raiciulescu S; Ellert DO; Grant GT; Ye L J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):382-388. PubMed ID: 29724554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Accuracy analysis of full-arch implant digital impressions when using a geometric feature]. Ke YF; Zhang YP; Chen JK; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun YC Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 57(2):162-167. PubMed ID: 35152652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]