These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31568660)
41. [Accuracy analysis of full-arch implant digital impressions when using a geometric feature]. Ke YF; Zhang YP; Chen JK; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun YC Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 57(2):162-167. PubMed ID: 35152652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Effects of Scanning Strategy and Scanner Type on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: A New Approach for Assessing the Accuracy of Scanned Data. Oh KC; Park JM; Moon HS J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):518-523. PubMed ID: 32133690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Accuracy evaluation of intraoral optical impressions: A clinical study using a reference appliance. Atieh MA; Ritter AV; Ko CC; Duqum I J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):400-405. PubMed ID: 28222869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Accuracy of Digital Impressions Obtained Using Six Intraoral Scanners in Partially Edentulous Dentitions and the Effect of Scanning Sequence. Diker B; Tak Ö Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(1):101-108. PubMed ID: 33570525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparative analysis on efficiency and accuracy of parallel confocal microscopy and three-dimensional in motion video with triangulation technology-based intraoral scanner under influence of moisture and mouth opening - A crossover clinical trial. Sindhu JS; Maiti S; Nallaswamy D J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023; 23(3):234-243. PubMed ID: 37929362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: A novel in vivo analysis method. Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Nyström I; Rydén J; Thor A J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():110-118. PubMed ID: 29246490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis. Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The effect of scanner type and scan body position on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant scans. Çakmak G; Yilmaz H; Treviño A; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 22(4):533-541. PubMed ID: 32643259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluation of the accuracy of 2 digital intraoral scanners: A 3D analysis study. Alzahrani SJ; El-Hammali H; Morgano SM; Elkassaby H J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):787-792. PubMed ID: 33172647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Scanning accuracy of nondental structured light extraoral scanners compared with that of a dental-specific scanner. Piedra-Cascón W; Methani MM; Quesada-Olmo N; Jiménez-Martínez MJ; Revilla-León M J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):110-114. PubMed ID: 32665118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Use of Intraoral Scanners for Full Dental Arches: Could Different Strategies or Overlapping Software Affect Accuracy? Stefanelli LV; Franchina A; Pranno A; Pellegrino G; Ferri A; Pranno N; Di Carlo S; De Angelis F Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(19):. PubMed ID: 34639250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Intraoral Scans of Full Dental Arches: An In Vitro Measurement Study of the Accuracy of Different Intraoral Scanners. Giuliodori G; Rappelli G; Aquilanti L Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 36981684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Investigation of accuracy and reproducibility of abutment position by intraoral scanners. Fukazawa S; Odaira C; Kondo H J Prosthodont Res; 2017 Oct; 61(4):450-459. PubMed ID: 28216020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Error propagation from intraoral scanning to additive manufacturing of complete-arch dentate models: An in vitro study. Auškalnis L; Akulauskas M; Jegelevičius D; Simonaitis T; Rutkūnas V J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104136. PubMed ID: 35460866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Accuracy of intraoral scanners in different complete arch scan patterns. Pattamavilai S; Ongthiemsak C J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):155-162. PubMed ID: 35256181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study. Jeong ID; Lee JJ; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jun; 115(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 26794703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effect of pulp chamber depth on the accuracy of endocrown scans made with different intraoral scanners versus an industrial scanner: An in vitro study. Gurpinar B; Tak O J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):430-437. PubMed ID: 33309210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete-arch mandibular casts: A comparative in vitro study. Braian M; Wennerberg A J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):129-136.e2. PubMed ID: 30885584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review. Kihara H; Hatakeyama W; Komine F; Takafuji K; Takahashi T; Yokota J; Oriso K; Kondo H J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Apr; 64(2):109-113. PubMed ID: 31474576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Torsion and linear accuracy in intraoral scans obtained with different scanning principles. Schmidt A; Benedickt CR; Schlenz MA; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Apr; 64(2):167-174. PubMed ID: 31257052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]