These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31569118)

  • 1. Modality Effects on Lexical Encoding and Memory Representations of Spoken Words.
    Bielski LM; Byom L; Seitz PF; Grant KW
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):825-837. PubMed ID: 31569118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length.
    Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interactions Between Item Set and Vocoding in Serial Recall.
    Bosen AK; Luckasen MC
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1404-1417. PubMed ID: 31033634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alexander G
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e360-e376. PubMed ID: 27438869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examination of the neighborhood activation theory in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dirks DD; Takayanagi S; Moshfegh A; Noffsinger PD; Fausti SA
    Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11271971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audiovisual Enhancement of Speech Perception in Noise by School-Age Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.
    Lalonde K; McCreery RW
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):705-719. PubMed ID: 32032226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual Doping: An Audiovisual Facilitation Effect on Auditory Speech Processing, From Phonetic Feature Extraction to Sentence Identification in Noise.
    Moradi S; Lidestam B; Ning Ng EH; Danielsson H; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):312-327. PubMed ID: 29870521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reconstructing wholes from parts: effects of modality, age, and hearing loss on word recognition.
    Krull V; Humes LE; Kidd GR
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):e14-23. PubMed ID: 23165223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
    Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection and Attention for Auditory, Visual, and Audiovisual Speech in Children with Hearing Loss.
    Jerger S; Damian MF; Karl C; Abdi H
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):508-520. PubMed ID: 31592903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Memory Span for Spoken Digits in Adults With Cochlear Implants or Typical Hearing: Effects of Age and Identification Ability.
    Cleary M; Wilkinson T; Wilson L; Goupell MJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 61(8):2099-2114. PubMed ID: 30073267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. During Lipreading Training With Sentence Stimuli, Feedback Controls Learning and Generalization to Audiovisual Speech in Noise.
    Bernstein LE; Auer ET; Eberhardt SP
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Mar; 31(1):57-77. PubMed ID: 34965362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modality-Specific Perceptual Learning of Vocoded Auditory versus Lipread Speech: Different Effects of Prior Information.
    Bernstein LE; Auer ET; Eberhardt SP
    Brain Sci; 2023 Jun; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37508940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.
    Gordon-Salant S; Cole SS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phonological Priming in Children with Hearing Loss: Effect of Speech Mode, Fidelity, and Lexical Status.
    Jerger S; Tye-Murray N; Damian MF; Abdi H
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):623-633. PubMed ID: 27438867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of Lexical Content on Dichotic Speech Recognition in Older Adults.
    Findlen UM; Roup CM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 26809323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effect of Background Noise on Immediate Free Recall of Words in Younger and Older Listeners with Hearing Loss.
    Hwang JS; Jung Y; Lee JH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Nov; 31(10):701-707. PubMed ID: 33588512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Audiovisual spoken word training can promote or impede auditory-only perceptual learning: prelingually deafened adults with late-acquired cochlear implants versus normal hearing adults.
    Bernstein LE; Eberhardt SP; Auer ET
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():934. PubMed ID: 25206344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.