167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31569078)
21. Clinical evaluation of PET image reconstruction using a spatial resolution model.
Andersen FL; Klausen TL; Loft A; Beyer T; Holm S
Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):862-9. PubMed ID: 23254158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A virtual-pinhole PET device for improving contrast recovery and enhancing lesion detectability of a one-meter-long PET scanner: a simulation study.
Jiang J; Hua J; Wang H; Yuan Z; Meng Y; Lu H; Liu S; Chen Y; Tai YC
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Jul; 68(14):. PubMed ID: 37336207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Scanning rats on the high resolution research tomograph (HRRT): a comparison study with a dedicated micro-PET.
Blinder SA; Dinelle K; Sossi V
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5073-83. PubMed ID: 22894433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Resolution modeling in projection space using a factorized multi-block detector response function for PET image reconstruction.
Xu H; Lenz M; Caldeira L; Ma B; Pietrzyk U; Lerche C; Shah NJ; Scheins J
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jul; 64(14):145012. PubMed ID: 31158824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Practical considerations for image-based PSF and blobs reconstruction in PET.
Stute S; Comtat C
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(11):3849-70. PubMed ID: 23681172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of time-of-flight and point-spread-function in SUV quantification for oncological PET.
Prieto E; Domínguez-Prado I; García-Velloso MJ; Peñuelas I; Richter JÁ; Martí-Climent JM
Clin Nucl Med; 2013 Feb; 38(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 23334123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of point spread function reconstruction on quantitative 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging parameters and inter-reader reproducibility in solid tumors.
Sheikhbahaei S; Marcus C; Wray R; Rahmim A; Lodge MA; Subramaniam RM
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Mar; 37(3):288-96. PubMed ID: 26650959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A novel partial volume effects correction technique integrating deconvolution associated with denoising within an iterative PET image reconstruction.
Merlin T; Visvikis D; Fernandez P; Lamare F
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):804-19. PubMed ID: 25652494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Harmonizing FDG PET quantification while maintaining optimal lesion detection: prospective multicentre validation in 517 oncology patients.
Quak E; Le Roux PY; Hofman MS; Robin P; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns D; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(13):2072-82. PubMed ID: 26219870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Recovery of missing data in partial geometry PET scanners: Compensation in projection space vs image space.
Shojaeilangari S; Schmidtlein CR; Rahmim A; Ay MR
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5437-5449. PubMed ID: 30288762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Study of a high-resolution PET system using a silicon detector probe.
Brzeziński K; Oliver JF; Gillam J; Rafecas M
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 59(20):6117-40. PubMed ID: 25254926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Single scan parameterization of space-variant point spread functions in image space via a printed array: the impact for two PET/CT scanners.
Kotasidis FA; Matthews JC; Angelis GI; Noonan PJ; Jackson A; Price P; Lionheart WR; Reader AJ
Phys Med Biol; 2011 May; 56(10):2917-42. PubMed ID: 21490382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Relaxed ordered subset preconditioned alternating projection algorithm for PET reconstruction with automated penalty weight selection.
Ross Schmidtlein C; Lin Y; Li S; Krol A; Beattie BJ; Humm JL; Xu Y
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4083-4097. PubMed ID: 28437565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Theoretical Analysis of Penalized Maximum-Likelihood Patlak Parametric Image Reconstruction in Dynamic PET for Lesion Detection.
Yang L; Wang G; Qi J
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Apr; 35(4):947-56. PubMed ID: 26625407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The edge artifact in the point-spread function-based PET reconstruction at different sphere-to-background ratios of radioactivity.
Kidera D; Kihara K; Akamatsu G; Mikasa S; Taniguchi T; Tsutsui Y; Takeshita T; Maebatake A; Miwa K; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 26531181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Feasibility study of a point-of-care positron emission tomography system with interactive imaging capability.
Jiang J; Li K; Komarov S; O'Sullivan JA; Tai YC
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1798-1813. PubMed ID: 30667069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of the impact of modeling axial compression on PET image reconstruction.
Belzunce MA; Reader AJ
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5172-5186. PubMed ID: 28681375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Application and evaluation of a measured spatially variant system model for PET image reconstruction.
Alessio AM; Stearns CW; Tong S; Ross SG; Kohlmyer S; Ganin A; Kinahan PE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Mar; 29(3):938-49. PubMed ID: 20199927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Penalized maximum-likelihood reconstruction for improving limited-angle artifacts in a dedicated head and neck PET system.
Zhang H; Wang Y; Qi J; Abbaszadeh S
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Aug; 65(16):165016. PubMed ID: 32325441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
