These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31568660)

  • 61. Do "cut out-rescan" procedures have an impact on the accuracy of intraoral digital scans?
    Reich S; Yatmaz B; Raith S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 32059858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner.
    Müller P; Ender A; Joda T; Katsoulis J
    Quintessence Int; 2016 Apr; 47(4):343-9. PubMed ID: 26824085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Effect of Scanner Type and Scan Body Location on the Accuracy of Mandibular Complete-Arch Digital Implant Scans: An In Vitro Study.
    Çakmak G; Yilmaz H; Treviño Santos A; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):419-426. PubMed ID: 34453466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Comparison of Accuracy Between a Conventional and Two Digital Intraoral Impression Techniques.
    Malik J; Rodriguez J; Weisbloom M; Petridis H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 29518805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Influence of interdental spaces and the palate on the accuracy of maxillary scans acquired using different intraoral scanners.
    Akl MA; Daifallah K; Pérez-Barquero JA; Barmak AB; Wee AG; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):125-134. PubMed ID: 37591814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Influence of rescanning mesh holes on the accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vivo study.
    Revilla-León M; Quesada-Olmo N; Gómez-Polo M; Sicilia E; Farjas-Abadia M; Kois JC
    J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103851. PubMed ID: 34656658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Influence of ambient temperature changes on intraoral scanning accuracy.
    Revilla-León M; Gohil A; Barmak AB; Gómez-Polo M; Pérez-Barquero JA; Att W; Kois JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):755-760. PubMed ID: 35210107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The effect of different tooth preparation finishing procedures and immediate dentin sealing on the scanning accuracy of different intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M; Cascos-Sánchez R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Gómez-Polo M
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104431. PubMed ID: 36682722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis.
    Nedelcu RG; Persson AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1461-71. PubMed ID: 25134995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The effect of scanned area on the accuracy and time of anterior single implant scans: An in vitro study.
    Yilmaz B; Rizzo Marques V; Guo X; Gouveia D; Abou-Ayash S
    J Dent; 2021 Jun; 109():103620. PubMed ID: 33647374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Evaluation of laboratory scanner accuracy by a novel calibration block for complete-arch implant rehabilitation.
    Pan Y; Tam JM; Tsoi JK; Lam WY; Huang R; Chen Z; Pow EH
    J Dent; 2020 Nov; 102():103476. PubMed ID: 32961260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Accuracy of 4 digital scanning systems on prepared teeth digitally isolated from a complete dental arch.
    Medina-Sotomayor P; Pascual-Moscardo A; Camps A I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):811-820. PubMed ID: 30598308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Evaluation of trueness and precision of two intraoral scanners and a conventional impression: an in vivo clinical study.
    Jorquera GJ; Sampaio CS; Bozzalla A; Hirata R; Sánchez JP
    Quintessence Int; 2021 Oct; 52(10):904-910. PubMed ID: 34410071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations.
    Park JM; Kim RJ; Lee KW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 31027953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Effect of Scan Pattern on the Accuracy of Complete-Arch Digital Implant Impressions with Two Intraoral Scanners.
    Li Z; Huang R; Wu X; Chen Z; Huang B; Chen Z
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):731-739. PubMed ID: 35904829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Sources of error in maximum intercuspation from complete dentate full-arch intraoral scans in vitro.
    Osnes C; Wu J; Ferrari M; Joda T; Keeling A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Sep; 24(3):283-291. PubMed ID: 34553893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Influence of crown shade, translucency, and scan powder application on the trueness of intraoral scanners.
    Hlaing NHMM; Lee H; Jeong Y; Park JM; Lee SJ; Lee JH
    J Dent; 2024 May; 144():104969. PubMed ID: 38537881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. In vitro comparison of trueness of 10 intraoral scanners for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.
    Bilmenoglu C; Cilingir A; Geckili O; Bilhan H; Bilgin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):755-760. PubMed ID: 31987587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The impact of software updates on accuracy of intraoral scanners.
    Schmalzl J; Róth I; Borbély J; Hermann P; Vecsei B
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Apr; 23(1):219. PubMed ID: 37061664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Accuracy of single-abutment digital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners.
    Lee JJ; Jeong ID; Park JY; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Kim WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb; 117(2):253-259. PubMed ID: 27666500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.