196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31569287)
1. High-resolution esophageal manometry in pediatrics: Effect of esophageal length on diagnostic measures.
Singendonk MMJ; Ferris LF; McCall L; Seiboth G; Lowe K; Moore D; Hammond P; Couper R; Abu-Assi R; Cock C; Benninga MA; van Wijk MP; Omari TI;
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2020 Jan; 32(1):e13721. PubMed ID: 31569287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Applying the Chicago Classification criteria of esophageal motility to a pediatric cohort: effects of patient age and size.
Singendonk MM; Kritas S; Cock C; Ferris L; McCall L; Rommel N; van Wijk MP; Benninga MA; Moore D; Omari TI
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2014 Sep; 26(9):1333-41. PubMed ID: 25053225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Refining the criterion for an abnormal Integrated Relaxation Pressure in esophageal pressure topography based on the pattern of esophageal contractility using a classification and regression tree model.
Lin Z; Kahrilas PJ; Roman S; Boris L; Carlson D; Pandolfino JE
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2012 Aug; 24(8):e356-63. PubMed ID: 22716041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of two high-resolution manometry software systems in evaluating esophageal motor function.
Rengarajan A; Drapekin J; Patel A; Gyawali CP
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1836-1843. PubMed ID: 27353018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An analysis of distal esophageal impedance in individuals with and without esophageal motility abnormalities.
Blonski W; Hila A; Vela MF; Castell DO
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Aug; 42(7):776-81. PubMed ID: 18360293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Normal values for solid-state esophageal high-resolution manometry in a European population; an overview of all current metrics.
Weijenborg PW; Kessing BF; Smout AJ; Bredenoord AJ
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2014 May; 26(5):654-9. PubMed ID: 24533917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Normal esophageal pressure topography metrics for data derived from the Sandhill-Unisensor high-resolution manometry assembly in supine and sitting positions.
do Carmo GC; Jafari J; Sifrim D; de Oliveira RB
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Feb; 27(2):285-92. PubMed ID: 25557525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple Rapid Swallows (MRS) Complements Single-Swallow (SS) Analysis for High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry (HREM).
Leopold A; Yu D; Bhuta R; Kataria R; Lu X; Jehangir A; Harrison M; Friedenberg F; Malik Z; Schey R; Parkman HP
Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Aug; 64(8):2206-2213. PubMed ID: 30805798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In ineffective esophageal motility, failed swallows are more functionally relevant than weak swallows.
Jain A; Baker JR; Chen JW
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2018 Jun; 30(6):e13297. PubMed ID: 29368366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characteristics of high-resolution esophageal manometry in children without dysphagia.
Kovacic K; Kern M; Pawela L; Shaker R; Sood MR
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2022 Feb; 34(2):e14184. PubMed ID: 34089288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Normative data of high-resolution impedance manometry in the Chinese population.
Shi Y; Xiao Y; Peng S; Lin J; Xiong L; Chen M
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 28(10):1611-5. PubMed ID: 23730912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Elevated intrabolus pressure identifies obstructive processes when integrated relaxation pressure is normal on esophageal high-resolution manometry.
Quader F; Reddy C; Patel A; Gyawali CP
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol; 2017 Jul; 313(1):G73-G79. PubMed ID: 28408642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Normal values for esophageal high-resolution manometry.
Bogte A; Bredenoord AJ; Oors J; Siersema PD; Smout AJ
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2013 Sep; 25(9):762-e579. PubMed ID: 23803156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Normative values and factors affecting water-perfused esophageal high-resolution impedance manometry for a Chinese population.
Tseng PH; Wong RKM; Wu JF; Chen CC; Tu CH; Lee YC; Lee HC; Wang HP; Wu MS
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2018 Jun; 30(6):e13265. PubMed ID: 29230939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of a sitting vs supine posture on normative esophageal pressure topography metrics and Chicago Classification diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders.
Xiao Y; Read A; Nicodème F; Roman S; Kahrilas PJ; Pandolfino JE
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2012 Oct; 24(10):e509-16. PubMed ID: 22897486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modulation of pharyngeal swallowing by bolus volume and viscosity.
Ferris L; Doeltgen S; Cock C; Rommel N; Schar M; Carrión S; Scholten I; Omari T
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol; 2021 Jan; 320(1):G43-G53. PubMed ID: 33112160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of viscosity and volume on the patterns of esophageal motility in healthy adults using high-resolution manometry.
Park JH; Lee H; Rhee PL; Park JH
Dis Esophagus; 2015; 28(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 24571425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rapid Drink Challenge in high-resolution manometry: an adjunctive test for detection of esophageal motility disorders.
Ang D; Hollenstein M; Misselwitz B; Knowles K; Wright J; Tucker E; Sweis R; Fox M
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2017 Jan; 29(1):. PubMed ID: 27420913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of different postures and provocative swallow materials on the normative Chicago 3.0 metrics in a healthy Asian population.
Mohd Said MR; Wong Z; Abdul Rani R; Ngiu CS; Raja Ali RA; Lee YY
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 May; 36(5):1244-1252. PubMed ID: 33002243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated impedance manometry analysis as a method to assess esophageal function.
Rommel N; Van Oudenhove L; Tack J; Omari TI
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2014 May; 26(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 24447538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
