BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31568866)

  • 1. Don't trick me: An event-related potentials investigation of how price deception decreases consumer purchase intention.
    Fu H; Ma H; Bian J; Wang C; Zhou J; Ma Q
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Nov; 713():134522. PubMed ID: 31568866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying deceptive hazard evaluation: An event-related potentials investigation.
    Fu H; Qiu W; Ma H; Ma Q
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182892. PubMed ID: 28793344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Telling a truth to deceive: Examining executive control and reward-related processes underlying interpersonal deception.
    Sai L; Wu H; Hu X; Fu G
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Aug; 125():149-156. PubMed ID: 29990705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: an event-related brain potential study.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):386-404. PubMed ID: 16099352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Utilitarian or hedonic: Event-related potential evidence of purchase intention bias during online shopping festivals.
    Shang Q; Jin J; Qiu J
    Neurosci Lett; 2020 Jan; 715():134665. PubMed ID: 31794790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. My friends have a word for it: Event-related potentials evidence of how social risk inhibits purchase intention.
    Shang Q; Pei G; Jin J
    Neurosci Lett; 2017 Mar; 643():70-75. PubMed ID: 28215877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The processes leading to deception: ERP spatiotemporal principal component analysis and source analysis.
    Sun SY; Mai X; Liu C; Liu JY; Luo YJ
    Soc Neurosci; 2011; 6(4):348-59. PubMed ID: 21225491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A truth that's told with bad intent: an ERP study of deception.
    Carrión RE; Keenan JP; Sebanz N
    Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 19836013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How consumers are affected by product descriptions in online shopping: Event-related potentials evidence of the attribute framing effect.
    Jin J; Zhang W; Chen M
    Neurosci Res; 2017 Dec; 125():21-28. PubMed ID: 28734975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of empathy with nature on green purchase behavior: An ERP study.
    Jing K; Qi M; Mei Y; Chen L
    Neurosci Lett; 2022 Jul; 784():136745. PubMed ID: 35718238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An event-related potential study of deception to self preferences.
    Tu S; Li H; Jou J; Zhang Q; Wang T; Yu C; Qiu J
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1247():142-8. PubMed ID: 18952072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of conflict processing mechanism in deception responses.
    Wu J; Huang J; Li J; Chen X; Xiao Y
    Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):18300. PubMed ID: 36316417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consumers' Decision-Making Process on Social Commerce Platforms: Online Trust, Perceived Risk, and Purchase Intentions.
    Lăzăroiu G; Neguriţă O; Grecu I; Grecu G; Mitran PC
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():890. PubMed ID: 32499740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using event related potentials to identify a user's behavioural intention aroused by product form design.
    Ding Y; Guo F; Zhang X; Qu Q; Liu W
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Jul; 55():117-123. PubMed ID: 26995041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(7):878-901. PubMed ID: 14998703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of reviewer's review volumes on online consumer reviews' perceived usefulness: An event-related potential study.
    Liu J; Mo Z; Gao H
    Neurosci Lett; 2021 Sep; 762():136139. PubMed ID: 34324959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
    Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When does the discount look more attractive: neural correlates of discount framing effect in the purchase of bundles.
    Mo Z; Ma H; Wei W; Wang C; Fu H
    Neuroreport; 2019 Jul; 30(10):718-724. PubMed ID: 31045848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Event-related potentials evidence of how location contiguity influences consumer purchase intentions.
    Song L; Mo Z; Liu J
    Neurosci Lett; 2023 Sep; 814():137472. PubMed ID: 37689344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological markers of working memory usage as an index for truth-based lies.
    Lo YH; Tseng P
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 18(6):1089-1104. PubMed ID: 30022430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.